Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
Perjanjian perkawinan atau prenuptial agreement adalah perjanjian yang dibuat sebelum perkawinan dilangsungkan dan mengikat kedua belah pihak calon mempelai yang akan menikah. Banyaknya angka perceraian yang berujung masalah, khususnya sesuatu yang menjadi akibat-akibat yang timbul karena adanya suatu perkawinan, contohnya adalah timbulnya harta gono-gini dirasakan perlu dibuatnya perjanjian perkawinan. Dengan dibuatnya perjanjian tersebut, maka aturan mengenai harta para pihak diatur dengan jelas di sana, baik mengenai harta bawaan maupun harta yang dihasilkan oleh para pihak selama masa perkawinan. Tentunya prosedur pembuatan perjanjian perkawinan haruslah dengan prosedur yang berlaku seperti perjanjian tersebut harus dibuat pada saat atau sebelum berlangsungnya perkawinan, dibuat dengan akta notaris, dan harus didaftarkan di Lembaga Pencatat Perkawinan. Begitu juga dengan masalah perubahan perjanjian perkawinan yang dilakukan setelah perkawinan berlangsung. Perubahan tersebut harus dilakukan sesuai dengan prosedur yang ada sehingga berkekuatan hukum tetap dan mengikat para pihaknya. Perjanjian perkawinan hendaknya dapat memberikan perlindungan hukum bagi para pihak yang terkait di dalamnya. Penulis dalam penulisan skripsi ini mencoba menganalisa perlindungan hukum terhadap harta benda perkawinnan yang menggunakan perjanjian perkawinan, serta perlindungan hukum terhadap perjanjian perkawinan yang mengalami perubahan. ...... Prenuptial agreement is a written contract between two people who are about to marry that concerns about various financial issues. It covers the control and possession of property and other assets taken into the marriage and later obtained during the marriage either individually or jointly, as well as the couple's future earnings, and how such property or assets will be distributed in the event of divorce or death. These agreements are fairly common if either or both parties have substantial assets, children from a prior marriage, potential inheritances or earn high incomes. The writer of this thesis analyze the impact of law protection on prenuptial agreement against the financial issues in a marriage with prenuptial agreement and how the protection takes place on the prenuptial agreement which has been changed after the marriage. As a result of the recent high number of divorces which ended with problems, pre-nuptial agreement is expected to minimized those problems in advance. However, the procedure on creating the prenuptial agreement has to be made by law which would bound the two parties legally. Furthermore, any changes on the prenuptial agreement after the marriage has also be done by law to make it remain valid legally.

Abstrak :
Perjanjian kawin dibuat untuk menyimpangi ketentuan persatuan harta perkawinan yang diatur dalam undang-undang serta dibuat dengan akta otentik untuk kepastian tanggal akta dan didaftarkan agar berlaku pada pihak ketiga yang terikat dengan para pihak pembuat perjanjian kawin. Akta otentik ini dibuat di hadapan pejabat berwenang, yakni seorang Notaris yang tunduk pada suatu undang-undang khusus yang mengatur jabatannya termasuk tugas, kewajiban serta tanggung jawabnya dalam membuat akta, yaitu Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris. Dengan tidak dibuatnya akta perjanjian kawin yang sesuai dengan kaidah-kaidah hukum yang telah ditentukan, maka akta perjanjian kawin tersebut bisa dianggap cacat hukum dan batal demi hukum dan menjadikan para pihak berada dalam persatuan harta perkawinan. Dalam penulisan ini, kasus yang diangkat adalah kasus dimana diadakannya sebuah perjanjian kredit dan perjanjian jaminan yang dibuat oleh Almarhum Suhendro Halim dengan PT Bank Negara Indonesia berdasarkan perjanjian kawin yang cacat hukum dan batal demi hukum serta tidak didaftarkan pada pegawai pencatatan perkawinan yang berakibat pada dikembalikannya jaminan tersebut ketika harus dieksekusi kepada Ny. Ratnaria Tjandrasa sebagai penggugat bersih dari jaminan. Dari sini kemudian penulis melakukan penelitian yuridis normatif tentang tanggung jawab Notaris dalam menjalankan jabatannya dalam membuat akta perjanjian kawin serta upaya hukum seperti apakah yang dapat dilakukan pihak ketiga yang dirugikan karena berada dalam posisi tidak memiliki jaminan untuk pelunasan hutang perjanjian kredit yang masih berjalan.

---

The prenuptial agreement is made to deviate from the union of the marital assets which stipulated in the law and made with an authentic deed for certainty of the date and registered to apply to third parties whose bound by the prenuptial agreement makers. This authentic deed made before an authorized official, a Notary who is subject to a special law that regulates his position including his duties, obligations and responsibilities in making a deed, namely Law Number 2 Year 2014 concerning Amendment to Law Number 30 years 2004 concerning Notary Position. With the absence of a prenuptial agreement deed in accordance with predetermined legal rules, the prenuptial agreement deed can be deemed legally flawed and null and void and makes the parties in the union of marital assets. In this paper, the case raised is the case in which a loan agreement and guarantee agreement was made by the late Suhendro Halim with PT Bank Negara Indonesia based on a prenuptial agreement that was legally flawed and null and void and was not registered with the marriage registrar employee who resulted in the return of collateral when it must be executed to Ny. Ratnaria Tjandrasa as the plaintiff free from collateral status. From this case, the writer conducts a normative juridical analysis about the responsibility of the Notary in carrying out his position in making prenuptial agreement deeds and what legal remedies can be done by third parties who are disadvantaged because they are in the position of having no collateral for repayment for the loan agreement.

Abstrak :
Seorang pria dan seorang wanita berhak membuat perjanjian perkawinan yang berlaku bagi perkawinannya. Perjanjian perkawinan pada umumnya bermaksud untuk mengatur mengenai harta kekayaan pasangan suami isteri. Perbedaan peraturan yang berlaku di masing-masing negara yaitu Indonesia, Australia, dan Amerika membuat penulis tertarik untuk mencari persamaan dan perbedaan dalam proses dan syarat sahnya perjanjian perkawinan yang diatur dalam negara-negara tersebut. Sehingga permasalahan yang dikemukakan dalam tesis ini adalah bagaimana persamaan proses dan syarat sahnya perjanjian perkawinan serta bagaimana perbedaan proses dan syarat sahnya perjanjian perkawinan di Indonesia, Australia, dan Amerika. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam tesis ini adalah tipe penelitian normatif, yaitu penelitian yang dilakukan terhadap bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder. Simpulan dari penelitian dalam tesis ini adalah terdapat persamaan yang ditemukan antara lain perjanjian perkawinan harus dibuat secara tertulis, dapat dibuat sebelum atau pada saat perkawinan berlangsung, dan dapat dicabut atau diubah kembali. Selain itu terdapat perbedaan antara lain tidak semuanya harus menggunakan independent legal advice, pengungkapan penuh atas harta benda (transparansi) pada saat pembuatan, dan keharusan perjanjian perkawinan untuk didaftarkan ke pengadilan di negaranya.

---

A man and a woman have the right to make a prenuptial agreement applicable to their marriage. Prenuptial agreement in general intends to regulate the possessions of married couples. Different regulations prevailing in each country, Indonesia, Australia, and the United States make the author interested to find similarities and differences in the process and terms of validation of prenuptial agreement arranged in those countries. So the problem presented in this thesis is how the similarity of the process and terms of prenuptial agreement validation and how the difference of process and terms of prenuptial agreement validation in Indonesia, Australia, and America. The research method used in this thesis is the type of normative research, namely research conducted on primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The conclusion of the research in this thesis is that there are similarities found, among others, the prenuptial agreement must be made in writing, can be made before or during the marriage, and can be revoked or changed again. In addition there are differences, among others, not all must use independent legal advice, full disclosure of property (transparency) at the time of manufacture, and the obligation of prenuptial agreement to be registered to the courts in the country.

Abstrak :
Dalam perkembangan zaman seperti sekarang ini, globalisasi tidak hanya merubuhkan "batasan" suatu negara dalam bidang ekonomi, politik dan kebudayaan, namun juga pergaulan manusia yang dapat dilihat dari semakin banyaknya kasus perkawinan yang terjadi antara dua orang yang tunduk pada dua hukum yang berbeda karena perbedaan status kewarganegaraan. Perkawinan campuran pada perkembangannya menimbulkan berbagai permasalahan hukum, salah satunya yaitu dalam ruang lingkup status harta kekayaan bersama. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif, penulis berkesimpulan bahwa Warga Negara Indonesia yang melangsungkan perkawinan campuran (dengan Warga Negara Asing) dapat tetap memiliki properti dengan status hak milik dengan cara membuat perjanjian pemisahan harta. Karena seperti yang kita ketahui bersama, hak milik atas tanah hanya melekat pada Warga Negara Indonesia. Sedangkan pada prinsipnya, apabila tidak ada perjanjian pemisahan harta, maka harta yang timbul setelah terjadinya perkawinan akan menjadi harta bersama. Sehingga, untuk tetap mendapatkan status hak milik dari properti tersebut, Warga Negara Indonesia yang bersangkutan harus membuat perjanjian pemisahan harta untuk memastikan bahwa secara sah properti yang dimiliki adalah milik Warga Negara Indonesia dengan status hak milik.

---

In today`s development, globalization does not only knock down the "boundaries" of a country in the fields of economy, politics and culture, but also human relations which can be seen from the increasing number of marriages that occur between two people who are subject to two different laws because of differences citizenship status. Mixed marriage in its development raises various legal problems, one of which is in the scope of the status of shared assets. By using a normative juridical research method, the authors conclude that Indonesian citizens who carry out mixed marriages (with foreign nationals) can continue to own property with the status of property rights by making a prenuptial agreement concerning about separation of property. Because as we all know, property rights to land are only inherent in Indonesian citizens. Whereas in principle, if there is no agreement on the separation of property, the assets arising after the marriage will become a joint asset. So, in order to continue to obtain the property status of the property, the Indonesian citizen concerned must make a property separation agreement to ensure that legally owned property belongs to Indonesian citizens with ownership status.

Abstrak :
ABSTRAK
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan membedakan harta benda perkawinan berupa harta bersama yang diperoleh selama perkawinan dan harta bawaan yang diperoleh masing-masing suami isteri serta berada di bawah penguasaan masing-masing sepanjang para pihak tidak menentukan lain. Pada saat atau sebelum perkawinan para pihak dapat membuat perjanjian perkawinan yang memisahkan harta kekayaan mereka sehingga masing-masing mengurus sediri harta baik yang dibawa ke dalam perkawinan maupun yang diperoleh sepanjang perkawinan. Lain halnya jika terdapat penetapan pengadilan yang menetapkan salah satu pihak baik suami maupun isteri berada dalam pengampuan dan tidak dapat mengurus hartanya, sedangkan sidang perceraian sedang berlangsung. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yang bersifat yuridis normatif, dimana penelitian mengacu pada norma-norma hukum yang tertuang dalam peraturan perundang-undangan yang berkaitan dengan pengaturan harta perkawinan dan perjanjian perkawinan. Data yang dipergunakan adalah data sekunder berupa bahan kepustakaan. Kesimpulan yang diperoleh adalah dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan belum mengatur secara lengkap mengenai harta bersama dan perjanjian perkawinan. Jika melihat tanggung jawab suami sebagai kepala keluarga yang baik maka pengurusan suami terhadap harta benda istri dapat dibenarkan selama perkawinan tersebut belum berakhir. Suami dapat melakukan pengurusan terhadap harta isteri namun apabila setelah pengampuan tersebut berakhir maka suami harus bertanggung jawab terhadap pengurusan tersebut kepada Balai Harta Peninggalan selaku pengampu pengawas. Pengurusan harta tersebut dilakukan semata-mata untuk kepentingan isteri. Apabila terdapat kerugian akibat kelalaian suami maka suami wajib mengganti kerugian tersebut.

---

ABSTRACT
Law Number 1 of 1974 on Marriage defines two types of marital properties: joint property, which is acquired during marriage, and separate property, which is acquired by each husband and wife and is under each party’s power, providing that it is never stated otherwise. On the occasion of or prior to marriage, both parties may produce a prenuptial agreement which separates their properties, so that they may administer their own properties which were acquired by each party both before or during the marriage. Nevertheless, similar arrangement does not apply when a court’s decision has ruled that one of the parties (either the husband or the wife) is put under the guardianship of her/his spouse and deemed incapable of administering her/his own property, nevertheless, those parties eventually applied for a divorce. This study applies a juridical-normative research approach in which references are made to legal norms stipulated in laws on the management of marital properties and prenuptial agreement. This study utilizes secondary data in the form of literature resources. It concludes that Law Number 1 of 1974 on Marriage does not provide comprehensive regulation on joint property and prenuptial agreement. Based on the assumption that a husband should be a responsible head of his family, which appointed a husband as the guardian of his wife’s property, is justifiable provided that the marriage has not been terminated. During marriage, a husband can administer his wife’s property; however, when the marriage is terminated, he has to be deemed responsible for anything related to the said property during his guardianship to Balai Harta Peninggalan as a supervisor guardians. He must administer the property only for the benefit of his wife. Should there be any damage or loss due to his negligence, he is required to perform indemnification.

Abstrak :
Kehadiran Perseroan Terbatas sebagai suatu bentuk badan usaha dalam kehidupan sehari hari tidak lagi dapat diabaikan Dalam ketentuan Undang Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 Tentang Perseroan Terbatas diatur bahwa Perseroan Terbatas dididirikan oleh dua orang atau lebih berdasarkan perjanjian yang dituangkan dalam akta pendirian yang dibuat oleh Notaris Apabila Perseroan Terbatas didirikan oleh dua orang atau lebih dan dapat dimungkinkan pemegang saham dari sebuah Perseroan terbatas adalah sepasang suami isteri Apabila Perseroan Terbatas didirikan oleh suami isteri maka mereka harus membuat perjanjian kawin agar memiliki harta terpisah sehingga masing masing bertindak sebagai subjek hukum yang mandiri dengan harta kekayaan sendiri sendiri secara terpisah Sesuai Pasal 29 Undang Undang Nomor 1 tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan perjanjian perkawinan berlaku bagi pihak ketiga setelah disahkan oleh pegawai pencatat perkawinan dalam hal ini setelah dicatatkan di kantor catatan sipil Sebaliknya apabila mereka tidak membuat perjanjian kawin maka mereka sebagai suami isteri merupakan satu pihak karena terjadi persatuan harta sebagaimana yang diatur dalam Pasal 119 KUH Perdata Analisis dilakukan terhadap keabsahan PT YZ yang didirikan oleh pasangan suami isteri yang menikah dengan perjanjian kawin yang tidak didaftar dan tanggung jawab Notaris X dalam pembuatan akta pendirian PT YZ Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kepustakaan dan analisis dengan menggunakan data sekunder dan hasil wawancara Dengan terpenuhinya persyaratan pendirian Perseroan Terbatas maka PT YZ sah sebagai sebuah badan hukum Perseroan Terbatas tetapi karena perjanjian kawin para pendiri tidak didaftar mengakibatkan tanggung jawab para pendiri menjadi tidak terbatas yang secara otomatis bentuknya menjadi persekutuan Dari hasil analisa dapat diketahui bahwa keabsahan PT YZ adalah sah sebagai dan tanggung jawab notaris X hanya sebatas perbuatan formil karena tanggung jawab Notaris dalam pembuatan akta perseroan secara umum telah ditentukan oleh undang undang dan instansi yang terkait Kata kunci Perseroan Terbatas Suami Isteri Perjanjian Perkawinan Notaris

---

The existence of limited liability Company in the form of business entity in daily lives is prevalent Under Law No 40 Year 2007 Limited liability Company is formed by two or more person by an agreement incorporated in a notary's deed There is a chance that shareholders of a company are spouses If the company is formed by spouses they need to have prenuptial agreement to separate their assets so both act as independent legal entity having its own asset In accordance to Article 29 on Law No 1 Year 1974 on Marriage prenuptial agreement is in force and binds third party if the agreement is validated by marriage registry in this case after the agreement is registered in civil registry Oh the other hand if they do not make a prenuptial agreement then both of the spouses are considered one entity as there is a mix of assets as governed under article 119 of Civil Code This thesis will analyze whether PT YZ's establishment is legal considering it is established by spouses with an unregistered prenuptial agreement This research will also analyze the notary X's responsibility in writing the deed of PT YZ This research is literature based using secondary data and interview result Since PT YZ fulfilled all the requirement as a legal entity thus PT YZ is valid as a legal entity of limited liability Company However since the prenuptial agreement of the founder of PT YZ is unregistered automatically PT YZ can only be considered as an association From the analysis and the notary X's responsibility is limited to formal activity From the analysis we will find out that PT YZ is valid as a legal entity and the notary X's responsibility is limited to formal activity as Notary's responsibility in forming Company's need is set out under the law and related agency Keywords Limited Liability Company Spouses Prenuptial Agreement Notary

Abstrak :
[Perkawinan campuran sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 adalah perkawinan antara dua orang yang di Indonesia tunduk pada hukum yang berlainan, karena perbedaan kewarganegaraan dan salah satu pihak berkewarganegaraan Indonesia. Perkawinan campuran dapat dilaksanakan di Indonesia maupun di luar Indonesia. Dalam hal perkawinan campuran dilaksanakan di luar Indonesia adalah sah bilamana dilakukan menurut hukum yang berlaku di Negara di mana perkawinan itu dilangsungkan dan bagi Warga Negara Indonesia tidak melanggar ketentuan-ketentuan Undang-Undang Perkawinan. Dalam jangka waktu 1 (satu) tahun sejak sekembalinya mereka ke Indonesia, bukti perkawinan mereka harus didaftarkan di Kantor Pencatatan perkawinan tempat tinggal mereka. Pasangan perkawinan campuran yang hendak melangsungkan perkawinan campuran di luar negeri juga dapat membuat perjanjian perkawinan. Perjanjian perkawinan adalah perjanjian tertulis yang dibuat oleh calon suami isteri sebelum atau pada saat perkawinan dilangsungkan untuk mengatur akibat-akibat perkawinan terhadap harta kekayaan mereka. Pentingnya pembuatan perjanjian perkawinan bagi pasangan yang hendak melangsungkan perkawinan campuran adalah terkait dengan perlindungan hukum terhadap hak milik atas tanah di Indonesia yang hanya dapat dimiliki oleh Warga Negara Indonesia, sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria. Penulisan tesis ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif, yaitu dilakukan dengan menelusuri bahan hukum sekunder berupa norma-norma dari peraturan perundang-undangan yang berkaitan dengan permasalahan. Prosedur pembuatan perjanjian perkawinan dalam perkawinan campuran yang dilangsungkan di luar negeri, tetap mengacu pada ketentuan Undang-Undang Perkawinan yaitu dibuat sebelum atau pada saat perkawinan dilangsungkan dan berdasarkan pada hukum yang berlaku di Indonesia. Dalam hal setelah perkawinan dilangsungkan di luar negeri dan mereka kembali ke Indonesia namun tidak mendaftarkan perkawinannya tersebut dan kemudian mereka membuat perjanjian perkawinan, maka perjanjian perkawinan tersebut menjadi batal demi hukum karena melanggar ketentuan Undang-undang yaitu dibuat setelah perkawinan berlangsung. ......Mixed marriage as stipulated in Law No. 1 of 1974 is a marriage between two people in Indonesia which subject to different laws, because of differences in nationality and one party is having Indonesian nationality. Mixed marriage can be implemented and held in Indonesia and outside Indonesia. In the case of mixed marriages conducted outside Indonesia is legal if carried out under the applicable law in the State where the marriage was celebrated and for Indonesian citizens do not violate the provisions of the Marriage Act. Within a period of one (1) year since upon their return to Indonesia, evidence of their marriage should be registered in the marriage registration office where they live. Mixed marriage couples who want to hold the marriage abroad can also make a prenuptial agreement. Prenuptial agreement is a written agreement made by the prospective spouses before or at the day of the marriage took place to regulate the effects of marriage on their property. The importance of making prenuptial agreements for couples who want to have a mixed marriage is associated with legal protection of property rights over land in Indonesia that can only be owned by an Indonesian citizen, as stipulated in the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). This thesis using normative juridical method, which is carried out by tracing the secondary law in the form of norms of the legislation relating to the cases. The procedure of making the prenuptial agreement in mixed marriages held abroad, still have to refer to the provisions of the Marriage Act is made before or at the day of the marriage took place and according to the laws in force in Indonesia. In the event that after the marriage held abroad and they return to Indonesia but did not register the marriage and then they make a prenuptial agreement, then the prenuptial agreement becomes null and void because it violated the provisions of the Act that is made after the marriage took place. Mixed marriage as stipulated in Law No. 1 of 1974 is a marriage between two people in Indonesia which subject to different laws, because of differences in nationality and one party is having Indonesian nationality. Mixed marriage can be implemented and held in Indonesia and outside Indonesia. In the case of mixed marriages conducted outside Indonesia is legal if carried out under the applicable law in the State where the marriage was celebrated and for Indonesian citizens do not violate the provisions of the Marriage Act. Within a period of one (1) year since upon their return to Indonesia, evidence of their marriage should be registered in the marriage registration office where they live. Mixed marriage couples who want to hold the marriage abroad can also make a prenuptial agreement. Prenuptial agreement is a written agreement made by the prospective spouses before or at the day of the marriage took place to regulate the effects of marriage on their property. The importance of making prenuptial agreements for couples who want to have a mixed marriage is associated with legal protection of property rights over land in Indonesia that can only be owned by an Indonesian citizen, as stipulated in the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). This thesis using normative juridical method, which is carried out by tracing the secondary law in the form of norms of the legislation relating to the cases. The procedure of making the prenuptial agreement in mixed marriages held abroad, still have to refer to the provisions of the Marriage Act is made before or at the day of the marriage took place and according to the laws in force in Indonesia. In the event that after the marriage held abroad and they return to Indonesia but did not register the marriage and then they make a prenuptial agreement, then the prenuptial agreement becomes null and void because it violated the provisions of the Act that is made after the marriage took place. Mixed marriage as stipulated in Law No. 1 of 1974 is a marriage between two people in Indonesia which subject to different laws, because of differences in nationality and one party is having Indonesian nationality. Mixed marriage can be implemented and held in Indonesia and outside Indonesia. In the case of mixed marriages conducted outside Indonesia is legal if carried out under the applicable law in the State where the marriage was celebrated and for Indonesian citizens do not violate the provisions of the Marriage Act. Within a period of one (1) year since upon their return to Indonesia, evidence of their marriage should be registered in the marriage registration office where they live. Mixed marriage couples who want to hold the marriage abroad can also make a prenuptial agreement. Prenuptial agreement is a written agreement made by the prospective spouses before or at the day of the marriage took place to regulate the effects of marriage on their property. The importance of making prenuptial agreements for couples who want to have a mixed marriage is associated with legal protection of property rights over land in Indonesia that can only be owned by an Indonesian citizen, as stipulated in the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). This thesis using normative juridical method, which is carried out by tracing the secondary law in the form of norms of the legislation relating to the cases. The procedure of making the prenuptial agreement in mixed marriages held abroad, still have to refer to the provisions of the Marriage Act is made before or at the day of the marriage took place and according to the laws in force in Indonesia. In the event that after the marriage held abroad and they return to Indonesia but did not register the marriage and then they make a prenuptial agreement, then the prenuptial agreement becomes null and void because it violated the provisions of the Act that is made after the marriage took place. ;Mixed marriage as stipulated in Law No. 1 of 1974 is a marriage between two people in Indonesia which subject to different laws, because of differences in nationality and one party is having Indonesian nationality. Mixed marriage can be implemented and held in Indonesia and outside Indonesia. In the case of mixed marriages conducted outside Indonesia is legal if carried out under the applicable law in the State where the marriage was celebrated and for Indonesian citizens do not violate the provisions of the Marriage Act. Within a period of one (1) year since upon their return to Indonesia, evidence of their marriage should be registered in the marriage registration office where they live. Mixed marriage couples who want to hold the marriage abroad can also make a prenuptial agreement. Prenuptial agreement is a written agreement made by the prospective spouses before or at the day of the marriage took place to regulate the effects of marriage on their property. The importance of making prenuptial agreements for couples who want to have a mixed marriage is associated with legal protection of property rights over land in Indonesia that can only be owned by an Indonesian citizen, as stipulated in the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). This thesis using normative juridical method, which is carried out by tracing the secondary law in the form of norms of the legislation relating to the cases. The procedure of making the prenuptial agreement in mixed marriages held abroad, still have to refer to the provisions of the Marriage Act is made before or at the day of the marriage took place and according to the laws in force in Indonesia. In the event that after the marriage held abroad and they return to Indonesia but did not register the marriage and then they make a prenuptial agreement, then the prenuptial agreement becomes null and void because it violated the provisions of the Act that is made after the marriage took place. , Mixed marriage as stipulated in Law No. 1 of 1974 is a marriage between two people in Indonesia which subject to different laws, because of differences in nationality and one party is having Indonesian nationality. Mixed marriage can be implemented and held in Indonesia and outside Indonesia. In the case of mixed marriages conducted outside Indonesia is legal if carried out under the applicable law in the State where the marriage was celebrated and for Indonesian citizens do not violate the provisions of the Marriage Act. Within a period of one (1) year since upon their return to Indonesia, evidence of their marriage should be registered in the marriage registration office where they live. Mixed marriage couples who want to hold the marriage abroad can also make a prenuptial agreement. Prenuptial agreement is a written agreement made by the prospective spouses before or at the day of the marriage took place to regulate the effects of marriage on their property. The importance of making prenuptial agreements for couples who want to have a mixed marriage is associated with legal protection of property rights over land in Indonesia that can only be owned by an Indonesian citizen, as stipulated in the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). This thesis using normative juridical method, which is carried out by tracing the secondary law in the form of norms of the legislation relating to the cases. The procedure of making the prenuptial agreement in mixed marriages held abroad, still have to refer to the provisions of the Marriage Act is made before or at the day of the marriage took place and according to the laws in force in Indonesia. In the event that after the marriage held abroad and they return to Indonesia but did not register the marriage and then they make a prenuptial agreement, then the prenuptial agreement becomes null and void because it violated the provisions of the Act that is made after the marriage took place. ]

Abstrak :
Pada pendirian persekutuan komanditer terdapat persyaratan yang harus dipenuhi oleh pendiri. Pendiri dalam hal ini merupakan perorangan yang tentunya cakap untuk melakukan perbuatan hukum. Suami isteri merupakan perorangan yang cakap untuk melakukan perbuatan hukum khususnya mendirikan persekutuan komanditer. Namun terdapat hal-hal yang perlu diperhatikan apabila suami isteri akan mendirikan persekutuan komanditer karena mereka tunduk pula pada Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tantang perkawinan yang menyangkut harta bersama mereka. Maka timbul permasalahan bagaimana pendirian persekutuan komanditer yang didirikan suami isteri tanpa adanya perjanjian kawin, bagaimana pendirian persekutuan komanditer yang didirikan suami isteri tanpa adanya perjanjian kawin apabila terdapat utang dalam persekutuan komanditer, bagaimana peran notaris apabila terdapat suami isteri yang akan mendirikan persekutuan komanditer. Penulis meneliti permasalahan tersebut dengan menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif. Suami isteri tidak dapat mendirikan persekutuan komanditer karena terdapat syarat yang tidak terpenuhi yaitu didirikan oleh 2 (dua) orang atau lebih. Selain itu apabila terdapat utang dalam persekutuan komanditer maka pihak yang menjadi sekutu pasif ikut bertanggung jawab terhadap utang. Dalam hal ini definisi persekutuan komanditer tidak terpenuhi. Dalam hal ini peran notaris sangat penting karena notaris wajib membuat akta dengan seksama dan melakukan penyuluhan atas aktanya itu. Suami isteri yang akan mendirikan persekutuan komanditer dapat membuat perjanjian kawin terlebih dahulu, hal ini dapat dilakukan karena sesuai dengan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XII/2015 perjanjian kawin dapat dibuat setelah perkawinan.

---

In the establishment of a limited partnership, there are requirements that must be fulfilled by the founder. The founder in this case is an individual who is certainly capable to perform legal acts. Husbands and wives are capable individuals to perform legal acts especially establishing a limited partnership. But there are things that need to be considered if the husband and wife will establish a limited partnership because they are also obey the Law No. 1 Year 1974 about Marriage concerning their community property. Then some issues will arises, how the establishment of limited partnership established by husband and wife without any prenuptial agreement, how the establishment of limited partnership established by husband and wife without any prenuptial agreement if there is a debt in the limited partnership, how the role of a notary if there are husband and wife who will establish a limited partnership. The author examines these issues using normative juridical research method. Husband and wife cannot establish a limited partnership because there are unfulfilled conditions to establish a limited paertnership. Limited partnership is established by 2 (two) people or more. In addition, if there is a debt in a limited partnership then the party that becomes the passive ally involved in the debt. In this case the definition of limited partnership is not fulfilled. The role of notary is very important because the notary must make a notarial deed carefully and do counseling about their notarial deed. Husband and wife who will establish a limited partnership can make the prenuptial agreement in advance, this can be done because in accordance with the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 69 / PUU-XII / 2015 that prenuptial agreement can be made after marriage.