Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Latar Belakang: Resesi gingiva merupakan salah satu kondisi periodontal yang dapat memberikan perburukan kualitas hidup penderita. Terdapat berbagai metode perawatan resesi gingiva, salah satunya adalah perawatan bedah. Penelitian mengenai preferensi dan persepsi terhadap bahan dalam perawatan bedah pada terapi resesi gingiva belum pernah dilakukan di Indonesia.Tujuan: Mengetahui preferensi dan persepsi Dokter Gigi Spesialis Periodonsia di Indonesia terhadap penggunaan soft tissue matrix pada terapi resesi gingiva. Metode: Penelitian deskriptif dengan pendekatan potong lintang menggunakan kuesioner kepada Dokter Gigi Spesialis Periodonsia di Indonesia. Hasil: Mayoritas Dokter Gigi Spesialis Periodonsia di Indonesia (87,8%) mengerjakan 1-5 kali kasus resesi gingiva dalam satu tahun terakhir Sebagian besar (73,2%) memilih autograft dalam penutupan resesi gingiva. Mayoritas menggunaka soft tissue matrix dalam <50% kasus resesi gingiva yang dikerjakan (48,8%), dengan sediaan berbentuk membran (91,5%). Bahan soft tissue matrix yang paling diminati adalah Acellular dermal matrix (60,1%). Mayoritas menggunakan soft tissue matrix karena kondisi pasien yang tidak memungkinkan untuk cangkok (52,45%) dan biaya yang dikeluarkan lebih besar (53,45%) sebagai alasan untuk tidak menggunakannya. Limitasi terbesar ketika menggunakan soft tissue matrix adalah mukosa berkeratin yang didapat minim (15,9%) dan stabilisasi yang sulit (15,9%). Keseluruhan responden memiliki persepsi yang cenderung positif terhadap soft tissue matrix. Kesimpulan: Mayoritas Dokter Gigi Spesialis Periodonsia di Indonesia memilih autograft pada terapi resesi gingiva dan bahan soft tissue matrix yang paling diminati adalah allograft berupa Acellular dermal matrix. Dokter Gigi Spesialis Periodonsia di Indonesia memiliki persepsi yang cenderung positif terhadap penggunaan soft tissue matrix pada terapi resesi gingiva......Background: Gingival recession is one of the periodontal conditions that can worsen the patient's quality of life. Various methods are available for treating gingival recession, one of which is surgical treatment. No study has evaluated about preferences and perceptions of materials used in the gingival recession treatment in Indonesia. Objective: To evaluate the preferences and perceptions of Indonesian Periodontist for the use of soft tissue matrix as gingival recession treatment. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study using questionnaires given to Periodontists in Indonesia. Results: Most of Periodontist in Indonesia (87.8%) performed 1-5 cases of gingival recession in the past year. Majority (73.2%) chose autograft for treating gingival recession. Most of Periodontist used soft tissue matrix in <50% of the cases treated (48.8%), and chose membranes as the preferred form of matrix (91.5%). The most popular soft tissue matrix material is Acellular dermal matrix (60.1%). Most of Periodontist use soft tissue matrix for reasons related to the patient's condition which contraindicated for grafting (52.45%) and the costs incurred were higher (53.45%) as the most reason not to use it. The greatest limitations when using soft tissue matrix were the keratinized mucosa that obtained is minimal (15.9%) and difficulty in stabilizing the matrix (15.9%). All respondents have a good perception of the soft tissue matrix with an index value of 65.5%. Conclusion: The majority of Periodontist in Indonesia preferred autograft in treating gingival recession. Most demand soft tissue matrix material is allograft in the form of acellular dermal matrix. Periodontist in Indonesia tend to have positive perception in the use of soft tissue matrix as a treatment of gingival recession."

"Latar Belakang: Gigi dengan kerusakan periodontal yang berat akan mengakibatkan peningkatan pada mobilitas gigi. Hal itu menjadi indikasi untuk perawatan splin. Penelitian mengenai distribusi status periodontal pada pasien periodontitis dengan terapi temporary periodontal splint belum pernah dilakukan terutama di Indonesia. Tujuan Penelitian: Mendapatkan distribusi status periodontal gigi pada pasien periodontitis dengan perawatan temporary periodontal splint.Metode: Penelitian deskriptif retrospektif menggunakan data sekunder dari 47 rekam medik dari pasien dengan terapi temporary periodontal splint di klinik Periodonsia RSKGM FKG UI periode 2018-2020. Hasil: Perawatan temporary periodontal splint paling banyak dilakukan pada Regio gigi anterior mandibular (49,8%). Mayoritas mobilitas gigi adalah mobilitas derajat 2 (49,2%).  Mayoritas derajat kerusakan tulang adalah kerusakan hingga 1/3 tengah (49,2%) dengan pola kerusakan terbanyak pola horizontal (62,8%). Kehilangan perlekatan klinis terbanyak adalah buruk (76,8%). Uji-T Berpasangan menunjukan adanya perbedaan bermakna antara indeks plak sebelum dan sesudah 1 minggu perawatan (p<0,05) dengan rerata sesudah 1 minggu lebih rendah dibanding sebelum perawatan. Kesimpulan: Perawatan temporary periodontal splint paling sering dilakukan pada gigi dengan derajat mobilitas 2, kerusakan tulang mencapai 1/3 tengah akar, dan kehilangan perlekatan klinis buruk. Perawatan paling banyak dilakukan pada gigi anterior mandibula. Terdapat perbedaan bermakna antara indeks plak sebelum dan sesudah 1 minggu perawatan dengan indeks plak sesudah mengalami penurunan.

......Background: Tooth with severe periodontal damage will result in an increase in tooth mobility. This tooth will be splint to prevent further damage. There has been no research on the distribution of periodontal status in periodontitis patient who were treated with temporary periodontal splint in Indonesia.

>Objective: Determine the distribution of periodontal status of tooth with periodontitis who were treated with temporary periodontal splints.

Method: This retrospective descriptive study was conducted using 47 periodontal medical record patient who were treated with temporary periodontal splints in RSKGM FKG UI Periodontia clinic period of 2018-2020.

Result: Temporary periodontal splint treatment was mostly performed on the anterior mandible (49,8%). The majority mobility of the tooth are grade 2 mobility (49,2%). Majority degree of bone damage is damage up to middle 1/3 (49.2%) with the most damage pattern is horizontal pattern (62.8%). Most of the clinical attachment loss is poor (76,8%). Dependent T-test result showed that there is a significant difference (p<0,05) between plaque index before and after 1 week of treatment with the mean after 1 week of treatment lower than before treatment.

Conclusion: Temporary periodontal splint treatment is most often performed on teeth with mobility grade 2, bone damage reaching the middle 1/3 of the root, and poor clinical attachment loss. Treatment is mostly done on mandibular anterior teeth. There is a significant difference between the plaque index before and after 1 week of treatment with the plaque index after 1 week decreased."