Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Notaris/PPAT dalam melaksanakan jabatannya harus berpedoman dan taat pada aturan-aturan serta kode etik profesi yang berlaku, tetapi realitanya masih sering dijumpai Notaris/PPAT yang melakukan penyimpangan-penyimpangan. Tesis ini membahas tentang adanya penyimpangan dari aturan-aturan serta kode etik Notaris/PPAT pada Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 451K/Pid/2018 dimana Notaris/PPAT HAK didakwa telah melakukan tindak pidana pemalsuan akta autentik. Adapun permasalahan yang diangkat dalam penelitian ini adalah mengenai terpenuhinya unsur-unsur tindak pidana pemalsuan akta autentik oleh Notaris/PPAT HAK dalam melaksanakan jabatannya dan tanggung jawab Notaris/PPAT HAK dalam kasus pemalsuan akta autentik berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 451/K.Pid/2018. Untuk menjawab permasalahan tersebut digunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan tipologi penelitian adalah problem solution. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa dalam kasus ini Notaris/PPAT HAK dikenakan Pasal 266 ayat (1) juncto Pasal 55 ayat (1) ke-1 KUHP, namun penggunaan pasal tersebut tidak tepat karena lebih tepat dikenakan Pasal 264 ayat (1) angka (1) juncto Pasal 55 ayat (1) ke-) KUHP. Notaris/PPAT dalam kasus ini dijatuhi pidana penjara 8 (delapan) bulan. Selain dimintakan pertanggungjawaban pidana, Notaris/PPAT HAK juga dapat dimintakan pertanggungjawaban baik secara perdata maupun administratif.

---

Notary/Land Deed Officer in carrying out his position must be guided and obey the rules and professional code of ethics, but in reality, Notary/Land Deed Officer often encounter irregularities. This thesis discusses the existence of deviations from the applicable rules and code of ethics that occurred in the Supreme Court Decision Number 451K/Pid/2018 where the Notary/Land Deed Officer HAK was accused of having committed a criminal act of authentic deed forgery. The issues raised in this study are the fulfillment of the elements of the criminal act of deed forgery by the Notary/Land Deed Officer HAK in carrying out his position and the responsibility of the Notary/Land Deed Officer HAK in the case of authentic deed forgery based on the Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 451/K.Pid/2018. To answer this problem, a normative juridical research method is used with a research typology that is a problem solution. The results of the research conclude that in this case the Notary Public/Land Deed Officer HAK is subject to Article 266 paragraph (1) in conjunction with Article 55 paragraph (1) 1st of the Criminal Code, but the use of this article is inappropriate because it is more appropriate to be subject to Article 264 paragraph (1) number (1) juncto Article 55 paragraph (1) to (1) KUHP. Notary/Land Deed Officer HAK in this case was sentenced to 8 (eight) months imprisonment. In addition to being asked for criminal responsibility, Notary/Land Deed Officer HAK can also be held accountable both civil and administratively."

"ABSTRAKNotaris dapat merangkap jabatan sebagai Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT)selama berada di dalam satu wilayah jabatan. Sebagai pejabat umum, Notaris danPPAT mempunyai kewenangan untuk membuat akta autentik. Dalammenjalankan jabatannya, seorang Notaris/PPAT harus mengikuti ketentuan yangsudah ditetapkan di dalam Undang-Undang. Namun masih ada oknumNotaris/PPAT yang bertindak diluar kewenangannya sehingga menimbulkanakibat hukum. Tesis ini membahas mengenai tanggung jawab seorangNotaris/PPAT atas tindak pidana yang dilakukannya pada pembuatan aktaautentik berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 143K/Pid/2015 yang menyatakan bahwa Notaris/PPAT tersebut bersalah melakukantindak pidana penipuan terhadap kliennya. Metode penelitian yang digunakandalam penulisan ini adalah metode yuridis normatif dengan tipologi deskriptifanalitis. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa Notaris/PPAT tersebut terbuktimelakukan serangkaian perbuatan diluar dari kewenangannya dan tidakmenjalankan kewajiban jabatannya dengan baik sehingga ia harus bertanggungjawab secara pidana atas kesalahannya yang menimbulkan kerugian bagikliennya. Penulis berpendapat, Notaris/PPAT tersebut juga dapat dimintaipertanggungjawaban secara perdata untuk mengganti kerugian yang telah dideritaoleh kliennya. Dengan adanya pelanggaran jabatan yang dilakukan dengansengaja, ia juga dapat dijatuhi sanksi administrasi berupa pemberhentian dengantidak hormat.

---

ABSTRACTA Notary may double as a Land Deed Officer as long it remains in an area ofoffice. As a public officer, a Notary and Land Deed Officer is authorized todraw up authentic deeds. In running his or her office, a Notary/Land DeedOfficer must comply with the provisions of the Law. However, there areNotaries/Land Deed Officers acting beyond their authority and causing legalconsequences. This thesis discusses the responsibility of a Notary/Land DeedOfficer for the criminal act he commits in the drawing-up of authentic deedsbased on the Decree of the Supreme Court of the Republic of IndonesiaNumber 143 K/Pid/2015, stating that the Notary/Land Deed Officer is guilty ofa criminal act of fraud against his clients. The method used in this research wasnormative juridical method with analytical descriptive research typology. Theresults of the research conclude that the Notary/Land Deed Officer was provento have committed a series of actions beyond his authority and he did notperform the responsibility of his office properly, causing him to be heldaccountable in criminal terms for his faults which harmed his clients.According to the researcher, the Notary/Land Deed Officer may also be heldaccountable in civil terms to pay compensation for the loss suffered by hisclients. With the offence of office he intentionally committed, he or she mayalso be sanctioned administratively in the form of dishonorable discharge."