Perbedaan jumlah ekstrusi debri ke periapeks pada preparasi saluran akar dengan protaper dan protaper next (eksperimental laboratorik) = The difference in the amount of debris extrusion between protaper and protaper next instrumentation
Rininta Aprilia Kasdjono;
Munyati Usman, supervisor; Bambang Nursasongko, supervisor; Narlan Sumawinata, examiner; Endang Suprastiwi, examiner; RA Nilakusuma Djauharie, examiner
(Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Indonesia, 2014)
|
Latar Belakang: Selama preparasi kemomekanis, umumnya terjadi ekstrusi debri ke periapeks yang dapat memicu respon inflamasi dan memperlambat penyembuhan jaringan periapeks. ProTaper® dilaporkan menyebabkan banyak esktrusi debri, dan belum ada data mengenai ekstrusi debri oleh generasi barunya, ProTaper Next® Tujuan: Menganalisis jumlah ekstrusi debri pada gigi yang dipreparasi dengan ProTaper® dan ProTaper Next®. Metode: Enam puluh gigi premolar dibagi dalam dua kelompok (kelompok ProTaper® dan ProTaper Next®) sama besar. Ekstrusi debri pada preparasi ditampung dalam tabung, dan perbedaan berat tabung sebelum preparasi dan sesudah preparasi merupakan jumlah debri terekstrusi Hasil: kelompok ProTaper® menghasilkan debri lebih banyak daripada kelompok ProTaper Next®. Secara statistik (t-test) perbedaanya bermakna (p<0,005). Kesimpulan: jumlah debri pada preparasi dengan ProTaper Next® lebih sedikit daripada pada preparasi dengan ProTaper. Background: debris extrusion during chemomechanical preparation could trigger inflammatory response and delay periapical healing. Instrumentation with ProTaper® is reported to cause significant debris extrusion, while no data available with ProTaper Next®. Objective: to analyze the amount of debris extruded in instrumentation with ProTaper® and ProTaper Next®. Methods: sixty premolars were divided evenly into two groups; the first group was instrumented with ProTaper® and the other one with ProTaper Next®. Debris ekstruded during instrumentation was collected in a bottle and the difference between the weight of the bottle before and after intrumentation was considered as the amount of debris extrusion. Results: debris extrusion by instrumentation with ProTaper® was greater than instrumentation with ProTaper Next®, and statistically significant (t-test, p<0,005). Conclusion: the amount of debris extrusion produced by ProTaper Next® was less than produced by ProTaper® |
T-Rininta Aprilia Kasdjono.pdf :: Unduh
|
No. Panggil : | T-Pdf |
Entri utama-Nama orang : | |
Entri tambahan-Nama orang : | |
Subjek : | |
Penerbitan : | Jakarta: Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Indonesia, 2014 |
Program Studi : |
Bahasa : | ind |
Sumber Pengatalogan : | LibUI ind rda |
Tipe Konten : | text |
Tipe Media : | computer |
Tipe Carrier : | online resource |
Deskripsi Fisik : | xv, 59 pages : illustration ; 28 cm + appendix |
Naskah Ringkas : | |
Lembaga Pemilik : | Universitas Indonesia |
Lokasi : | Perpustakaan UI, Lantai 3 |
No. Panggil | No. Barkod | Ketersediaan |
---|---|---|
T-Pdf | 15-17-027860113 | TERSEDIA |
Ulasan: |
Tidak ada ulasan pada koleksi ini: 20403869 |