Kedudukan anak luar kawin ditinjau dari pasal 43 undang-undang nomor 1 tahun 1974 tentang perkawinan (analisis penetapan pengadilan negeri nomor: 55/PDT.P/2014/PN.JKT.TIM = Status of illegitimate child in view of article 43 law number 1 year 1974 concerning marriage (analysis to determination of district court number 55/PDT.P/2014/PN.JKT.TIM)
Situmorang, Deffi Arrester Putri;
Surini Ahlan Sjarif, supervisor; Rosa Agustina, examiner; Siti Hajati Hoesin, examiner
([Publisher not identified]
, 2015)
|
[ABSTRAK Perkawinan adalah ikatan lahir batin antara seorang pria dan seorang wanita dengantujuan untuk membentuk keluarga yang bahagia dan kekal berdasarkan keTuhananYang Maha Esa. Penulis berasumsi bahwa salah satu tujuan perkawinan adalah untukmendapatkan keturunan atau anak. Dalam penelitian ini pokok permasalahan yangpenulis angkat adalah mengenai kedudukan anak luar kawin ditinjau dari Pasal 43Undang-Undang Nomor 1 tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan dan analisis terhadapPenetapan Pengadilan Negeri Nomor : 55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.Jkt.Tim. Penulismenggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif. Pasal 43 Undang-Undang Nomor 1tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan menyatakan bahwa anak luar kawin hanya memilikihubungan hukum dengan ibu dan keluarga ibunya. Tindakan hukum yang dapatdilakukan anak luar kawin memiliki hubungan hukum dengan ayah dan keluargaayahnya adalah melalui pengakuan terhadap anak luar kawin dan pengesahan anakluar kawin pada saat perkawinan kedua orangtuanya. Dalam Penetapan PengadilanNegeri Nomor : 55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.Jkt.Tim orang tua dari anak luar kawin tidakmelakukan pengesahan terhadap anak luar kawin mereka pada saat perkawinan,sehingga meminta penetapan pengadilan negeri. Pengakuan dan Pengesahan Anakyang telah melebihi jangka waktu yang telah ditetapkan Pasal 49 dan Pasal 50Undang-Undang Nomor 24 tahun 2013 tentang Perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor23 tahun 2006 tentang Administrasi Kependudukan harus melalui PenetapanPengadilan Negeri. Penulis setuju dengan pertimbangan hukum hakim dalamPenetapan Pengadilan Negeri Nomor : 55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.Jkt.Tim. ABSTRACT Marriage is born inner bond between a man and a woman with the aim to a form ahappy family and eternal based on one supreme divinity. The authors assume that oneof purposes of marriage is to obtain offspring or children. The issue that i use is onthe position of illegitimate child in view of Article 43 of Law Number 1 year 1974concerning marriage and analysis to determination of district court number55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.JKT.TIM. The autor uses the methode of normative legal research.Article 43 of Law number 1 year 1974 on marriage states that an illegitimate childonly has a legal relationship with mother and her family. Legal actions that can bedone to an illegitimate child has a legal relationship with his father and his father?sfamily is throught the recognition and validation of an illegitimate child at the time ofhis parents marriage. If parents of an illegitimate child negligent conduct agains anillegitimate child endorsement, can be done in state court determination as describedin Article 32 paragraph 2 of Law number 26 year 2006 concerning administration ofresidence. In determination of district court number: 55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.Jkt.Tim anillegitimate child?s parents do not approve of the marriage of their children at the timeof marriage, so requast a court warrant. Recognation and validation of child who hasexceeded a predetermined time period Article 49 and Article 50 of Law Number 24year 2013 concerning changes to the Law number of 2006 concerning administrationof residence must go through a court warrant. Autors agrees with the legalconsiderations in determination of district court number 55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.JKT.TIM.;Marriage is born inner bond between a man and a woman with the aim to a form ahappy family and eternal based on one supreme divinity. The authors assume that oneof purposes of marriage is to obtain offspring or children. The issue that i use is onthe position of illegitimate child in view of Article 43 of Law Number 1 year 1974concerning marriage and analysis to determination of district court number55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.JKT.TIM. The autor uses the methode of normative legal research.Article 43 of Law number 1 year 1974 on marriage states that an illegitimate childonly has a legal relationship with mother and her family. Legal actions that can bedone to an illegitimate child has a legal relationship with his father and his father?sfamily is throught the recognition and validation of an illegitimate child at the time ofhis parents marriage. If parents of an illegitimate child negligent conduct agains anillegitimate child endorsement, can be done in state court determination as describedin Article 32 paragraph 2 of Law number 26 year 2006 concerning administration ofresidence. In determination of district court number: 55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.Jkt.Tim anillegitimate child?s parents do not approve of the marriage of their children at the timeof marriage, so requast a court warrant. Recognation and validation of child who hasexceeded a predetermined time period Article 49 and Article 50 of Law Number 24year 2013 concerning changes to the Law number of 2006 concerning administrationof residence must go through a court warrant. Autors agrees with the legalconsiderations in determination of district court number 55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.JKT.TIM.;Marriage is born inner bond between a man and a woman with the aim to a form ahappy family and eternal based on one supreme divinity. The authors assume that oneof purposes of marriage is to obtain offspring or children. The issue that i use is onthe position of illegitimate child in view of Article 43 of Law Number 1 year 1974concerning marriage and analysis to determination of district court number55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.JKT.TIM. The autor uses the methode of normative legal research.Article 43 of Law number 1 year 1974 on marriage states that an illegitimate childonly has a legal relationship with mother and her family. Legal actions that can bedone to an illegitimate child has a legal relationship with his father and his father?sfamily is throught the recognition and validation of an illegitimate child at the time ofhis parents marriage. If parents of an illegitimate child negligent conduct agains anillegitimate child endorsement, can be done in state court determination as describedin Article 32 paragraph 2 of Law number 26 year 2006 concerning administration ofresidence. In determination of district court number: 55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.Jkt.Tim anillegitimate child?s parents do not approve of the marriage of their children at the timeof marriage, so requast a court warrant. Recognation and validation of child who hasexceeded a predetermined time period Article 49 and Article 50 of Law Number 24year 2013 concerning changes to the Law number of 2006 concerning administrationof residence must go through a court warrant. Autors agrees with the legalconsiderations in determination of district court number 55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.JKT.TIM., Marriage is born inner bond between a man and a woman with the aim to a form ahappy family and eternal based on one supreme divinity. The authors assume that oneof purposes of marriage is to obtain offspring or children. The issue that i use is onthe position of illegitimate child in view of Article 43 of Law Number 1 year 1974concerning marriage and analysis to determination of district court number55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.JKT.TIM. The autor uses the methode of normative legal research.Article 43 of Law number 1 year 1974 on marriage states that an illegitimate childonly has a legal relationship with mother and her family. Legal actions that can bedone to an illegitimate child has a legal relationship with his father and his father’sfamily is throught the recognition and validation of an illegitimate child at the time ofhis parents marriage. If parents of an illegitimate child negligent conduct agains anillegitimate child endorsement, can be done in state court determination as describedin Article 32 paragraph 2 of Law number 26 year 2006 concerning administration ofresidence. In determination of district court number: 55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.Jkt.Tim anillegitimate child’s parents do not approve of the marriage of their children at the timeof marriage, so requast a court warrant. Recognation and validation of child who hasexceeded a predetermined time period Article 49 and Article 50 of Law Number 24year 2013 concerning changes to the Law number of 2006 concerning administrationof residence must go through a court warrant. Autors agrees with the legalconsiderations in determination of district court number 55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.JKT.TIM.] |
![]()
|
No. Panggil : | T43046 |
Entri utama-Nama orang : | |
Entri tambahan-Nama orang : | |
Entri tambahan-Nama badan : | |
Subjek : | |
Penerbitan : | [Place of publication not identified]: [Publisher not identified], 2015 |
Program Studi : |
Bahasa : | ind |
Sumber Pengatalogan : | LibUI ind rda |
Tipe Konten : | text |
Tipe Media : | unmediated ; computer |
Tipe Carrier : | volume ; online resource |
Deskripsi Fisik : | xi, 62 pages; 30 cm |
Naskah Ringkas : | |
Lembaga Pemilik : | Universitas Indonesia |
Lokasi : | Perpustakaan UI, Lantai 3 |
No. Panggil | No. Barkod | Ketersediaan |
---|---|---|
T43046 | 15-18-533897814 | TERSEDIA |
Ulasan: |
Tidak ada ulasan pada koleksi ini: 20403733 |