Full Description

Cataloguing Source LibUI ind rda
Content Type text (rdacontent)
Media Type unmediated (rdamedia); computer (rdamedia)
Carrier Type volume (rdacarrier); online resource (rdacarrier)
Physical Description xi, 106 pages : illustration ; 28 cm + appendix
Concise Text
Holding Institution Universitas Indonesia
Location Perpustakaan UI, Lantai 3
 
  •  Availability
  •  Digital Files: 1
  •  Review
  •  Cover
  •  Abstract
Call Number Barcode Number Availability
S60781 14-23-39018618 TERSEDIA
No review available for this collection: 20412657
 Abstract
Kasus ini terfokus pada surat wasiat dari Alm. Tan Malaka, yang telah meninggal pada tahun 2011. Saat membuat surat wasiat, Alm. Tan Malaka tengah sakit keras, dan kondisinya membawa keraguan pada kecakapan bertindaknya. Gangguan kesehatan seperti penyakit atau cedera memang dapat mempengaruhi kecakapan bertindak, akan tetapi harus dibuktikan terlebih dahulu bahwa akal pikirannya ikut terganggu. Selain itu, dalam pasal 898 KUH Perdata disertai doktrin, bukti-bukti tentang kecakapan bertindak pemuat wasiat harus diambil yang sedekat mungkin dengan waktu pembuatan surat wasiat. Perkara ini memiliki tiga putusan, dan berakhir dengan Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor: 3124/K/Pdt/2013 yang membatalkan surat wasiat, akan tetapi ditemukan hal yang kurang tepat di tingkat Pengadilan Negeri, Pengadilan Tinggi, dan Mahkamah Agung. ...... This case focuses on the testament from Tan Malaka, who died on 2011. When making the will, Tan Malaka had chronic illness, and his condition brought doubts about his legal capacity. Physical problems like illness and injury doues affect one?s capacity to act, but it must be proven first that one?s mind has been affected. In addition, the article 898 of Indonesian Civil Code along with law doctrines state that the proofs about legal capacity of testator must be taken as close as possible from the time of will making. This case has three decisions, and it took conclusion with Supreme Court Decision Number: 3124/K/Pdt/2013which cancelled the testament, but it has been found that the cancellation has some inaccuracies at both District Court, High Court, and Supreme Court.