Konsep pertanggungjawaban pidana dalam hukum pidana internasional analisis konsep pertanggungjawaban individual dalam kasus prosecutor v, thomas lubanga dyilo pada tahun 2012 di international criminal court = The concept of criminal responsibility under international criminal law analysis of the concept of individual criminal responsibility in prosecutor v thomas lubanga dyilo case in 2012 at international criminal court
Ayu Miranda Kosasih;
Adijaya Yusuf, supervisor; Hadi Rahmat Purnama, supervisor; Sidik Suraputra, examiner; Hikmahanto Juwana, examiner; Purba, Achmad Zen Umar, examiner; Warouw, Adolf, examiner; Emmy Yuhassarie Ruru, examiner; Melda Kamil Ariadno, examiner; Arie Afriansyah, examiner
([Publisher not identified]
, 2013)
|
ABSTRAK Skripsi ini membahas mengenai konsep pertanggungjawaban pidanadalam hukum pidana internasional dan secara spesifik membahaskonsep pertanggungjawaban individual yang diatur dalam Statuta Roma.Konsep pertanggungjawaban individual mulai dikenal dalam hukuminternasional moderen pada masa Perang Dunia II tepatnya dalamPeradilan Nuremberg, dengan menghukum individu atas kejahataninternasional. Konsep ini selanjutnya diterapkan di berbagai peradilanpidana internasional. dan mengalami perkembangan dengan munculnyakonsep pertanggungjawaban pimpinan dalam Peradilan Tokyo dankonsep Joint Criminal Enterprise dalam International Court for FormerYugoslavia (ICTY). Konsep pertanggungjawaban individual mengalamiperubahan ketika diterapkan dalam International Criminal Court (ICC)yang terlihat didalam putusan Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo.Dalam putusan tersebut, majelis hakim menyatakan bahwa ThomasLubanga Dyilo bersalah atas kejahatan perang dalam perekrutan tentaraanak dan bertanggung jawab secara individu atas dasar turut melakukan(co-perpetration). ABSTRACT This thesis analyzes the concept of criminal responsibility underinternational criminal law, specifically discusses the individual criminal responsibility under Rome Statute. Individual criminal responsibility was first applied during the Second World War, which was in the Nuremberg Trials. The concept punishes individual for International crimes. The concept of individual criminal responsibility was then applied in various international criminal tribunals, and has developed with the introduction of the concept of superior responsibility in International Military Tribunal for The Far East and the concept of joint criminal enterprise in International Criminal Tribunal for FormerYugoslavia. The concept of criminal responsibility has evolved in theInternational Criminal Court, as it can be seen in Prosecutor v. ThomasLubanga Dyilo Case. The trial chamber punished Thomas LubangaDyilo for the warcrime of recruiting child soldier under co-perpetration. |
S46333 Ayu Miranda Kosasih.pdf :: Unduh
|
No. Panggil : | S46333 |
Entri utama-Nama orang : | |
Entri tambahan-Nama orang : | |
Entri tambahan-Nama badan : | |
Subjek : | |
Penerbitan : | [Place of publication not identified]: [Publisher not identified], 2013 |
Program Studi : |
Bahasa : | ind |
Sumber Pengatalogan : | LibUI ind rda |
Tipe Konten : | text |
Tipe Media : | unmediated ; computer |
Tipe Carrier : | volume ; online resource |
Deskripsi Fisik : | xiv, 109 pages ; 30 cm. + Appendix. |
Naskah Ringkas : | |
Lembaga Pemilik : | Universitas Indonesia |
Lokasi : | Perpustakaan UI, Lantai 3 |
No. Panggil | No. Barkod | Ketersediaan |
---|---|---|
S46333 | 14-20-404423110 | TERSEDIA |
Ulasan: |
Tidak ada ulasan pada koleksi ini: 20346449 |