[ABSTRAK
Pasal 15 ayat 1 Undang-undang No 2 Tahun 2014 jelas disebutkan bahwa aktaNotaris merupakan akta otentik yang memiliki kekuatan pembuktian yangsempurna. Namun dalam kenyataannya akta Notaris dapat juga dibatalkan dipengadilan. Jika dikemudian hari timbul gugatan atau ada pihak yang menyangkalisi perjanjian yang telah dibuat, diharapkan bisa diselesaikan dengan carakekeluargaan, namun apabila tidak mencapai kesepakatan, demi keadilan dapatmengajukan upaya hukum. Upaya hukum yang dimaksudkan adalah pengajuanperkara atau gugatan ke Pengadilan Negeri setempat. Atas dasar hal tersebutmuncul permasalahan antara lain Apakah notaris sebagai Pejabat Umum yangmembuat akta sesuai syarat formil ditinjau dari Undang-Undang RepublikIndonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris mempunyai perlindungan hukum atasakta yang dibuatnya ? Dan Apakah putusan pengadilan dapat membatalkan aktapersetujuan membuka kredit nomor 118 tanggal 30 November 2009 yang dibuatoleh notaris H. Subandi,S.H berdasarkan putusan Pengadilan Negeri No117/Pdt.G/2011/PN.KPJ, tanggal 17 Oktober 2011? Dalam menjawab pertanyaantersebut penulis melakukan penelitian dengan menggunakan metode penelitian,pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan penelitian deskriptif analitis,serta menggunakan sumber data sekunder kemudian didapat hasil penelitianbahwa Perlindungan hukum terhadap notaris yang dijadikan turut tergugat hanyabertanggung jawab atas syarat formil suatu pembuatan akta. Akibat hukum dariputusan pengadilan yang dijatuhkan oleh Pengadilan terhadap Notaris bahwanotaris tidak dapat dikatakan telah melakukan pelanggaran terhadap pembuatanakta perjanjian tersebut, karena apa yang dituangkan dalam suatu akta notarisadalah kehendak dari para pihak. Dalam kasus putusan Pengadilan NegeriKepanjen nomor 117/Pdt.G/2011/PN.KPJ, tanggal 17 Oktober 2011, Notaris tidakdapat dipersalahkan karena Notaris dalam membuat akta persetujuan kredit telahmemenuhi syarat-syarat formil dan materil pembuatan akta, sehingga putusanpengadilan tidak dapat membatalkan akta notaris.
ABSTRACT
Article 15 (1) Law of Republic Indonesia No 2 of 2014 Amendments Act No. 30of 2004 clearly mentioned that the notarial deed is authentic act which certainlyhas probative force perfect, but in reality notarial deed can also be canceled incourt. If the claim arises in the future, or there are those who deny that theagreement has been made, is expected to be completed by way of the family, butif it does not reach an agreement for the sake of justice may file legal action.Remedies are intended litigation or lawsuit to the District Court on the basis thatproblems arise, among others, Whether the issue arises as a notary as a publicofficial who made the appropriate deed formal requirements in terms of the Lawof the Republic of Indonesia No. 2 of 2014 Amendments Act No. 30 of 2004 onnotary office has the legal protection of the deed he made no 118 dated 30November 2009 ? And Whether the court?s decision to invalidate a deed no 118dated 30 November 2009 made by a notary, H. Subandi, S.H. in associated withthe decision of the district court Kepanjen 117/Pdt.G/2011/PN.KPJ, date ofOctober 17, 2011? In answering these questions the authors conducted a researchstudy using normative juridical approach using descriptive analytical research, aswell as the use of secondary data sources and then obtained the results of researchthat legal protection against the notary who made co-defendant was onlyresponsible for a formal deed. Legal effect of the court decision handed down bythe Court to the notary that the notary can not be said to have violated theagreement deed, because what is stated in a notarial deed is the will of the parties.In case the decision of the district court Kepanjen number117/Pdt.G/2011/PN.KPJ, date of October 17, 2011, notary could not beprosecuted because he has fulfilled the terms of the formal and material deed, sothat the court can not annul the decision of the notarial deed.;Article 15 (1) Law of Republic Indonesia No 2 of 2014 Amendments Act No. 30of 2004 clearly mentioned that the notarial deed is authentic act which certainlyhas probative force perfect, but in reality notarial deed can also be canceled incourt. If the claim arises in the future, or there are those who deny that theagreement has been made, is expected to be completed by way of the family, butif it does not reach an agreement for the sake of justice may file legal action.Remedies are intended litigation or lawsuit to the District Court on the basis thatproblems arise, among others, Whether the issue arises as a notary as a publicofficial who made the appropriate deed formal requirements in terms of the Lawof the Republic of Indonesia No. 2 of 2014 Amendments Act No. 30 of 2004 onnotary office has the legal protection of the deed he made no 118 dated 30November 2009 ? And Whether the court’s decision to invalidate a deed no 118dated 30 November 2009 made by a notary, H. Subandi, S.H. in associated withthe decision of the district court Kepanjen 117/Pdt.G/2011/PN.KPJ, date ofOctober 17, 2011? In answering these questions the authors conducted a researchstudy using normative juridical approach using descriptive analytical research, aswell as the use of secondary data sources and then obtained the results of researchthat legal protection against the notary who made co-defendant was onlyresponsible for a formal deed. Legal effect of the court decision handed down bythe Court to the notary that the notary can not be said to have violated theagreement deed, because what is stated in a notarial deed is the will of the parties.In case the decision of the district court Kepanjen number117/Pdt.G/2011/PN.KPJ, date of October 17, 2011, notary could not beprosecuted because he has fulfilled the terms of the formal and material deed, sothat the court can not annul the decision of the notarial deed., Article 15 (1) Law of Republic Indonesia No 2 of 2014 Amendments Act No. 30of 2004 clearly mentioned that the notarial deed is authentic act which certainlyhas probative force perfect, but in reality notarial deed can also be canceled incourt. If the claim arises in the future, or there are those who deny that theagreement has been made, is expected to be completed by way of the family, butif it does not reach an agreement for the sake of justice may file legal action.Remedies are intended litigation or lawsuit to the District Court on the basis thatproblems arise, among others, Whether the issue arises as a notary as a publicofficial who made the appropriate deed formal requirements in terms of the Lawof the Republic of Indonesia No. 2 of 2014 Amendments Act No. 30 of 2004 onnotary office has the legal protection of the deed he made no 118 dated 30November 2009 ? And Whether the court’s decision to invalidate a deed no 118dated 30 November 2009 made by a notary, H. Subandi, S.H. in associated withthe decision of the district court Kepanjen 117/Pdt.G/2011/PN.KPJ, date ofOctober 17, 2011? In answering these questions the authors conducted a researchstudy using normative juridical approach using descriptive analytical research, aswell as the use of secondary data sources and then obtained the results of researchthat legal protection against the notary who made co-defendant was onlyresponsible for a formal deed. Legal effect of the court decision handed down bythe Court to the notary that the notary can not be said to have violated theagreement deed, because what is stated in a notarial deed is the will of the parties.In case the decision of the district court Kepanjen number117/Pdt.G/2011/PN.KPJ, date of October 17, 2011, notary could not beprosecuted because he has fulfilled the terms of the formal and material deed, sothat the court can not annul the decision of the notarial deed.] |
T42121-Amazia Fetriansjah Kusumaningtyas.pdf :: Unduh