[ABSTRAK
Pertumbuhan penduduk, pertumbuhan ekonomi dan urbanisasi di kota- kota besardi negara berkembang seperti Jakarta menyebabkan timbulan/generasi sampahsemakin meningkat. Sementara itu kapasitas TPA semakin menurun. Untukmengatasi permasalahan tersebut diperlukan upaya pengurangan sampah sejakdari sumbernya. TPS 3R dapat mengurangi volume sampah yang diangkut dandibuang ke TPA melalui pengomposan dan daur ulang pada skala kawasan.Namun demikian TPS 3R sangat mengandalkan peran serta masyarakat dalambentuk retribusi sampah dan pemilahan sampah sejak dari sumbernya. MetodeChoice Modeling (CM) dan Contingent Valuation (CV) digunakan untukmengetahui WTP masyarakat atas beragam pilihan layanan sampah berbasis 3R.CM digunakan untuk mengestimasi harga implisit tiap atribut layanan sepertiaroma TPS, pemilahan dan frekuensi pengumpulan sampah. Hasil CMmenunjukkan pemilahan sampah dari sumber masih merupakan beban bagi rumahtangga sedangkan aroma TPS yang semakin tidak bau dan pemilahan sampah diTPS menambah utilitas rumah tangga. Secara keseluruhan rumah tangga ternyatamemberikan penilaian yang cukup tinggi pada layanan manajemen sampahberbasis 3R. Dengan membandingkan potensi pendapatan dengan biaya layananmanajemen sampah tiap skenario, ditemukan bahwa tingkat cost recovery layananmanajemen sampah ramah lingkungan/TPS 3R lebih tinggi dibandingkan layanankonvensional. Dengan adanya tingkat cost recovery yang lebih tinggi dansejumlah eksternalitas positif yang dapat diperoleh, tidak ada alasan bagi pemdauntuk tidak mendukung layanan manajemen sampah berbasis 3R.
ABSTRACT
Population,economic growth and urbanization in big cities in developing countrieslike Jakarta cause proliferating growth in solid waste generation. Meanwhilelandfill capacity is diminishing. To overcome this problem, efforts to reducewaste from the source are needed. Solid waste intermediate treatment facilitiesbased on 3R principles (TPS 3R) can reduce waste which must be transported anddisposed through communal composting and recycling. However TPS 3R relieson community participation in the form of waste retribution and at-source-wastesorting.Choice Modelling (CM) and Contingent Valuation (CV) are used to elicitconsumers? willingness to pay (WTP) for different service options. The CMespecially aims to estimate the implicit price for each service attribute such as theTPS odour, at source waste sorting and collection frequency. CM results indicateat-source-waste-sorting is still a burden for households while the diminishing badodour and waste sorting in TPS add household utilities. Overall household turnedout to give a fairly high valuation on 3R-based solid waste management services.By comparing the potential service fee revenue with its operational cost in eachscenario, it was found that the cost recovery rate of ecological solid wastemanagement service/TPS 3R is higher than the conventional one. With higher costrecovery rate and a number of positive externalities that can be obtained, there isno reason for the government not to support 3R-based solid waste managementservice/TPS 3R.;Population,economic growth and urbanization in big cities in developing countrieslike Jakarta cause proliferating growth in solid waste generation. Meanwhilelandfill capacity is diminishing. To overcome this problem, efforts to reducewaste from the source are needed. Solid waste intermediate treatment facilitiesbased on 3R principles (TPS 3R) can reduce waste which must be transported anddisposed through communal composting and recycling. However TPS 3R relieson community participation in the form of waste retribution and at-source-wastesorting.Choice Modelling (CM) and Contingent Valuation (CV) are used to elicitconsumers? willingness to pay (WTP) for different service options. The CMespecially aims to estimate the implicit price for each service attribute such as theTPS odour, at source waste sorting and collection frequency. CM results indicateat-source-waste-sorting is still a burden for households while the diminishing badodour and waste sorting in TPS add household utilities. Overall household turnedout to give a fairly high valuation on 3R-based solid waste management services.By comparing the potential service fee revenue with its operational cost in eachscenario, it was found that the cost recovery rate of ecological solid wastemanagement service/TPS 3R is higher than the conventional one. With higher costrecovery rate and a number of positive externalities that can be obtained, there isno reason for the government not to support 3R-based solid waste managementservice/TPS 3R.;Population,economic growth and urbanization in big cities in developing countrieslike Jakarta cause proliferating growth in solid waste generation. Meanwhilelandfill capacity is diminishing. To overcome this problem, efforts to reducewaste from the source are needed. Solid waste intermediate treatment facilitiesbased on 3R principles (TPS 3R) can reduce waste which must be transported anddisposed through communal composting and recycling. However TPS 3R relieson community participation in the form of waste retribution and at-source-wastesorting.Choice Modelling (CM) and Contingent Valuation (CV) are used to elicitconsumers’ willingness to pay (WTP) for different service options. The CMespecially aims to estimate the implicit price for each service attribute such as theTPS odour, at source waste sorting and collection frequency. CM results indicateat-source-waste-sorting is still a burden for households while the diminishing badodour and waste sorting in TPS add household utilities. Overall household turnedout to give a fairly high valuation on 3R-based solid waste management services.By comparing the potential service fee revenue with its operational cost in eachscenario, it was found that the cost recovery rate of ecological solid wastemanagement service/TPS 3R is higher than the conventional one. With higher costrecovery rate and a number of positive externalities that can be obtained, there isno reason for the government not to support 3R-based solid waste managementservice/TPS 3R., Population,economic growth and urbanization in big cities in developing countrieslike Jakarta cause proliferating growth in solid waste generation. Meanwhilelandfill capacity is diminishing. To overcome this problem, efforts to reducewaste from the source are needed. Solid waste intermediate treatment facilitiesbased on 3R principles (TPS 3R) can reduce waste which must be transported anddisposed through communal composting and recycling. However TPS 3R relieson community participation in the form of waste retribution and at-source-wastesorting.Choice Modelling (CM) and Contingent Valuation (CV) are used to elicitconsumers’ willingness to pay (WTP) for different service options. The CMespecially aims to estimate the implicit price for each service attribute such as theTPS odour, at source waste sorting and collection frequency. CM results indicateat-source-waste-sorting is still a burden for households while the diminishing badodour and waste sorting in TPS add household utilities. Overall household turnedout to give a fairly high valuation on 3R-based solid waste management services.By comparing the potential service fee revenue with its operational cost in eachscenario, it was found that the cost recovery rate of ecological solid wastemanagement service/TPS 3R is higher than the conventional one. With higher costrecovery rate and a number of positive externalities that can be obtained, there isno reason for the government not to support 3R-based solid waste managementservice/TPS 3R.] |
T43008-siti fatimah .pdf :: Unduh