[ABSTRAK
Perubahan aturan single presence policy telah memberikan opsi baru bagipemerintah selaku pemegang saham pengendali bank BUMN dalam mematuhiaturan kepemilikan tunggal tersebut. tujuan dari peneletian ini adalah untukmeneliti perubahan peraturan single presence policy tersebut bagi bank BUMN diIndonesia serta meneliti opsi terbaik bagi bank BUMN dalam melaksanakanaturan single presence policy tersebut dengan menggunakan metode penelitianyuridis normatif.Dari perubahan kebijakan single presence policy ini telah memberikanopsi baru berupa fungsi holding menggantikan opsi divestasi saham pada aturansingle presence policy sebelumnya, dari perubahan tersebut, bank BUMN dalamrangka melaksanakan kebijakan single presence policy tersebut, Opsi bankholding company dinilai lebih baik mengingat fokus usaha dari bank-bank BUMNyang berbeda.Dalam mencapai efisiensi bank dan demi mematuhi aturan single presencepolicy, maka Opsi terbaik bagi bank BUMN dari segi akibat hukum adalah bankholding company dimana bank BUMN tidak perlu bergabung menjadi satuperusahaan sehingga penerapan opsi tersebut sebaiknya dilaksanakan secepatmungkin apalagi kita sedang dihadapkan dengan masyarakat ekonomi ASEANdimana perbankan yang kuat dan efisien sangat dibutuhkan.
ABSTRACT
Change the rules of the single presence policy has provided a new optionfor the government as the controlling shareholder of state banks in the solepossession abide by the rules. this research purpose is to examine the changes inthe rules of the single presence policy for state-owned banks in Indonesia andresearching the best options for state-owned banks in implementing the singlepresence policy rules using normative juridical research.change of single presence policy change has provided new options in theform of a holding function replaces divestiture option on the single presencepolicy rules previously, of the amendment, the state bank in order to carry out thepolicy of the single presence policy, the bank holding company optionsconsidered better considering the focus of business from state-owned banks aredifferent.In achieving the efficiency of banks and to comply with the rules of thesingle presence policy, then the best option for the state bank in terms of legalconsequences is a bank holding company in which state owned banks do not needto be merged into one company so that the application of these options should beimplemented as soon as possible especially we are faced with economic societyASEAN where a strong and efficient banking is needed.;Change the rules of the single presence policy has provided a new optionfor the government as the controlling shareholder of state banks in the solepossession abide by the rules. this research purpose is to examine the changes inthe rules of the single presence policy for state-owned banks in Indonesia andresearching the best options for state-owned banks in implementing the singlepresence policy rules using normative juridical research.change of single presence policy change has provided new options in theform of a holding function replaces divestiture option on the single presencepolicy rules previously, of the amendment, the state bank in order to carry out thepolicy of the single presence policy, the bank holding company optionsconsidered better considering the focus of business from state-owned banks aredifferent.In achieving the efficiency of banks and to comply with the rules of thesingle presence policy, then the best option for the state bank in terms of legalconsequences is a bank holding company in which state owned banks do not needto be merged into one company so that the application of these options should beimplemented as soon as possible especially we are faced with economic societyASEAN where a strong and efficient banking is needed.;Change the rules of the single presence policy has provided a new optionfor the government as the controlling shareholder of state banks in the solepossession abide by the rules. this research purpose is to examine the changes inthe rules of the single presence policy for state-owned banks in Indonesia andresearching the best options for state-owned banks in implementing the singlepresence policy rules using normative juridical research.change of single presence policy change has provided new options in theform of a holding function replaces divestiture option on the single presencepolicy rules previously, of the amendment, the state bank in order to carry out thepolicy of the single presence policy, the bank holding company optionsconsidered better considering the focus of business from state-owned banks aredifferent.In achieving the efficiency of banks and to comply with the rules of thesingle presence policy, then the best option for the state bank in terms of legalconsequences is a bank holding company in which state owned banks do not needto be merged into one company so that the application of these options should beimplemented as soon as possible especially we are faced with economic societyASEAN where a strong and efficient banking is needed., Change the rules of the single presence policy has provided a new optionfor the government as the controlling shareholder of state banks in the solepossession abide by the rules. this research purpose is to examine the changes inthe rules of the single presence policy for state-owned banks in Indonesia andresearching the best options for state-owned banks in implementing the singlepresence policy rules using normative juridical research.change of single presence policy change has provided new options in theform of a holding function replaces divestiture option on the single presencepolicy rules previously, of the amendment, the state bank in order to carry out thepolicy of the single presence policy, the bank holding company optionsconsidered better considering the focus of business from state-owned banks aredifferent.In achieving the efficiency of banks and to comply with the rules of thesingle presence policy, then the best option for the state bank in terms of legalconsequences is a bank holding company in which state owned banks do not needto be merged into one company so that the application of these options should beimplemented as soon as possible especially we are faced with economic societyASEAN where a strong and efficient banking is needed.] |
T42866-Afdal.pdf :: Unduh