Erosinya doktrin consideration di common law studi perbandingan terhadap perjanjian civil law = The erosion of the doctrine of consideration in common law a comparative study to civil law contracts
(Universitas Indonesia, 2014)
|
[Skripsi ini membahas erosinya doktrin consideration di common law. Walaupunconsideration adalah salah satu syarat sah perjanjian di common law, considerationbukanlah suatu syarat sah perjanjian di civil law. Consideration dibandingkan denganhukum Indonesia sebagai representasi dari sistem civil law. Konsep consideration itusendiri di common law telah ditemukan sebagai problematik dan tidak tetap. Isuutama dari consideration sebagai syarat sah perjanjian adalah considerationmencegah pelaksanaan janji tanpanya. Sebagai cara menghindari permasalahan ini,hakim-hakim di common law mengupayakan berbagai pengecualian dan alternatif dariconsideration. Seiring dengan peningkatan penggunaan pengecualian dan alternatifuntuk consideration, erosi terjadi. Dalam pengertian ini hukum perjanjian di commonlaw menjadi mirip dengan civil law, yang tidak pernah menyaratkan consideration.Penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa ketika menghadapi pilihan hukum antara civil dancommon law seseorang harus menyadari perbedaan persyaratan contract., This research discusses the eroding doctrine of consideration in the common law.Although consideration is one of the requirements of a valid contract in the commonlaw, it is not required in civil law contracts. Therefore the concept of consideration incommon law is compared to Indonesian law, which is a representative of the civil lawsystem. In fact, the very concept of consideration in the common law has been foundto be problematic and non-rigid. The main issue with consideration, as a requirementof contract, is that it halts the enforcement of promises lacking consideration. As away around this problem, judges in common law often resort to various exemptionsand alternatives to consideration. Along with the increased usage of exemptions andalternatives to consideration, the doctrine of consideration has eroded. In this sensecontract law in common law has become somewhat similar to that of civil law, whichnever required consideration for contracts in the first place. This research suggest thatwhen facing a choice of legal system between common and civil law, one must beaware of the differences in the contractual requirements.] |
![]()
|
No. Panggil : | S56044 |
Subjek : | |
Penerbitan : | [Place of publication not identified]: Universitas Indonesia, 2014 |
Program Studi : |
Bahasa : | eng |
Sumber Pengatalogan : | |
Tipe Konten : | |
Tipe Media : | |
Tipe Carrier : | |
Deskripsi Fisik : | x, 81 hlm. ; 30 cm. |
Naskah Ringkas : | |
Lembaga Pemilik : | Universitas Indonesia |
Lokasi : | Perpustakaan UI, Lantai 3 |
No. Panggil | No. Barkod | Ketersediaan |
---|---|---|
S56044 | TERSEDIA |
Ulasan: |
Tidak ada ulasan pada koleksi ini: 20388048 |