Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Tesis ini membahas tentang komunikasi interpersonal dalam pengambilan keputusan organisasi berdasarkan karakteristik anggota Majelis Wali Amanat UI, dengan melakukan studi kasus pada periode 2007 – 2012 dan 2014 – 2017. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif yang bersifat deskriptif. Metode pengumpulan data yang dilakukan adalah wawancara, observasi dan studi dokumentasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan paparan tentang komunikasi interpersonal yang terjadi dalam Majelis Wali Amanat Universitas Indonesia (MWA UI), serta hambatan komunikasi interpersonal dalam pengambilan keputusan MWA UI. Setiap organisasi tentu saja akan menghadapi hambatan dalam proses komunikasinya, hambatan ini tak hanya berasal dari luar organisasi namun dapat pula berasal dari dalam organisasi, seperti perbedaan karakteristik diantara anggotanya. Komunikasi interpersonal dalam MWA UI ini perlu di dukung pula oleh lima kualitas umum yang ada didalamnya seperti: Keterbukaan, empati, sikap mendukung, sikap positif dan kesetaraan yang ada diantara anggota-anggota MWA UI. Dengan terpenuhinya lima kualitas tersebut, niscaya perbedaan karakteristik diantara anggota MWA UI dapat disikapi untuk menjadi hal positif yang dapat membangun organisasi.

---

This thesis discusses the interpersonal communication in organizational decision-making based on the characteristics of members of the UI Board of Trustees, by conducting (case studies in the period 2007 - 2012 and 2014 – 2017). Study was a descriptive qualitative research. Methods of data collection were interviews, observation and documentation studies. Results showed exposure on interpersonal communication that occurs in the Board of Trustees of Universitas Indonesia (MWA UI), and interpersonal communication barriers in decision making in MWA UI. Each organization will certainly face barriers in the communication process, barriers not only come from the outside of the organization, but can also come from within the organization, such as the differences between the characteristics of its members. MWA interpersonal communication in this UI needs to be supported also by the five common qualities in it such as: openness, empathy, being supportive, positiveness and equality that exists between members of MWA UI. With the fulfillment of these five qualities, certainly differences between the characteristics of UI MWA members can be addressed to be a positive thing to build an organization."

"Machine generated contents note: Part I. Introduction: 1. Orchestration: global governance through intermediaries Kenneth W. Abbott, Philipp Genschel, Duncan Snidal and Bernhard Zangl; Part II. Managing States: 2. Orchestrating policy implementation: EU governance through regulatory networks Michael Blauberger and Berthold Rittberger; 3. Orchestration on a tight leash: state oversight of the WTO Manfred Elsig; 4. Orchestration by design: the G20 in international financial regulation Lora Anne Viola; 5. Efficient orchestration? The global environment facility in the governance of climate adaptation Erin Graham and Alexander Thompson; 6. Orchestrating monitoring: the optimal adaptation of international organizations Xinyuan Dai; 7. Orchestrating enforcement: international organizations mobilizing compliance constituencies Jonas Tallberg; Part III. Bypassing States: 8. WHO orchestrates? Coping with competitors in global health Tine Hanrieder; 9. Orchestrating peace? Civil war, conflict minerals, and the United Nations Security Council Virginia Haufler; 10. Governing where focality is low: UNEP and the principles for responsible investment Cornis van der Lugt and Klaus Dingwerth; 11. Orchestration for the 'social partners' only: internal constraints on the ILO Lucio Baccaro; 12. Orchestrating the fight against anonymous incorporation: a field experiment Michael Findley, Daniel Nielson and J. C. Sharman; Part IV. Implications: 13. Orchestration along the pareto frontier: winners and losers Walter Mattli and Jack Seddon; 14. Orchestrating global governance: from empirical results to theoretical implications Kenneth W. Abbott, Philipp Genschel, Duncan Snidal and Bernhard Zangl."