[ABSTRAK
Indonesia di bawah kepemimpinan Soeharto adalah sebuah periode sejarahbangsa dimana seluruh potensi nasional (kementerian dan lembaga) tersubordinasidalam konteks politik saat itu. ABRI yang merupakan salah satu elemen palingvital dalam menjalankan roda pemerintahan Orde Baru dan pendukung utamaGolkar dengan konsep Dwi Fungsinya akhirnya terlibat jauh dalam urusan-urusanpolitik. Dengan itu, seluruh institusi intelijen yang berada di bawah naunganABRI baik secara langsung dan tak langsung terpolitisasi oleh kepentinganSoeharto sebagai pengguna intelijen (user) dan penentu kebijakan (policy maker).Dalam sebuah negara yang dikelola secara otoriter dengan kepemimpinan yangdiktator akhirnya menjadikan institusi intelijen sebagai sebuah lembaga ?intelijenpolitik?, selain itu, seluruh institusi intelijen mengalami ?militerisasi? dengan tidakadanya diferensiasi intelijen yang membawa negara dalam bentuk ?negaraintelijen?. Politisasi institusi intelijen di masa orde baru terjadi dari berbagaispektrum baik dari sudut pandang pengguna, analis, aktivitas maupun organisasiintelijen. Di periode ini, intelijen bekerja sesuai dengan preferensi politik pribadipengguna intelijen.Untuk menghindari politisasi dan penyalahgunaan intelijen, diperlukansebuah mekanisme yang dapat mengatur pengawasan terhadap badan intelijensesuai dengan prinsip-prinsip negara demokrasi. Netralitas dan penguatan strukturlembaga intelijen dapat dilakukan dengan mekanisme pengawasan yang dilakukanoleh parlemen sesuai yang telah dimandatkan undang-undang. Pengawasan olehbadan pengawas intelijen akan bekerja untuk mengawasi aktivitas, operasi danpenganggaran yang terkait dengan intelijen.
ABSTRACT
Indonesia under Suharto was a historic period in which all of nationalpotential (ministries and agencies) subordinated in the current political context .Armed Forces (ABRI) which is one of the most vital element in running the NewOrder regime and the Golkar major supporter of the concept of Dwi Fungsi deeplyinvolved in political affairs. With that, the entire intelligence institutions under theauspices of the Armed Forces (ABRI), both directly and indirectly by the interestsof Suharto as politicized intelligence users and policy makers. In an authoritarianstate run by a dictator leadership eventually make intelligence institutions as aninstitution 'political intelligence', other than that, the whole experience intelligenceinstitutions 'militarization' in the absence of differentiation of intelligence thatbrings the state in the form of 'intelligence state'. Politicization of intelligence inthe new order of the various spectrum occurs from the standpoint of users,analysts, and the activities of intelligence and organizations. In this period,intelligence work in accordance with the user's personal political preferences .To avoid politicization and misuse of intelligence, we need a mechanismthat can manage the oversight of intelligence services in accordance with theprinciples of democracy. Neutrality and strengthening the structure of theintelligence agencies can be mechanisms of control by the appropriateparliamentary legislation mandated. Supervision by the oversight body will workto oversee intelligence activities, operations and budgeting related to intelligence;Indonesia under Suharto was a historic period in which all of nationalpotential (ministries and agencies) subordinated in the current political context .Armed Forces (ABRI) which is one of the most vital element in running the NewOrder regime and the Golkar major supporter of the concept of Dwi Fungsi deeplyinvolved in political affairs. With that, the entire intelligence institutions under theauspices of the Armed Forces (ABRI), both directly and indirectly by the interestsof Suharto as politicized intelligence users and policy makers. In an authoritarianstate run by a dictator leadership eventually make intelligence institutions as aninstitution 'political intelligence', other than that, the whole experience intelligenceinstitutions 'militarization' in the absence of differentiation of intelligence thatbrings the state in the form of 'intelligence state'. Politicization of intelligence inthe new order of the various spectrum occurs from the standpoint of users,analysts, and the activities of intelligence and organizations. In this period,intelligence work in accordance with the user's personal political preferences .To avoid politicization and misuse of intelligence, we need a mechanismthat can manage the oversight of intelligence services in accordance with theprinciples of democracy. Neutrality and strengthening the structure of theintelligence agencies can be mechanisms of control by the appropriateparliamentary legislation mandated. Supervision by the oversight body will workto oversee intelligence activities, operations and budgeting related to intelligence, Indonesia under Suharto was a historic period in which all of nationalpotential (ministries and agencies) subordinated in the current political context .Armed Forces (ABRI) which is one of the most vital element in running the NewOrder regime and the Golkar major supporter of the concept of Dwi Fungsi deeplyinvolved in political affairs. With that, the entire intelligence institutions under theauspices of the Armed Forces (ABRI), both directly and indirectly by the interestsof Suharto as politicized intelligence users and policy makers. In an authoritarianstate run by a dictator leadership eventually make intelligence institutions as aninstitution 'political intelligence', other than that, the whole experience intelligenceinstitutions 'militarization' in the absence of differentiation of intelligence thatbrings the state in the form of 'intelligence state'. Politicization of intelligence inthe new order of the various spectrum occurs from the standpoint of users,analysts, and the activities of intelligence and organizations. In this period,intelligence work in accordance with the user's personal political preferences .To avoid politicization and misuse of intelligence, we need a mechanismthat can manage the oversight of intelligence services in accordance with theprinciples of democracy. Neutrality and strengthening the structure of theintelligence agencies can be mechanisms of control by the appropriateparliamentary legislation mandated. Supervision by the oversight body will workto oversee intelligence activities, operations and budgeting related to intelligence] |
T-Diyauddin.pdf :: Unduh