[ABSTRAK Tesis ini membahas pengaruh kuasa wacana terhadap pilihan bebas tokoh Sasanadalam proses pembentukan eksistensi diri. Dengan menggunakan teori kuasawacana Foucault, analisis menunjukkan bahwa kehidupan Sasana tidak pernahlepas dari kuasa wacana yang mengonstruksi pemikiran dan tindakannya. Iamendefinisikan diri berhadapan dengan wacana yang mengharuskannya membuatpilihan dalam menentukan jalan hidupnya. Dengan menggunakan teorieksistensialisme Sartre, analisis menunjukkan bahwa dalam proses pendefinisiantersebut, ia memperjuangkan pilihan bebasnya dengan cara bernegosiasi denganwacana. Ia dapat memilih untuk patuh terhadap kekuasaan tersebut atau tidakpatuh dan melakukan hal yang berlawanan dengan wacana kuasa. KesadaranSasana sendiri yang memutuskan untuk memberikan atau tidak memberikanotoritas kepada wacana untuk menguasai dirinya, karena proses pendefinisian dirisepenuhnya adalah keputusan dari pilihan bebas Sasana. Hasil analisismenunjukkan bahwa kuasa wacana yang terrepresentasikan dalam pandanganorang lain memberi pengaruh dalam pembentukan eksistensi diri Sasana ketika iatidak setia pada pilihan bebasnya dan menolak untuk bertanggungjawab ataspilihan tersebut. Sebaliknya, Sasana terbebas dari pengaruh wacana ketika ia setiapada eksistensi diri yang telah ditetapkannya dan bertanggungjawab terhadapsegala konsekuensi dari pilihan bebas tersebut. ABSTRACT This Thesis analysis the influence of discourse toward the free will of Sasana inconstructing self Existence process. By using Foucault?s theory of the power ofdiscourse, the analysis shows that Sasana?s life is never liberated from the powerof discourse that constructing his way of think and his way of act. He defineshimself toward the discourse that requires him to make choice in determining hisway. By using Sartre?s theory of existentialism, the analysis shows that in thatprocess, he struggle for his free will in the manner of negotiating with thediscourse. He can chooses to be obedient to the power or not and does the thingthat is opposite with the discourse. It is Sasana?s consciousness which eventuallydecides to give or not to give the discourse an authority to take control of himself,because the total self-defining process is the decision of such free will. It can beconcluded that the power of discourse which is represented by the look of otherinfluences Sasana?s way of constructing his self existence, when he is not faithfulto his free will and refuses to be responsible for it. On the contrary, Sasana is freedfrom the discourse?s influence when he is faithful to his determined self existenceand responsible for all consequences from those free will.;This Thesis analysis the influence of discourse toward the free will of Sasana inconstructing self Existence process. By using Foucault?s theory of the power ofdiscourse, the analysis shows that Sasana?s life is never liberated from the powerof discourse that constructing his way of think and his way of act. He defineshimself toward the discourse that requires him to make choice in determining hisway. By using Sartre?s theory of existentialism, the analysis shows that in thatprocess, he struggle for his free will in the manner of negotiating with thediscourse. He can chooses to be obedient to the power or not and does the thingthat is opposite with the discourse. It is Sasana?s consciousness which eventuallydecides to give or not to give the discourse an authority to take control of himself,because the total self-defining process is the decision of such free will. It can beconcluded that the power of discourse which is represented by the look of otherinfluences Sasana?s way of constructing his self existence, when he is not faithfulto his free will and refuses to be responsible for it. On the contrary, Sasana is freedfrom the discourse?s influence when he is faithful to his determined self existenceand responsible for all consequences from those free will.;This Thesis analysis the influence of discourse toward the free will of Sasana inconstructing self Existence process. By using Foucault?s theory of the power ofdiscourse, the analysis shows that Sasana?s life is never liberated from the powerof discourse that constructing his way of think and his way of act. He defineshimself toward the discourse that requires him to make choice in determining hisway. By using Sartre?s theory of existentialism, the analysis shows that in thatprocess, he struggle for his free will in the manner of negotiating with thediscourse. He can chooses to be obedient to the power or not and does the thingthat is opposite with the discourse. It is Sasana?s consciousness which eventuallydecides to give or not to give the discourse an authority to take control of himself,because the total self-defining process is the decision of such free will. It can beconcluded that the power of discourse which is represented by the look of otherinfluences Sasana?s way of constructing his self existence, when he is not faithfulto his free will and refuses to be responsible for it. On the contrary, Sasana is freedfrom the discourse?s influence when he is faithful to his determined self existenceand responsible for all consequences from those free will., This Thesis analysis the influence of discourse toward the free will of Sasana inconstructing self Existence process. By using Foucault’s theory of the power ofdiscourse, the analysis shows that Sasana’s life is never liberated from the powerof discourse that constructing his way of think and his way of act. He defineshimself toward the discourse that requires him to make choice in determining hisway. By using Sartre’s theory of existentialism, the analysis shows that in thatprocess, he struggle for his free will in the manner of negotiating with thediscourse. He can chooses to be obedient to the power or not and does the thingthat is opposite with the discourse. It is Sasana’s consciousness which eventuallydecides to give or not to give the discourse an authority to take control of himself,because the total self-defining process is the decision of such free will. It can beconcluded that the power of discourse which is represented by the look of otherinfluences Sasana’s way of constructing his self existence, when he is not faithfulto his free will and refuses to be responsible for it. On the contrary, Sasana is freedfrom the discourse’s influence when he is faithful to his determined self existenceand responsible for all consequences from those free will.] |