Pemulihan hutan adat sebagai hak ulayat pasca putusan mahkamah konstitusi Nomor 35/PUU-X/2012 = recovery of indigenous forest as communal rights a post verdict constitutional court Number 35/PUU-X/2012
Agus Warsito;
Hamid Chalid, supervisor; Fatmawati, examiner; Fitra Arsil, examiner; Mustafa Fakhri, examiner
(Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2014)
|
[ABSTRAK Penulisan tesis ini berangkat dari Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor35/PUU-X/2012 terkait uji meteri beberapa pasal dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 41Tahun 1999 tentang Kehutanan karena dianggap bertentangan dengan ketentuanketentuanyang ada dalam UUD Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Salah satuputusan penting Mahkamah Konstitusi adalah mengubah Pasal 1 angka 6 denganmenghapus kata ?negara? sehingga menjadi ?hutan adat adalah hutan yang beradadalam wilayah masyarakat hukum adat?. Dengan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusitersebut, status hutan adat dipulihkan kembali menjadi salah satu obyek hak ulayatdalam wilayah masyarakat hukum adat. Dengan banyaknya pengakuan atau klaimdari masyarakat hukum adat atas hutan adat, maka diperlukan analisis mengenaipemulihan hutan adat sebagai hak ulayat pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor35/PUU-X/2012, khususnya terkait kriteria kepemilikan hutan adat sebagai hakulayat dalam konsep negara kesatuan, status kepemilikan atas tanah dan izin padahutan adat serta mekanisme dan peran pemerintah dalam rangka pemulihan hutanadat sebagai hak ulayat. Metodologi yang digunakan yaitu studi normatif dan empirisdengan model deskriptif kualitatif. Hasil penelitian memperlihatkan bahwa untukmembuktikan kepemilikan hutan adat sebagai hak ulayat masyarakat hukum adatdiperlukan penelitian terhadap keberlangsungan penguasaan dan penggunaan hutanadat baik sebagai tempat tinggal maupun tempat memenuhi kebutuhan hidup sehariharidan tidak hanya sekedar pengakuan atau klaim semata. Hasil penelitian tersebutmerupakan salah satu dasar pengakuan masyarakat hukum adat dan hak ulayatnyaoleh Pemerintah Daerah melalui Peraturan Daerah, dan selanjutnya menjadi rujukanbagi Pemerintah Pusat untuk menetapkan hutan adat sebagai hak ulayat masyarakathukum adat. Dengan penetapan hutan adat sebagai hak ulayat tidak ternyatamenghapus hak-hak pihak lain atas tanah maupun izin yang diperoleh sebelumpenetapan hutan adat. Kesimpulan penting dari hasil analisis yaitu penetapan hutanadat sebagai hak ulayat harus sesuai prinsip-prinsip negara kesatuan dengan batasanbatasanyang telah ditentukan baik dalam UU Kehutanan maupun UU tentangPeraturan Dasar Pokok-pokok Agraria. ABSTRACT This thesis departs from the decision of the Constitutional Court number35/PUU-X/2012 related judicial test several articles in Law No. 41 of 1999 onForestry because it is contrary to the provisions contained in the Constitution of theRepublic of Indonesia in 1945. With the decision of the Constitutional Court, thestatus of indigenous forests restored into one of the objects within the jurisdiction ofcommunal rights of indigenous peoples. With so many confessions or claims ofindigenous people on indigenous forests, it would require an analysis of the recoveryof the communal rights of indigenous forest after the Constitutional Court decisionnumber 35/PUU-X/2012, particularly related to the ownership criteria as communalrights of indigenous forest in the concept of the unitary state, status of land ownershipand permissions on indigenous forests and the mechanisms and the role ofgovernment in order to recovery the communal rights of indigenous forest. Themethodology used is normative study with qualitative descriptive models. The resultsof the study showed that to prove ownership of indigenous forests as communal rightsof indigenous people needed research on the sustainability of communal tenure andforest use either as a residence or a place to meet the needs of everyday life and notjust a mere acknowledgment or claim. The results of these studies is one of the basicrecognition of customary laws and communal rights by local governments throughlocal legislation, and subsequently became a reference for the central government toestablish communal rights of indigenous forest as indigenous peoples. Thedetermination of customary rights of indigenous forest as it turns out doesn?t removethe rights of other to land and permission obtained before the establishment ofindigenous forests. Important conclusion from the analysis is the determination of thecommunal rights of indigenous forest should be according to the principles of theunitary state with the limits specified either in the forestry laws and regulation lawson agrarian basis points.;This thesis departs from the decision of the Constitutional Court number35/PUU-X/2012 related judicial test several articles in Law No. 41 of 1999 onForestry because it is contrary to the provisions contained in the Constitution of theRepublic of Indonesia in 1945. With the decision of the Constitutional Court, thestatus of indigenous forests restored into one of the objects within the jurisdiction ofcommunal rights of indigenous peoples. With so many confessions or claims ofindigenous people on indigenous forests, it would require an analysis of the recoveryof the communal rights of indigenous forest after the Constitutional Court decisionnumber 35/PUU-X/2012, particularly related to the ownership criteria as communalrights of indigenous forest in the concept of the unitary state, status of land ownershipand permissions on indigenous forests and the mechanisms and the role ofgovernment in order to recovery the communal rights of indigenous forest. Themethodology used is normative study with qualitative descriptive models. The resultsof the study showed that to prove ownership of indigenous forests as communal rightsof indigenous people needed research on the sustainability of communal tenure andforest use either as a residence or a place to meet the needs of everyday life and notjust a mere acknowledgment or claim. The results of these studies is one of the basicrecognition of customary laws and communal rights by local governments throughlocal legislation, and subsequently became a reference for the central government toestablish communal rights of indigenous forest as indigenous peoples. Thedetermination of customary rights of indigenous forest as it turns out doesn’t removethe rights of other to land and permission obtained before the establishment ofindigenous forests. Important conclusion from the analysis is the determination of thecommunal rights of indigenous forest should be according to the principles of theunitary state with the limits specified either in the forestry laws and regulation lawson agrarian basis points., This thesis departs from the decision of the Constitutional Court number35/PUU-X/2012 related judicial test several articles in Law No. 41 of 1999 onForestry because it is contrary to the provisions contained in the Constitution of theRepublic of Indonesia in 1945. With the decision of the Constitutional Court, thestatus of indigenous forests restored into one of the objects within the jurisdiction ofcommunal rights of indigenous peoples. With so many confessions or claims ofindigenous people on indigenous forests, it would require an analysis of the recoveryof the communal rights of indigenous forest after the Constitutional Court decisionnumber 35/PUU-X/2012, particularly related to the ownership criteria as communalrights of indigenous forest in the concept of the unitary state, status of land ownershipand permissions on indigenous forests and the mechanisms and the role ofgovernment in order to recovery the communal rights of indigenous forest. Themethodology used is normative study with qualitative descriptive models. The resultsof the study showed that to prove ownership of indigenous forests as communal rightsof indigenous people needed research on the sustainability of communal tenure andforest use either as a residence or a place to meet the needs of everyday life and notjust a mere acknowledgment or claim. The results of these studies is one of the basicrecognition of customary laws and communal rights by local governments throughlocal legislation, and subsequently became a reference for the central government toestablish communal rights of indigenous forest as indigenous peoples. Thedetermination of customary rights of indigenous forest as it turns out doesn’t removethe rights of other to land and permission obtained before the establishment ofindigenous forests. Important conclusion from the analysis is the determination of thecommunal rights of indigenous forest should be according to the principles of theunitary state with the limits specified either in the forestry laws and regulation lawson agrarian basis points.] |
T41573-Agus Warsito.pdf :: Unduh
|
No. Panggil : | T41573 |
Entri utama-Nama orang : | |
Entri tambahan-Nama orang : | |
Entri tambahan-Nama badan : | |
Subjek : | |
Penerbitan : | Jakarta: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2014 |
Program Studi : |
Bahasa : | ind |
Sumber Pengatalogan : | |
Tipe Konten : | text |
Tipe Media : | unmediated ; computer |
Tipe Carrier : | volume ; online resource |
Deskripsi Fisik : | xiii, 173 pages : iilustration ; 28 cm + appendix |
Naskah Ringkas : | |
Lembaga Pemilik : | Universitas Indonesia |
Lokasi : | Perpustakaan UI, Lantai 3 |
No. Panggil | No. Barkod | Ketersediaan |
---|---|---|
T41573 | 15-17-583860474 | TERSEDIA |
Ulasan: |
Tidak ada ulasan pada koleksi ini: 20389250 |