[ABSTRAK Perkembangan perekonomian di Indonesia, menuntut adanya kecepatan, danefisiensi dalam bertransaksi. Hal ini menyebabkan munculnya kelalaian parapebisnis terhadap perlindungan hukum yang ada. tesis ini akan membahas sebuahkasus dimana terdapat seorang investor yang menanamkan modalnya dalamsebuah perseroan terbatas dan mendapatkan keuntungan sesuai dengan proporsimodal yang ia setorkan. Akan tetapi kesepakatan yang dijalankan dibangun tanpaadanya kesepakatan tertulis. Notaris dalam hal ini yang berfungsi sebagai pejabatumum pembuat akta otentik dituntut agar dapat memberikan perlindungan hukum.Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah dengan melakukan studi literatur danstudi kasus. Hasilnya adalah penelitian terhadap kasus membuktikan bahwa halyang terjadi tidak berkaitan dengan saham atas nama seperti terdapat dalamUndang-Undang Penanaman Modal, sehingga pembentukan perjanjian menjadisah. Selain itu, suatu akta otentik dapat dibuat tidak hanya terbatas pada perjanjiannominat, namun juga pada perjanjian inominat, dan Notaris memiliki kewenanganuntuk mengakomodasi kepentingan para pihak kedalam suatu perjanjian.Kesimpulannya adalah, Notaris selain mempunya kewajiban memberikanpenyuluhan hukum, Notaris juga harus bisa memberikan jalan keluar terhadappermasalahan yang dihadapi oleh kliennya, sepanjang memenuhi ketentuanperundang-undangan. ABSTRACT The economic developments in Indonesia, demanding speed and efficiency in thetransaction. This led to the emergence of the negligence of businessmen to theprotection of laws. This thesis will discuss a case in which there is an investorwho invest in a limited liability company and earn profits in proportion to thecapital which it deposited. But the deal is executed built without a writtenagreement. Notary in this case that serves as a public official deed authenticrequired in order to provide legal protection. The method used is to conduct astudy of literature and case studies. The result is a study of the case proves that ithappens not relating to the shares on behalf of such contained in the InvestmentAct, so that the formation of the agreement becomes valid. In addition, anauthentic deed can be made not only limited to nominate agreement, but also onin nominate agreement, and Notary has the authority to accommodate theinterests of the parties into an agreement. The conclusion is, Notary in additionpossessed legal obligation to provide counseling, notary also must be able toprovide solutions to problems faced by his client, that they meet the statutoryprovisions;The economic developments in Indonesia, demanding speed and efficiency in thetransaction. This led to the emergence of the negligence of businessmen to theprotection of laws. This thesis will discuss a case in which there is an investorwho invest in a limited liability company and earn profits in proportion to thecapital which it deposited. But the deal is executed built without a writtenagreement. Notary in this case that serves as a public official deed authenticrequired in order to provide legal protection. The method used is to conduct astudy of literature and case studies. The result is a study of the case proves that ithappens not relating to the shares on behalf of such contained in the InvestmentAct, so that the formation of the agreement becomes valid. In addition, anauthentic deed can be made not only limited to nominate agreement, but also onin nominate agreement, and Notary has the authority to accommodate theinterests of the parties into an agreement. The conclusion is, Notary in additionpossessed legal obligation to provide counseling, notary also must be able toprovide solutions to problems faced by his client, that they meet the statutoryprovisions, The economic developments in Indonesia, demanding speed and efficiency in thetransaction. This led to the emergence of the negligence of businessmen to theprotection of laws. This thesis will discuss a case in which there is an investorwho invest in a limited liability company and earn profits in proportion to thecapital which it deposited. But the deal is executed built without a writtenagreement. Notary in this case that serves as a public official deed authenticrequired in order to provide legal protection. The method used is to conduct astudy of literature and case studies. The result is a study of the case proves that ithappens not relating to the shares on behalf of such contained in the InvestmentAct, so that the formation of the agreement becomes valid. In addition, anauthentic deed can be made not only limited to nominate agreement, but also onin nominate agreement, and Notary has the authority to accommodate theinterests of the parties into an agreement. The conclusion is, Notary in additionpossessed legal obligation to provide counseling, notary also must be able toprovide solutions to problems faced by his client, that they meet the statutoryprovisions] |