ABSTRAK Komplikasi diabetes melitus terjadi pada makrovaskuler yaitu komplikasi yangmengenai pembuluh arteri yang lebih besar, sehingga menyebabkan atheroslerosis,akibatnya menyebabkan ulkus diabetikum. Penelitin ini bertujuan untukmembandingkan instrumen bates jensen antara langsung dan tidak langsung.Desain penelitian yang digunakan deskriptif kuantitatif dan penelitian Crosssectional.Intrumen penelitian yang digunakan skala Bates Jensen berbentuk skaladeskriptif . Penelitian ini dilakukan di RS Husada, RSPI Sulianti Saroso danWocare Clinic Bogor berjumlah 52 responden , hasil penilaian BWAT direct ratarata31,59 dengan standar devisiasi 9,212 (95% CI 29,03-34,16), hasil penilaianindirect observer I rata-rata 31,76 dengan standar devisiasi 8,7 (095% CI 29,3-34,1), sedangkan hasil penilaian indirect observer II rata-rata 29,4 dengan standardevisiasi 9,1 (95% CI 26,9-32,01). Dengan uji anova disimpulkan tidak adaperbedaan yang signifikan antara penilaian direct indirect. Penelitian inimerekomendasikan penilaian indirect sebagai alat untuk berkonsultasi pengobatanulkus diabetikum. ABSTRACT Complications of diabetes mellitus that occurs in macrovascular complications ofthe larger arteries, causing atheroslerosis, consequently causing diabetic ulcers.This research is aimed to compare the instruments bates jensen between direct andindirect. The study design used quantitative descriptive and cross-sectional studies.Scale research instruments used Jensen Bates shaped descriptive scale. This studywas conducted at Hospital Husada, Sulianti Saroso and Wocare Clinic Bogortotaled 52 respondents, direct assessment results bwat 31.59 average with standarddeviation 9.212 (95% CI 29.03 to 34.16), the results of the first observer indirectassessment an average of 31.76 with a standard deviation of 8.7 (095% CI 29.3 to34.1), while the indirect assessment observer II average of 29.4 with a standarddeviation 9.1 (95% CI 26.9 -32.01). With ANOVA test concluded there was nosignificant difference between direct and indirect assessment. The studyrecommends indirect assessment as a tool to consult the treatment of diabetic ulcer. |