Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Permasalahan pada penelitian ini adalah untuk menjawab pertanyaan bagaimanakah interaksi antar negara dalam proses institusionalisme NEAT sebagai think-tank pada kerjasama Asia Timur? Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendapatkan penjelasan mengenai pergerakan Asia Timur khususnya interaksi antar negara anggotanya dilihat melalui NEAT sebagai secondtrack dari kerja sama Asia Timur. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode dokumentasi yaitu berdasarkan dokumen-dokumen yang dikeluarkan secara resmi oleh pertemuan Asia Timur dan NEAT. Jenis metode penelitian dokumentasi seperti ini pada umumnya akan sepenuhnya berfokus kepada laporan-laporan dan informasi resmi yangh diterbitkan oleh pemerintah atau agen internasional. Dari analisa tersebut dapat terlihat ciri khas dari sebuah institusi internasional yang dimiliki oleh NEAT. Ciri yang pertama memperlihatkan bahwa NEAT merupakan sebuah jaringan yang terdiri dari kelompok akademisi yang memiliki keahlian atau kompetensi mengenai kebijakan internasional. Rekomendasi kebijakan yang dihasilkan lahir dari adanya penelitian yang relevan. Dari ciri khas diatas menggambarkan bahwa NEAT berada pada tahap Epistemic Community dalam tingkatan institusi internasional Ruggie. Pada akhirnya hasil dari penelitian ini membenarkan hipotesis yang dipaparkan pada awal penulisan. Bahwa interaksi dari negara-negara anggota NEAT berhasil mewujudkan proses institusionalisasi NEAT dalam kerjasama APT. Hingga tahun 2009 proses institusionalisasi NEAT berada pada tahap Epistemic Community. NEAT berhasil memberikan sudut pandang dari ranah ilmu yang mampu memberikan gambaran hubungan politik.

---

This research aims to answer the question on ? How is the institutionalization of Network of East Asian Think-tanks (NEAT) in The ASEAN Plus Three Regionalism?. The objective of this research is to get an explanation on the interaction between every country in the ASEAN Plus Three Regionalism on the NEAT institutionalization. This research uses the document research as the study method. As an international institution NEAT is an epistemic community As an epistemic community NEAT holds a variety of research which called as working groups. The result of the working group will be recommended as a policy recommendation. This recommendation will be delivered to the APT leaders to be amendment as a policy. Haas says, as a think tank NEAT directly identifies the state interests and illuminates the decision makers about the salient dimensions of the issue. After that the decision makers in one state may, in turn, influence the interests and behavior of other states. Different with another approachment the actor of an epistemic community is an individual states but still sometimes there tends to be a hegemony of idea in the process of policy decision. In balance with Ikenberry theory that if there is any leading state joins an international institution then that sleading state will ripe another weaker state in order to pursues their interests. This research suggests that NEAT should enhance the institutionalization as the first official think tank in APT regionalism."

"In the past several decade's demands for maritime security has increased in significant numbers as indicated by the growing challenge in the seas, promoting various strategic ways to identify problems and to seek the best solutions to the problems. Negotiating a South China Sea conflict settlement and a political solution, at the top political and military level, was an obvious priority for peace-brokers in the conflict area. A quandary of the first track and official diplomatic efforts have pursued the confidence of the government, claimant states, and regional states to negotiate and implement a conflict-settlement agreement. The limitations of the first-track approach have associated with the hard way and a deadlock in making peace and settling the conflict. On the other side, track two or second-track diplomacy (STRAD) played a minimal role in facilitating the signing of a settlement. It, though, served as a reconciliatory effort at the unofficial level. STRAD made a critical contribution to the formal peace process by providing the unarmed actors with an unofficial opportunity to voice their interests in the conflict. Unofficial STRAD efforts conducted outside the officials served to provide an alternative solution with a platform of interaction and engagement."