[ABSTRAK
Penelitian ini berfokus pada dampak kebijakan luar negeri terhadap identitaskolektif suatu negara dengan menggunakan disain penelitian studi kasus dimanakasus yang digunakan adalah hubungan internasional di Semenanjung Korea.Analisis dilakukan melalui dua tahap: (1) analisis pada kebijakan luar negeri yangberfokus pada hasil kebijakan luar negeri, (2) analisis yang menjelaskan hasilkebijakan luar negeri pada empat aspek identitas kolektif: ketergantungan,kesenasiban, keseragaman, dan ketahanan diri. Kesimpulan dari penelitian iniadalah kebijakan Trust Building Process Korea Selatan dan kebijakandenuklirisasi Amerika Serikat serta Tiongkok terhadap Korea Utara mempunyaipengaruh pada identitas kolektif Korea Selatan;
ABSTRACT
This study focuses on the impact of foreign policies toward a state?s collectiveidentity. The study was conducted by implementing a case study design whichused international relation in Korea peninsula as the main case. The data of thestudy was analyzed in two phases: first, analysis focused on the outcomes ofSouth Korea?s, China?s, and the U.S.? foreign policies and, second, analysis on theresults of the foreign policies in four aspects of collective identity, which areinterdependence, common fate, homogeneity, and self-restrain. Eventually, thestudy concludes that South Korea?s Trust Building Process policy, as well as theU.S.? and China?s denuclearization policy toward North Korea had an influenceon South Korea?s collective identity;This study focuses on the impact of foreign policies toward a state?s collectiveidentity. The study was conducted by implementing a case study design whichused international relation in Korea peninsula as the main case. The data of thestudy was analyzed in two phases: first, analysis focused on the outcomes ofSouth Korea?s, China?s, and the U.S.? foreign policies and, second, analysis on theresults of the foreign policies in four aspects of collective identity, which areinterdependence, common fate, homogeneity, and self-restrain. Eventually, thestudy concludes that South Korea?s Trust Building Process policy, as well as theU.S.? and China?s denuclearization policy toward North Korea had an influenceon South Korea?s collective identity;This study focuses on the impact of foreign policies toward a state’s collectiveidentity. The study was conducted by implementing a case study design whichused international relation in Korea peninsula as the main case. The data of thestudy was analyzed in two phases: first, analysis focused on the outcomes ofSouth Korea’s, China’s, and the U.S.’ foreign policies and, second, analysis on theresults of the foreign policies in four aspects of collective identity, which areinterdependence, common fate, homogeneity, and self-restrain. Eventually, thestudy concludes that South Korea’s Trust Building Process policy, as well as theU.S.’ and China’s denuclearization policy toward North Korea had an influenceon South Korea’s collective identity, This study focuses on the impact of foreign policies toward a state’s collectiveidentity. The study was conducted by implementing a case study design whichused international relation in Korea peninsula as the main case. The data of thestudy was analyzed in two phases: first, analysis focused on the outcomes ofSouth Korea’s, China’s, and the U.S.’ foreign policies and, second, analysis on theresults of the foreign policies in four aspects of collective identity, which areinterdependence, common fate, homogeneity, and self-restrain. Eventually, thestudy concludes that South Korea’s Trust Building Process policy, as well as theU.S.’ and China’s denuclearization policy toward North Korea had an influenceon South Korea’s collective identity] |
T42508-Maulana Putra.pdf :: Unduh