Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Penelitian ini membahas mengenai gaya kepemimpinan politik Joko Widodo dan faktor-faktor yang berperan dalam pembentukan gaya kepemimpinannya tersebut. Pemimpin sebagai sosok sentral memainkan peran kunci dalam penyelenggaraan pemerintahan. Publisitas media yang tinggi terhadap kepemimpinan Jokowi disebabkan karena gaya kepemimpinan dan kinerjanya selama menjabat sebagai Walikota Solo dan Gubernur DKI Jakarta yang dinilai baik. Teori yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah teori Kepemimpinan Populis oleh John Lukacs dan teori Sosialisasi Politik oleh Rush dan Althoff. Penulis menemukan bahwa munculnya kepemimpinan populis Jokowi disebabkan oleh konteks politik dan latar belakang kehidupannya. Gaya kepemimpinan politik Jokowi yang populis diidentifikasi berdasarkan tingginya popularitas Jokowi di mata publik, kebijakan yang kerakyatan, dan gaya politik yang tidak berjarak dengan massa.

---

This research discusses about the political leadership style of Joko Widodo and the role factors of its establishment. A leader, as a central actor, plays a key role in the implementation of a government. High media publicity towards Jokowi`s leadership is caused by his good leadership and track record during his time in holding the office as a Mayor of Solo and a Governor of DKI Jakarta. The theory that is used to analyze Jokowi`s political track record in this research is the populist leadership style by John Lukacs and political socialization theory by Rush and Althoff. I find that environmental factor and political context are the main factors that establish Jokowi`s political leadership style. His high popularity with his populist policy and close to the society makes him as a leader with a populist leadership style."

"Malaya attained independence on August 31, 1957 fromBritain. However this new nation faced a communist insurgencyknown today as the ?Malayan Emergency? (1948-1960). Thenin 1961, Tunku announced a wider federation of ?Malaysia?,viz. Malaya, British Crown Colonies of Singapore, Sarawakand North Borneo, and the protectorate of Brunei. Counteringcommunism was a principal motive for ?Malaysia?.Sarawak?s leftist elements were rejected with an armedopposition. Malaysia was formed excluding Brunei. Amidstits birth pangs, Malaysia faced hostile neighbors Indonesiaand the Philippines; the former objected by way ofKonfrontasi (1963-1967) while the latter laid claim to Sabah(formerly North Borneo). Malaya/ Malaysia was borne in themidst of the Cold War (1947?1991), a bipolar world betweenthe US and the USSR. Malaya/Malaysia is utilized as a caseof analysis and evaluation in the context of the twin trendsof continuities and transformations in tracing the historicaldevelopments from the 1950?s to the 1990?s. The risks,motives, and challenges that prompted the shift in foreignrelations reveal as much of the personality of the political leadership, the prevailing situations, and conditions fromwithin and circumstances from without."

"Tiga tauji beliau di akhir tahun 2011 yang dimuat di buku ini sangat sarat dengan pesan-pesan bagi para pemimpin dakwah baik politisi dakwah di parlemen, para Kader Ahli sebagai pemimpin para kader maupun bagi Tim 20 yang mematangkan konsep memunculkan kepimpinan, sehingga bila ditarik benang merahnya taujih di 2011 bagaimana menegakkan kepemimpinan dakwah agar bisa melindungi dakwah dari konspirasi"

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menilai autentisitas kepemimpinan politik pada pesan yang dikembangkan Gubernur DKI Anies Baswedan, Gubernur Jawa Barat Ridwan Kamil, Gubernur Jawa Tengah Ganjar Pranowo, dan Gubernur Jawa Timur Khofifah Indar Parawangsa pada akun media sosial mereka, yakni Instagram. Penilaian tersebut berbasis pada konsep autentisitas termediasi media sosial (Enli, 2015; Luebke, 2021), komunikasi politik populis (Canovan 1999; Jagers & Walgrave 2007; Stavrakakis 2017; De Vreese et al. 2018), dan kepemimpinan autentik (Luthans & Avolio, 2003). Dengan paradigma konstruktivis, penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan forensik komunikasi (Hamad, 2018) sebagai metode penelitian. Berdasarkan analisis dan interpretasi data, penelitian ini menghasilkan beberapa temuan penelitian yang menunjukkan kebaruan. Autentisitas pemimpin politik dapat diforensik dengan basis artefak komunikasi di media sosial sehingga bisa mengungkap siapa paling autentik, motif, kontruksi motif, dan kebenaran representasinya. Pemimpin politik mengonstruksi pola autentisitasnya untuk menunjukkan kepada publik mereka bisa berbeda dengan pemimpin autentik lainnya. Pemimpin autentik mengonstruksi drama politik di media sosial dengan berbagai dialog, klimaks, dan emosi yang dimainkan dengan cara skenario dan spontanitas. Dengan media sosial, autentisitas bukan saja ditampilkan dalam bentuk kemasan oleh pemimpin politik, tetapi mengandung substansi yang membedakan antara satu pemimpin dengan pemimpin lainnya. Autentisitas bukan suatu ideologi, melainkan suatu strategi yang ditempuh seseorang pemimpin politik di media sosial untuk menunjukkan atau mempresentasikan dirinya. Meskipun bukan suatu ideologi yang menjadi cara pandang dan pemikiran, autentisitas tetap mengandung nilai dan standar. Penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi pengembangan teori autentisitas termediasi media sosial, komunikasi politik populis dan kepemimpinan autentik. Penelitian ini mendorong agar publik perlu membangun kesadaran kolektif terkait autentisitas kepemimpinan politik.

---

This study aims to assess the authenticity of political leadership in messages developed by DKI Governor Anies Baswedan, West Java Governor Ridwan Kamil, Central Java Governor Ganjar Pranowo, and East Java Governor Khofifah Indar Parawangsa on their social media accounts, namely Instagram. The assessment is based on the concept of social media mediated authentication (Enli, 2015; Luebke, 2021), populist political leadership (Canovan 1999; Jagers & Walgrave 2007;  Stavrakakis 2017; De Vreese et al. 2018), and authentic leadership (Luthans & Avolio, 2003). With a constructivist paradigm, this study uses a qualitative approach with communication forensics (Hamad, 2018). Based on the analysis and interpretation of the data, this research produces several research findings that show novelty. The authenticity of political leaders can be forensically based on communication artifacts in social media so that they can reveal who is the most authentic, their motives, motives construction, and the truth of their representation. Political leaders construct their patterns of authenticity to show the public that they can be different from other authentic leaders. Authentic leaders construct political drama on social media with various dialogues, climaxes, and emotions that are played out by means of scenarios and spontaneity. With social media, authenticity is not only shown in the form of packaging by political leaders, but contains substance that distinguishes one leader from another. Authenticity is not an ideology, but a strategy adopted by a political leader on social media to show or present himself. Even though it is not an ideology that becomes a perspective and way of thinking, authenticity still contains values and standards. This research contributes to the development of social media mediated authentication theory, populist political communication and authentic leadership. This research encourages the public to build collective awareness regarding the authenticity of political leadership."