[ABSTRAK
Tesis dengan judul Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Hak PT. Wijaya Karya (Persero)Tbk yang Belum Terpenuhi Selaku Kreditor Pasca Pembagian Boedel Pailit PT. UE ASSA(Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 410 k/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2013) dilatarbelakangi oleh PT. Wijaya Karya yang mengajukan kasasi kepada Mahkamah Agung atasputusan Pengadilan Niaga Surabaya Nomor 08/PLW.Pailit/2013/PN.Niaga Sby jo Nomor.07/PKPU/2011/PN Sby tanggal 22 April 2013 karena PT. Wijaya Karya menganggap,bahwa putusan Pengadilan Niaga Surabaya tersebut sangat tidak adil oleh karena dalamputusan pailit PT. Wijaya Karya hanya menerima bagian 0,28% dari boedel pailit PT. UEASSA atau sebesar Rp. 2.149.802.062,47 dari seluruh piutang sebesar Rp.112.835.211.143,00. Yang menjadi pokok permasalahan adalah: 1. Bagaimanakahkedudukan tanggungjawab perusahaan beserta seluruh jajaran pengurus PT. UE ASSAdalam melunasi seluruh hutangnya terhadap PT. Wijaya Karya ditinjau dari UU PerseroanTerbatas dan UU Kepailitan? 2. Bagaimanakah upaya hukum yang dapat dilakukan olehPT. Wijaya Karya dalam memperoleh seluruh hak yang belum terpenuhi pasca putusanMA Nomor. 410.K/Pdt-Sus.Pailit/2013? Dengan dinyatakan pailit, pengurusan hartakekayaan PT. UE ASSA beralih kepada kurator. Kepailitan PT. UE ASSA pada prinsipnyatidak mengakibatkan PT. UE ASSA kehilangan haknya untuk mengurus dan menguasaiharta kekayaannya dan tidak mengakibatkan terhentinya aktivitas PT. UE ASSA, olehkarena dalam kepailitan PT. UE ASSA kewenangan Direksi beralih kepada kurator yangkemudian dapat bertindak sebagai Direksi untuk mengelola PT. UE ASSA.Pertanggungjawaban PT. UE ASSA merupakan pertanggungjawaban secara timbal balik,sehingga yang dijatuhi putusan pailit adalah perseroannya dan bukan Direksi sepanjangDireksi tidak bertindak melawan hukum. Ada beberapa Upaya hukum yang dapatdilakukan untuk memperoleh seluruh haknya, yaitu PT. Wijaya Karya dapat melakukanupaya: a. Melakukan upaya Peninjauan Kembali dan b. Melakukan upaya actio pauliana.Bentuk penelitian tesis ini adalah yuridis normatif, dengan tipologi penelitian bersifatdeskriptif analitis, jenis data berupa data sekunder, alat pengumpulan data berupa studidokumen, sedangkan pengolahan dan analisis data berdasarkan pendekatan yuridisnormatif.
ABSTRACT
Thesis with the title of the Legal Overview of the Rights PT. Wijaya Karya (Persero) TbkAs Remaining Bankruptcy Creditors Post Boedel division of PT. UE ASSA (Case StudySupreme Court Decision No. 410 k / Pdt.Sus - Bankrupt / 2013 ) against the background byPT. Wijaya Karya who has filed an appeal to the Supreme Court against the decision ofSurabaya Commercial Court No. 08 / PLW.Pailit / 2013 / PN.Niaga SBY jo No. 07 / PKPU/ 2011 / PN SBY April 22 of 2013 as PT. Wijaya Karya assume , that the SurabayaCommercial Court decision is very unfair because of the bankruptcy decision PT . WijayaKarya only receive a portion of 0.28 % of boedel bankrupt PT. UE ASSA or Rp.2149802062,47 of all receivables amounting to Rp . 112,835,211,143.00. The main issueare : 1. What is the status of the responsibilities of the company and the whole range of theboard of PT.UE ASSA to repay the entire debt to PT . Wijaya Karya based on the LimitedLiability Company Law and Bankruptcy Law? 2. What is the remedy which can be done byPT. Wijaya Karya in obtaining all the rights that have not been fulfilled after the SupremeCourt decision number. 410.K / Pdt - Sus.Pailit / 2013 ? By declared bankrupt, themaintenance of the assets of PT. UE ASSA switch to the curator. PT. UE ASSA?sbankruptcyin principle does not result in PT. UE ASSA loses its right to administer andcontrol of its assets and did not effect in the cessation of the activity of PT. UE ASSA, sincein the bankruptcy of PT. UE ASSA authority of the Board of Directors switch to the curatorwho can then act as the Board of Directors to manage PT. UE ASSA. Responsibility PT.UE ASSA is a reciprocal responsibility, so the company sentenced for bankruptcy, not theDirectors as long as the Directors did not act unlawfully. There are several legal remediesthat can be done to obtain the rights, PT Wijaya Karya can: a. Conducting a JudicialReview and b. Conducting an actio pauliana. The form of this thesis research is normativejuridical, with typology analytical descriptive study, the type of data in the form ofsecondary data, data collection tools such as the study of documents, while the processingand analysis of data based on a normative juridical approach.;Thesis with the title of the Legal Overview of the Rights PT. Wijaya Karya (Persero) TbkAs Remaining Bankruptcy Creditors Post Boedel division of PT. UE ASSA (Case StudySupreme Court Decision No. 410 k / Pdt.Sus - Bankrupt / 2013 ) against the background byPT. Wijaya Karya who has filed an appeal to the Supreme Court against the decision ofSurabaya Commercial Court No. 08 / PLW.Pailit / 2013 / PN.Niaga SBY jo No. 07 / PKPU/ 2011 / PN SBY April 22 of 2013 as PT. Wijaya Karya assume , that the SurabayaCommercial Court decision is very unfair because of the bankruptcy decision PT . WijayaKarya only receive a portion of 0.28 % of boedel bankrupt PT. UE ASSA or Rp.2149802062,47 of all receivables amounting to Rp . 112,835,211,143.00. The main issueare : 1. What is the status of the responsibilities of the company and the whole range of theboard of PT.UE ASSA to repay the entire debt to PT . Wijaya Karya based on the LimitedLiability Company Law and Bankruptcy Law? 2. What is the remedy which can be done byPT. Wijaya Karya in obtaining all the rights that have not been fulfilled after the SupremeCourt decision number. 410.K / Pdt - Sus.Pailit / 2013 ? By declared bankrupt, themaintenance of the assets of PT. UE ASSA switch to the curator. PT. UE ASSA?sbankruptcyin principle does not result in PT. UE ASSA loses its right to administer andcontrol of its assets and did not effect in the cessation of the activity of PT. UE ASSA, sincein the bankruptcy of PT. UE ASSA authority of the Board of Directors switch to the curatorwho can then act as the Board of Directors to manage PT. UE ASSA. Responsibility PT.UE ASSA is a reciprocal responsibility, so the company sentenced for bankruptcy, not theDirectors as long as the Directors did not act unlawfully. There are several legal remediesthat can be done to obtain the rights, PT Wijaya Karya can: a. Conducting a JudicialReview and b. Conducting an actio pauliana. The form of this thesis research is normativejuridical, with typology analytical descriptive study, the type of data in the form ofsecondary data, data collection tools such as the study of documents, while the processingand analysis of data based on a normative juridical approach., Thesis with the title of the Legal Overview of the Rights PT. Wijaya Karya (Persero) TbkAs Remaining Bankruptcy Creditors Post Boedel division of PT. UE ASSA (Case StudySupreme Court Decision No. 410 k / Pdt.Sus - Bankrupt / 2013 ) against the background byPT. Wijaya Karya who has filed an appeal to the Supreme Court against the decision ofSurabaya Commercial Court No. 08 / PLW.Pailit / 2013 / PN.Niaga SBY jo No. 07 / PKPU/ 2011 / PN SBY April 22 of 2013 as PT. Wijaya Karya assume , that the SurabayaCommercial Court decision is very unfair because of the bankruptcy decision PT . WijayaKarya only receive a portion of 0.28 % of boedel bankrupt PT. UE ASSA or Rp.2149802062,47 of all receivables amounting to Rp . 112,835,211,143.00. The main issueare : 1. What is the status of the responsibilities of the company and the whole range of theboard of PT.UE ASSA to repay the entire debt to PT . Wijaya Karya based on the LimitedLiability Company Law and Bankruptcy Law? 2. What is the remedy which can be done byPT. Wijaya Karya in obtaining all the rights that have not been fulfilled after the SupremeCourt decision number. 410.K / Pdt - Sus.Pailit / 2013 ? By declared bankrupt, themaintenance of the assets of PT. UE ASSA switch to the curator. PT. UE ASSA’sbankruptcyin principle does not result in PT. UE ASSA loses its right to administer andcontrol of its assets and did not effect in the cessation of the activity of PT. UE ASSA, sincein the bankruptcy of PT. UE ASSA authority of the Board of Directors switch to the curatorwho can then act as the Board of Directors to manage PT. UE ASSA. Responsibility PT.UE ASSA is a reciprocal responsibility, so the company sentenced for bankruptcy, not theDirectors as long as the Directors did not act unlawfully. There are several legal remediesthat can be done to obtain the rights, PT Wijaya Karya can: a. Conducting a JudicialReview and b. Conducting an actio pauliana. The form of this thesis research is normativejuridical, with typology analytical descriptive study, the type of data in the form ofsecondary data, data collection tools such as the study of documents, while the processingand analysis of data based on a normative juridical approach.] |
T43033-Putri Sekar Langit.pdf :: Unduh