[ABSTRAK Penelitian ini membahas tentang Proses Kebijakan Pembelian Alutsista Sukhoi padatahun 2003. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui latar belakang yakni kondisi alutsistaIndonesia pasca Embargo Amerika Serikat. Tahap-tahap dan proses tarik-menarikkepentingan di Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (DPR) pada saat itu. Lebih dalam lagi,penelitian ini mengkaji soal anggaran pertahanan, sepesifikasi pesawat sejenis sukhoi,proses-proses persidangan dan konsensus di DPR.Pertanyaan pokok penelitian ini adalah bagaimana kewenangan kementerianperindustrian dan perdagangan dalam proses imbal beli alutsista sukhoi pada tahun 2003?Dan mengapa terjadi tarik-menarik kepentingan (power interplay) panja sukhoi di DPR?.Dengan sub-sub pertanyaan, Bagaimana rancangan anggaran pertahanan pada tahun1999-2004? Apa saja pesawat yang sejenis dengan sukhoi? Bagaimana mekanisme imbalbeli dengan pemerintah Rusia? Mengapa terbentuk panja sukhoi di DPR? Dan bagaimanaproses konsensus antara DPR dan Pemerintah?.Teori utama yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah Teori Kebijakan. Dengan teoripendukung yakni teori kontrol sipil dan teori konsensus. Penelitian ini menggunakanpendekatan kualitatif dengan metode deskriptif analitis untuk menganalisa data-data yangdiperoleh. Pengumpulan data diperoleh dari studi pustaka, observasi dan wawancaramendalam 8 informan dengan background: politisi, peneliti, militer, birokrat danakademisi.Penelitian ini menemukan tentang proses perencanaan pembelian sukhoi yang tidakmatang ditengah kondisi pasca krisis, era reformasi mengharuskan sipil (baca; DPR danMenteri Pertahanan) memiliki otoritas menentukan kebijakan dalam proses pembeliansukhoi tersebut dan proses konsensus dari DPR kemudian direkomendasikan kepemerintah untuk memperbaiki proses pembelian sesuai mekanisme prosedur yangada.Temuan penelitian ini adalah keputusan pemerintah dengan mekanisme imbal beliSukhoi dan komoditi CPO, dimana mekanisme tersebut belum diatur di negara kita.Lebih kepada proses perencanaan yang kurang matang, padahal William Dunn menyebutproses perencanaan bagian dari proses penentuan kebijakan.Implikasi teoritis dalam penelitian ini menguatkan teori Huntington ?civilian controlobjective? bahwaotoritas militer berada dalam otoritas rendah.Pada proses pembeliansukhoi, justru Kementerian Pertahanan yang pada saat itu dijabat oleh sipil yakni (alm)Matori Abdul Jalil tidak dilibatkan dalam proses imbal beli sukhoi tersebut, namundiambil alih oleh Mabes TNI menyalahi prosedur perundang-undangan. Hasil penelitianini adalah proses konsensus sesuai dengan Teori Konsensus Arend Lijphart, dimanamayoritas anggota Komisi I DPR menyetujui untuk mengembalikan kewenangan kepadaKementerian Pertahanan dalam proses pembelian alutsista, bukan KementerianPerdagangan yang menyalahi prosedur. ABSTRACT This study discusses The Process Alutsista Sukhoi Purchasing Policy in 2003. Thepurpose of this study to determine the background of the conditions of armamentsIndonesia after the U.S. embargo. The stages and processes of conflicts of interest in theHouse of Representatives ( DPR ) at the time. More deeply, this study examines thematter of the defense budget, specs similar aircraft Sukhoi, court processes and consensusin Parliament.The central question of this research is how the authority of the ministry of industry andtrade in the process of purchasing defense equipment returns Sukhoi in 2003? And whythe tug of interest (power interplay ) Sukhoi in DPR?. With the sub- sub- questions, Howto draft defense budget in 1999-2004? What are the similar to the Sukhoi aircraft? Howcounter trade mechanism with the Russian government? Why Sukhoi formed in DPR?And how the process of consensus between the Parliament and the Government?.The main theory used in this study is the theory of policy. By supporting the theory ofcivilian control theory and the theory of consensus. This study used a qualitativeapproach with descriptive analytical method to analyze the data obtained. The collectionof data obtained from literature, observation and in-depth interviews with eightinformants background: politicians, researchers, military, bureaucrats and academics.The study found the planning process is not mature Sukhoi purchases amid post-crisisconditions, requires reform era civilian (read: the House of Representatives and theSecretary of Defense) has the authority to determine the policy of the Sukhoi purchaseprocess and consensus process of the House of Representatives and then recommended tothe government to improve the buying process appropriate mechanism ada. ResearchFinding procedures of this study is the government's decision to buy Sukhoi and rewardmechanisms CPO, where such mechanisms have not been regulated in our country. Moreto the planning process are less mature, whereas William Dunn calls this process a part ofthe planning decision-making process.The theoretical implications of this study corroborate the theory of Huntington "objectivecivilian control" military that authority are in the process of purchasing Sukhoi low. Sinceauthority, the Ministry of Defence which is precisely at that time occupied by the civilianMatori Abdul Jalil is not involved in the purchasing process returns the Sukhoi, but wastaken over by the TNI headquarters violated statutory procedures. These results are inaccordance with the consensus process Consensus Theory Arend Lijphart, where themajority of members of Commission I of the House agreed to restore the authority of theMinistry of Defence in the process of purchasing defense equipment, not the Ministry ofCommerce that violated procedures.;This study discusses The Process Alutsista Sukhoi Purchasing Policy in 2003. Thepurpose of this study to determine the background of the conditions of armamentsIndonesia after the U.S. embargo. The stages and processes of conflicts of interest in theHouse of Representatives ( DPR ) at the time. More deeply, this study examines thematter of the defense budget, specs similar aircraft Sukhoi, court processes and consensusin Parliament.The central question of this research is how the authority of the ministry of industry andtrade in the process of purchasing defense equipment returns Sukhoi in 2003? And whythe tug of interest (power interplay ) Sukhoi in DPR?. With the sub- sub- questions, Howto draft defense budget in 1999-2004? What are the similar to the Sukhoi aircraft? Howcounter trade mechanism with the Russian government? Why Sukhoi formed in DPR?And how the process of consensus between the Parliament and the Government?.The main theory used in this study is the theory of policy. By supporting the theory ofcivilian control theory and the theory of consensus. This study used a qualitativeapproach with descriptive analytical method to analyze the data obtained. The collectionof data obtained from literature, observation and in-depth interviews with eightinformants background: politicians, researchers, military, bureaucrats and academics.The study found the planning process is not mature Sukhoi purchases amid post-crisisconditions, requires reform era civilian (read: the House of Representatives and theSecretary of Defense) has the authority to determine the policy of the Sukhoi purchaseprocess and consensus process of the House of Representatives and then recommended tothe government to improve the buying process appropriate mechanism ada. ResearchFinding procedures of this study is the government's decision to buy Sukhoi and rewardmechanisms CPO, where such mechanisms have not been regulated in our country. Moreto the planning process are less mature, whereas William Dunn calls this process a part ofthe planning decision-making process.The theoretical implications of this study corroborate the theory of Huntington "objectivecivilian control" military that authority are in the process of purchasing Sukhoi low. Sinceauthority, the Ministry of Defence which is precisely at that time occupied by the civilianMatori Abdul Jalil is not involved in the purchasing process returns the Sukhoi, but wastaken over by the TNI headquarters violated statutory procedures. These results are inaccordance with the consensus process Consensus Theory Arend Lijphart, where themajority of members of Commission I of the House agreed to restore the authority of theMinistry of Defence in the process of purchasing defense equipment, not the Ministry ofCommerce that violated procedures., This study discusses The Process Alutsista Sukhoi Purchasing Policy in 2003. Thepurpose of this study to determine the background of the conditions of armamentsIndonesia after the U.S. embargo. The stages and processes of conflicts of interest in theHouse of Representatives ( DPR ) at the time. More deeply, this study examines thematter of the defense budget, specs similar aircraft Sukhoi, court processes and consensusin Parliament.The central question of this research is how the authority of the ministry of industry andtrade in the process of purchasing defense equipment returns Sukhoi in 2003? And whythe tug of interest (power interplay ) Sukhoi in DPR?. With the sub- sub- questions, Howto draft defense budget in 1999-2004? What are the similar to the Sukhoi aircraft? Howcounter trade mechanism with the Russian government? Why Sukhoi formed in DPR?And how the process of consensus between the Parliament and the Government?.The main theory used in this study is the theory of policy. By supporting the theory ofcivilian control theory and the theory of consensus. This study used a qualitativeapproach with descriptive analytical method to analyze the data obtained. The collectionof data obtained from literature, observation and in-depth interviews with eightinformants background: politicians, researchers, military, bureaucrats and academics.The study found the planning process is not mature Sukhoi purchases amid post-crisisconditions, requires reform era civilian (read: the House of Representatives and theSecretary of Defense) has the authority to determine the policy of the Sukhoi purchaseprocess and consensus process of the House of Representatives and then recommended tothe government to improve the buying process appropriate mechanism ada. ResearchFinding procedures of this study is the government's decision to buy Sukhoi and rewardmechanisms CPO, where such mechanisms have not been regulated in our country. Moreto the planning process are less mature, whereas William Dunn calls this process a part ofthe planning decision-making process.The theoretical implications of this study corroborate the theory of Huntington "objectivecivilian control" military that authority are in the process of purchasing Sukhoi low. Sinceauthority, the Ministry of Defence which is precisely at that time occupied by the civilianMatori Abdul Jalil is not involved in the purchasing process returns the Sukhoi, but wastaken over by the TNI headquarters violated statutory procedures. These results are inaccordance with the consensus process Consensus Theory Arend Lijphart, where themajority of members of Commission I of the House agreed to restore the authority of theMinistry of Defence in the process of purchasing defense equipment, not the Ministry ofCommerce that violated procedures.] |