Tinjauan yuridis larangan praktek diskriminasi pelaku usaha terhadap pelaku usaha tertentu dalam undang-undang nomor 5 tahun 1999 (studi kasus putusan KPPU No. 05/KPPU-I/2012 tentang kasus tender export pipeline front end engineering and design contract) = Juridical analysis of discriminative practices prohibition which conduct by business actors to the certain business actors under act no 5 1999 case study decision of kppu no 05 kppu i 2012 / Josua Septian
Josua Septian;
Sarjiyani, supervisor; Aritonang, Parulian Paidi, examiner; Teddy A. Anggoro, examiner; Wenny Setiawati, examiner
(Universitas Indonesia, 2014)
|
|
ABSTRAK Skripsi ini membahas mengenai ketentuan larangan praktek diskriminasi pelakuusaha terhadap pelaku usaha tertentu yang diatur dalam Pasal 19 huruf d Undang-Undang No.5 Tahun 1999. Peneliti dalam hal ini mengambil contoh kasus dariputusan KPPU No.05/KPPU-I/2012 tentang praktek diskriminasi yang dilakukan olehPT.Chevron Indonesia Company dalam tender export pipeline front end engineeringdan design contract di lingkungan PT.Chevron Indonesia Company. Penelitian inidilakukan bersifat yuridis normatif dengan meneliti praktek diskriminasi berdasarkanteori dan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku. Hasil penelitian ini padaakhirnya menyarankan pihak KPPU untuk lebih memperjelas kriteria praktekdiskriminasi yang dilarang dan dalam memutus sebuah perkara terkait diskriminasipelaku usaha pihak KPPU harus lebih memperhatikan pembuktian atas segala unsurunsurlarangan praktek diskriminasi sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 19 huruf d,terlebih unsur “menyebabkan persaingan usaha yang tidak sehat” dalam kasus terkait ABSTRACT This thesis explains about the prohibition of discriminative practice which conduct bya business actor to the certain business actors which regulated in article 19 paragraphd of Act No.5 /1999. Researcher in this thesis takes the Comission decision No.05/KPPU-I/2012 concerning discriminative practices which has conducted byChevron Indonesia Company in the tender of Export Pipeline Front End Engineeringand Design Contract as a case study. This thesis was conducted by examining thenormative juridical practice of discrimination based on theory and legislation in force.The results of this study ultimately recommends the commission to improve andclarify the criteria and practice of discrimination, beside that in deciding a caserelated discriminative practices, the comission (KPPU) should pay more attentionabout the fulfillment of all elements of the prohibition of discrimination under article19 paragraph d Act No.5/1999, especially the element of “causing unfaircompetition” in the relevant cases |
 S57540-Josua Septian.pdf :: Unduh
|
| No. Panggil : | S57540 |
| Entri utama-Nama orang : | |
| Entri tambahan-Nama orang : | |
| Subjek : | |
| Penerbitan : | [Place of publication not identified]: Universitas Indonesia, 2014 |
| Program Studi : |
| Bahasa : | ind |
| Sumber Pengatalogan : | LibUI ind rda |
| Tipe Konten : | text |
| Tipe Media : | unmediated ; computer |
| Tipe Carrier : | volume ; online resource |
| Deskripsi Fisik : | xiii, 155 pages : illustration ; 28 cm + appendix |
| Naskah Ringkas : | |
| Lembaga Pemilik : | Universitas Indonesia |
| Lokasi : | Perpustakaan UI, Lantai 3 |
| No. Panggil | No. Barkod | Ketersediaan |
|---|---|---|
| S57540 | TERSEDIA |
| Ulasan: |
| Tidak ada ulasan pada koleksi ini: 20388317 |
