Reformulasi penyelesaian sengketa dan perselisihan hasil pemilihan umum oleh kekuasaan kehakiman berbasis electoral justice system di indonesia = Reformulation of electoral dispute and election result dispute settlement by judicial power based on electoral justice system in Indonesia
Muhammad Imam Nasef;
(Universitas Indonesia, 2015)
|
[Penelitian tesis ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis problematika hukumpengaturan penyelesaian sengketa dan perselisihan hasil pemilihan umum olehkekuasaan kehakiman di Indonesia dan kemudian merumuskan ulang formulapengaturan yang berbasis electoral justice system. Hasil Penelitian inimenunjukkan bahwa problematika hukum dimaksud diantaranya berkaitan denganmiskonsepsi tentang sengketa Pemilu dan perselisihan hasil Pemilu, desaininstitusional bawaslu, hukum acara baik untuk penyelesaian sengketa Pemilumaupun untuk perselisihan hasil Pemilu yang tidak kompatibel dengankarakteristik Pemilu, dan ambiguitas tafsir mengenai kewenangan MahkamahKonstitusi dalam penyelesaian perselisihan hasil Pemilu. Problematika tersebutdalam beberapa kasus telah melahirkan dualisme putusan pengadilan yang salingbertentangan, sehingga mendistorsi prinsip negara hukum yang diamanatkan olehkonstitusi. Oleh karena itu, pengaturan penyelesaian sengketa dan perselisihanhasil pemilihan umum oleh kekuasaan kehakiman di Indonesia perludireformulasi berbasis pada prinsip-prinsip electoral justice system agar lebihmemberikan kepastian hukum bagi penyelenggaraan Pemilu di Indonesia.;The research aims to analyze the problems regarding the regulation ofelectoral dispute and election result dispute settlement by judicial power inIndonesia. The research also aims to reformulate the regulation of electoraldispute and election result dispute settlement by judicial power in Indonesia basedon electoral justice system principles. This study found that the problems areabout the misconception concerning electoral dispute and election result dispute,institutional design of Bawaslu, the procedural law for the settlement of electoraldisputes as well as for the election result dispute are not compatible with thecharacteristics of the election, and the ambiguity of constitutional court’sinterpretation regarding its authority in the election result dispute settlement.These problems in some cases led to the duality of conflicting court rulings, thusdistorting the rule of law as mandated by the constitution. Therefore, theregulation of electoral dispute and election result dispute settlement by judicialpower in Indonesia needs to be reformulated based on electoral justice systemprinciples in order to embody legal certainty in the election process in Indonesia;The research aims to analyze the problems regarding the regulation ofelectoral dispute and election result dispute settlement by judicial power inIndonesia. The research also aims to reformulate the regulation of electoraldispute and election result dispute settlement by judicial power in Indonesia basedon electoral justice system principles. This study found that the problems areabout the misconception concerning electoral dispute and election result dispute,institutional design of Bawaslu, the procedural law for the settlement of electoraldisputes as well as for the election result dispute are not compatible with thecharacteristics of the election, and the ambiguity of constitutional court’sinterpretation regarding its authority in the election result dispute settlement.These problems in some cases led to the duality of conflicting court rulings, thusdistorting the rule of law as mandated by the constitution. Therefore, theregulation of electoral dispute and election result dispute settlement by judicialpower in Indonesia needs to be reformulated based on electoral justice systemprinciples in order to embody legal certainty in the election process in Indonesia, The research aims to analyze the problems regarding the regulation ofelectoral dispute and election result dispute settlement by judicial power inIndonesia. The research also aims to reformulate the regulation of electoraldispute and election result dispute settlement by judicial power in Indonesia basedon electoral justice system principles. This study found that the problems areabout the misconception concerning electoral dispute and election result dispute,institutional design of Bawaslu, the procedural law for the settlement of electoraldisputes as well as for the election result dispute are not compatible with thecharacteristics of the election, and the ambiguity of constitutional court’sinterpretation regarding its authority in the election result dispute settlement.These problems in some cases led to the duality of conflicting court rulings, thusdistorting the rule of law as mandated by the constitution. Therefore, theregulation of electoral dispute and election result dispute settlement by judicialpower in Indonesia needs to be reformulated based on electoral justice systemprinciples in order to embody legal certainty in the election process in Indonesia] |
T44744-Muhammad Imam Nasef.pdf :: Unduh
|
No. Panggil : | T44744 |
Entri utama-Nama orang : | |
Entri tambahan-Nama badan : | |
Subjek : | |
Penerbitan : | [Place of publication not identified]: Universitas Indonesia, 2015 |
Program Studi : |
Bahasa : | ind |
Sumber Pengatalogan : | |
Tipe Konten : | text |
Tipe Media : | unmediated ; computer |
Tipe Carrier : | volume ; online resource |
Deskripsi Fisik : | xiv, 339 pages : illustration ; 28 cm + appendix |
Naskah Ringkas : | |
Lembaga Pemilik : | Universitas Indonesia |
Lokasi : | Perpustakaan UI, Lantai 3 |
No. Panggil | No. Barkod | Ketersediaan |
---|---|---|
T44744 | TERSEDIA |
Ulasan: |
Tidak ada ulasan pada koleksi ini: 20414751 |