[ABSTRAK
Berat lahir merupakan indikator penting perkiraan maturitas dan kemampuanneonatus untuk bisa bertahan, bayi dengan BBLR meningkatkan resiko kematian.Prevalensi BBLR RSU Kabupaten Tangerang mengalami peningkatan secarasignifikan setiap tahunya, tahun 2013 mencapai 14%. Penelitian ini bertujuanuntuk mengetahui Hubungan Kualitas Layanan Antenatal, Status Gizi DanPengetahuan Dengan Kelahiran BBLR Di RSU Tangerang Tahun 2015 Desainpenelitian yang digunakan kasus kontrol dengan jumlah sampel 73 kasus dan 156kontrol. Kualitas Layanan Antenatal kurang, meningkatkan kelahiran BBLR 3.7kali (p=0.02, CI=1,3?10.6) serta kualitas layanan cukup sebesar 2.0 kali (p=0.17,CI= 0.7?5.3) dibandingkan dengan ibu yang mendapatkan kualitas layanan baik.Status gizi 4.6 kali (p=0.01,CI= 2.7 - 11.1) dibandingkan ibu dengan status gizibaik, setelah dikontrol oleh usia ibu, komplikasi kehamilan, status ekonomi, statusanemia, pekerjaan dan riwayat BBLR. Dengan demikian petugas dimintamemotivasi ibu untuk melakukan kunjungan minimal 4 kali selama kehamilannyadan memberikan pelayanan standar minimal ?10T?, mampu mendeteksi kelainantumbuh kembang janin, dengan cara skrining dan manajemen tatalaksana kasuspada ibu dengan status gizi kurang.
ABSTRACT
Brith weight is an important indicator to estimate maturity and ability of neonatalto survive. Low brith weight increases the risk of death. Prevalence of LBW inRSU Tangerang has Increased significantly each year, in 2013 reach 14%. Thisstudi examine risk LBW by quality of prenatal care and nutritional status in RSUTangerang in 2015. This is a case-control study with a sample of 73 cases and 156controls. Women with less prenatal care quality, increasing the LBW baby 3.7times (p=0.02, CI=1,3?10.6) and twice among women with enoght prenatal carequality (p=0.17, CI= 0.7?5.3), compare to women who get good prenatal carequality. The nutritional status 4.6 times (p=0.01,CI= 2.7 - 11.1) compare womenwho have good nutritional status, after controlled by maternal age, complicationsof pregnancy, economic status, anemia status, jobs, and history of LBW. Thus,health workers need to motivate a mother to visit at least 4 times duringpregnancy and provide a minimum standard care ?10T?, able to detectabnormalities in fetal development by screening and management cases in womenwith poor nutritional status;Brith weight is an important indicator to estimate maturity and ability of neonatalto survive. Low brith weight increases the risk of death. Prevalence of LBW inRSU Tangerang has Increased significantly each year, in 2013 reach 14%. Thisstudi examine risk LBW by quality of prenatal care and nutritional status in RSUTangerang in 2015. This is a case-control study with a sample of 73 cases and 156controls. Women with less prenatal care quality, increasing the LBW baby 3.7times (p=0.02, CI=1,3?10.6) and twice among women with enoght prenatal carequality (p=0.17, CI= 0.7?5.3), compare to women who get good prenatal carequality. The nutritional status 4.6 times (p=0.01,CI= 2.7 - 11.1) compare womenwho have good nutritional status, after controlled by maternal age, complicationsof pregnancy, economic status, anemia status, jobs, and history of LBW. Thus,health workers need to motivate a mother to visit at least 4 times duringpregnancy and provide a minimum standard care ?10T?, able to detectabnormalities in fetal development by screening and management cases in womenwith poor nutritional status, Brith weight is an important indicator to estimate maturity and ability of neonatalto survive. Low brith weight increases the risk of death. Prevalence of LBW inRSU Tangerang has Increased significantly each year, in 2013 reach 14%. Thisstudi examine risk LBW by quality of prenatal care and nutritional status in RSUTangerang in 2015. This is a case-control study with a sample of 73 cases and 156controls. Women with less prenatal care quality, increasing the LBW baby 3.7times (p=0.02, CI=1,3â10.6) and twice among women with enoght prenatal carequality (p=0.17, CI= 0.7â5.3), compare to women who get good prenatal carequality. The nutritional status 4.6 times (p=0.01,CI= 2.7 - 11.1) compare womenwho have good nutritional status, after controlled by maternal age, complicationsof pregnancy, economic status, anemia status, jobs, and history of LBW. Thus,health workers need to motivate a mother to visit at least 4 times duringpregnancy and provide a minimum standard care â10Tâ, able to detectabnormalities in fetal development by screening and management cases in womenwith poor nutritional status] |
T-Restu Octasila.pdf :: Unduh