[ABSTRAK Latar Belakang : Inkontinensia urin sampai saat ini masih menjadi masalah bagimasyarakat dunia. Telah ada tiga penelitian yang membandingkan penurunanleher kandung kemih pada kelompok inkontinensia urin jenis stres dankontinensia. Namun penelitian mengenai perbandingan tersebut belum ada diIndonesia sementara hasil penelitian yang telah ada belum dapat digeneralisirpada populasi di Indonesia. Berdasarkan hal tersebut peneliti ingin mengetahuiapakah terdapat perbedaan rerata penurunan leher kandung kemih kelompokinkontinensia urin jenis stres dan kontinensia di Indonesia dengan perbedaan padatiga buah aspek, yaitu aspek penegakan diagnosis, kelompok pembanding, danpengukuran.Tujuan : Menganalisis perbedaan rerata mobilitas leher kandung kemih padainkontinensia urin jenis stres dan kontinensia.Metode : Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian observasional. Untuk menjawabpertanyaan penelitian utama dan tambahan digunakan desain deskriptif potonglintang. Populasi target dalam penelitian ini adalah semua perempuan yangmengalami inkontinensia urin jenis stres dan kontinensia di Indonesia. Populasiterjangkau penelitian ini adalah semua perempuan yang mengalami inkontinensiaurin jenis stres dan kontinensia masing-masing 37 orang yang berobat ke UnitRawat Jalan Poliklinik Ginekologi RSCM periode Februari 2014 sampai Januari2015.Hasil : Rerata jarak leher kandung kemih ke simfisis pubis saat istirahat, saatvalsava dan mobilitas leher kandung kemih pada inkontinensia urin jenis stresberturut-turut adalah 26,9 ( SB 3,2) mm, 5 ( -29 - 22) mm dan 24,3 (SB 7,9) mm.Rerata jarak leher kandung kemih ke simfisis pubis saat istirahat, saat valsava danmobilitas leher kandung kemih pada kontinensia berturut-turut adalah 26,9 (SB3,2) mm, 17,6 (SB 5,3) mm dan 10 (SD 4,1) mm. Rerata jarak leher kandungkemih ke simfisis pubis saat valsava pada inkontinensia urin jenis stres lebih kecildibandingkan kontinensia 6,3 (SB 7,1) mm VS 16,3 (SB 5,2) mm, p=0,0001.Rerata mobilitas leher kandung kemih pada inkontinensia urin jenis stres lebihbesar dibandingkan kontinensia 20,8 ( SB 7,0) mm VS 10,0 (SD 4,8) mm,p=0,0001.Kesimpulan : Rerata jarak leher kandung kemih ke simfisis pubis saat valsavapada inkontinensia urin jenis stres lebih kecil dibandingkan kontinensia. Reratamobilitas leher kandung kemih pada inkontinensia urin jenis stres lebih besardibandingkan kontinensia. ABSTRACT Background : Stress urinary incontinence still be the world problem. Variousstudies compared decreasing bladder neck on stress urinary incontinence andcontinence have been done. Research with the same purpose has not been done inIndonesia. Based on that, need to study how the comparison decreasing ofbladder neck between stress urinary incontinence and continence groups inIndonesia with a difference in three aspects, such as diagnostic criteria,comparised group, and the observer.Aim : To analize difference bladder neck mobility on stress urinry incontinenceand continence.Methods : This study was an observational study. Main and additional researchquestions using a cross-sectional design . The target population in this study wereall women who undergo stress urinary incontinence and continence in Indonesia .The population of this study was affordable to all women who undergo stressurinary incontinence and continence were treated to the Outpatient Clinic ofGynecology Unit of Ciptomangunkusumo Hospital in the period Februari 2014 toJanuary 2015.Results : Mean of distance of bladder neck to the symphysis pubic at rest, valsavaand bladder neck mobility on stress urinary incontinence were 26,9 (SD 3,2) mm,5 (-29 - 22) mm and 24,3 (SD 7,9) mm. Mean of distance of bladder neck to thesymphysis pubic at rest, at valsalva and bladder neck mobility on continence were26,9 (SD 3,2) mm, 17,6 (SD 5,3) mm and 10,0 (SD 4,1) mm. There was nodifferences between the distance of bladder neck to the symphysis pubic at rest onstress urinary incontinence and continence 27,1 (SD 3,3) mm VS 26,3 (SD 3,5)mm, p=0,523. Mean of distance of bladder neck to the symphysis pubic atvalsava on stress urinary incontinenc was lower than continence 6,3 (SD 7,1) mmVS 16,3 (SD 5,2) mm, p=0,0001. Mean of bladder neck mobility on stress urinaryincontinence was greater than continence 20,8 ( SD 7,0) mm VS 10,0 (SD 4,8)mm, p=0,0001.Conclusion : Mean of distance of the bladder neck to the symphysis pubic atvalsava on stress urinary incontinenc was lower than continence. Mean ofbladder neck mobility on stress urinary incontinence was greater than continence, Background : Stress urinary incontinence still be the world problem. Variousstudies compared decreasing bladder neck on stress urinary incontinence andcontinence have been done. Research with the same purpose has not been done inIndonesia. Based on that, need to study how the comparison decreasing ofbladder neck between stress urinary incontinence and continence groups inIndonesia with a difference in three aspects, such as diagnostic criteria,comparised group, and the observer.Aim : To analize difference bladder neck mobility on stress urinry incontinenceand continence.Methods : This study was an observational study. Main and additional researchquestions using a cross-sectional design . The target population in this study wereall women who undergo stress urinary incontinence and continence in Indonesia .The population of this study was affordable to all women who undergo stressurinary incontinence and continence were treated to the Outpatient Clinic ofGynecology Unit of Ciptomangunkusumo Hospital in the period Februari 2014 toJanuary 2015.Results : Mean of distance of bladder neck to the symphysis pubic at rest, valsavaand bladder neck mobility on stress urinary incontinence were 26,9 (SD 3,2) mm,5 (-29 - 22) mm and 24,3 (SD 7,9) mm. Mean of distance of bladder neck to thesymphysis pubic at rest, at valsalva and bladder neck mobility on continence were26,9 (SD 3,2) mm, 17,6 (SD 5,3) mm and 10,0 (SD 4,1) mm. There was nodifferences between the distance of bladder neck to the symphysis pubic at rest onstress urinary incontinence and continence 27,1 (SD 3,3) mm VS 26,3 (SD 3,5)mm, p=0,523. Mean of distance of bladder neck to the symphysis pubic atvalsava on stress urinary incontinenc was lower than continence 6,3 (SD 7,1) mmVS 16,3 (SD 5,2) mm, p=0,0001. Mean of bladder neck mobility on stress urinaryincontinence was greater than continence 20,8 ( SD 7,0) mm VS 10,0 (SD 4,8)mm, p=0,0001.Conclusion : Mean of distance of the bladder neck to the symphysis pubic atvalsava on stress urinary incontinenc was lower than continence. Mean ofbladder neck mobility on stress urinary incontinence was greater than continence] |