[ABSTRAK
Latar Belakang : Risiko infeksi Helicobacter pylori (H.pylori) dikaitkan denganbanyak faktor yang terkait dengan pejamu-agen-lingkungan. Etnis adalah salahsatu faktor dari pejamu yang banyak diteliti di luar negeri. Prevalensi infeksiH.pylori didapatkan lebih tinggi pada etnis tertentu seperti misalnya di China.Berdasarkan teori Migrasi dan teori Transmisi diduga infeksi H.pylori akandibawa oleh penduduk yang bermigrasi dari daerah dengan prevalensi tinggi ketempat tujuan migrasi. Etnis Tionghoa di Kalimantan Barat berasal dari daerahChina Selatan dimana prevalensi infeksi H.pylori tinggi. Diperkirakan adaperbedaan angka prevalensi infeksi H.pylori pada etnis Tionghoa dibandingkanpada etnis asli Kalimantan Barat, yaitu etnis Dayak.Tujuan : Untuk mengetahui perbedaan angka prevalensi, karakteristikepidemiologis dan gambaran hasil pemeriksaan endoskopi pada subjek etnisTionghoa dan Dayak dengan sindrom dispepsia.Metode : Penelitian ini adalah studi potong lintang untuk mengetahui perbedaanangka prevalensi infeksi H.pylori. Penelitian dilakukan di RSU Santo AntoniusPontianak dari bulan Desember 2014 sampai Juni 2015 dengan metodepengambilan sampel secara consecutive sampling. Angka prevalensi infeksiH.pylori disajikan dalam angka persentase, sedangkan perbedaan karakteristikepidemiologis dan perbedaan gambaran hasil pemeriksaan endoskopi pada etnisTionghoa dan Dayak dianalisis dengan analisis bivariat menggunakan chi-squaredengan tingkat kemaknaan (p) = 0,05.Hasil : Dari 203 subjek yang diteliti, terdiri dari 102 subjek etnis Tionghoa dan101 subjek etnis Dayak didapatkan angka prevalensi H.pylori sebesar 40,8%.Prevalensi pada etnis Tionghoa didapatkan lebih tinggi dibanding etnis Dayak,berturut-turut sebesar 48,0% dan 33,7%. Tidak ada perbedaan karakteristikepidemiologis dan temuan hasil pemeriksaan endoskopi pada kedua kelompoketnis.Simpulan : Terdapat perbedaan angka prevalensi infeksi H.pylori pada etnisTionghoa (48,0%) dibanding etnis Dayak (33,7%). Tidak ada perbedaankarakteristik epidemiologis dan gambaran hasil pemeriksaan endoskopi padakedua kelompok etnis.
ABSTRACT
Background : Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection risk is associated withmany factors related to host-agent-environment matter. Ethnicity is one of the hostfactors which was the most studied factor overseas. The prevalence of H. pyloriinfection was found higher in certain ethnic such among Chinese. Based onmigration and transmission theory, it was suspected that H. pylori infection weretransmitted by people migrating from areas with a high prevalence of infection tothe destination area. Chinese in West Borneo are originated from South Chinaregion where the prevalence of H. pylori infection is high. It is estimated thatthere are differences in the prevalence of H. pylori infection among Chinesecompared to the native people of West Borneo, the Dayaknese.Objective: To determine the differences in the prevalence, epidemiologicalcharacteristics and endoscopic finding between Chinese and Dayaknese withdyspeptic syndrome.Methods: This study was a cross-sectional study to determine the differences inthe prevalence of H. pylori infection. The study was conducted at St. AntoniusGeneral Hospital Pontianak from December 2014 to June 2015 with consecutivesampling method. H.pylori infection prevalence is presented in percentagenumbers, while the epidemiological characteristics and endoscopic findingdifferences among Chinese and Dayaknese were analyzed by bivariate analysisusing the chi-square with significance value (p) = 0.05.Results : From a total of 203 subjects in this study, consisted of 102 Chinesesubjects and 101 Dayaknese subjects, the prevalence of H.pylori infection was40.8%. The prevalence among Chinese is higher than Dayaknese, which is 48.0%and 33.7%, respectively. There is no difference in the epidemiologicalcharacteristics and endoscopic findings in both ethnic groups.Conclusions : The prevalence of H. pylori infection among the Chinese (48.0%)is higher than among Dayaknese (33.7%). There is no difference in theepidemiological characteristics and endoscopic finding among both ethnic groups.;Background : Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection risk is associated withmany factors related to host-agent-environment matter. Ethnicity is one of the hostfactors which was the most studied factor overseas. The prevalence of H. pyloriinfection was found higher in certain ethnic such among Chinese. Based onmigration and transmission theory, it was suspected that H. pylori infection weretransmitted by people migrating from areas with a high prevalence of infection tothe destination area. Chinese in West Borneo are originated from South Chinaregion where the prevalence of H. pylori infection is high. It is estimated thatthere are differences in the prevalence of H. pylori infection among Chinesecompared to the native people of West Borneo, the Dayaknese.Objective: To determine the differences in the prevalence, epidemiologicalcharacteristics and endoscopic finding between Chinese and Dayaknese withdyspeptic syndrome.Methods: This study was a cross-sectional study to determine the differences inthe prevalence of H. pylori infection. The study was conducted at St. AntoniusGeneral Hospital Pontianak from December 2014 to June 2015 with consecutivesampling method. H.pylori infection prevalence is presented in percentagenumbers, while the epidemiological characteristics and endoscopic findingdifferences among Chinese and Dayaknese were analyzed by bivariate analysisusing the chi-square with significance value (p) = 0.05.Results : From a total of 203 subjects in this study, consisted of 102 Chinesesubjects and 101 Dayaknese subjects, the prevalence of H.pylori infection was40.8%. The prevalence among Chinese is higher than Dayaknese, which is 48.0%and 33.7%, respectively. There is no difference in the epidemiologicalcharacteristics and endoscopic findings in both ethnic groups.Conclusions : The prevalence of H. pylori infection among the Chinese (48.0%)is higher than among Dayaknese (33.7%). There is no difference in theepidemiological characteristics and endoscopic finding among both ethnic groups.;Background : Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection risk is associated withmany factors related to host-agent-environment matter. Ethnicity is one of the hostfactors which was the most studied factor overseas. The prevalence of H. pyloriinfection was found higher in certain ethnic such among Chinese. Based onmigration and transmission theory, it was suspected that H. pylori infection weretransmitted by people migrating from areas with a high prevalence of infection tothe destination area. Chinese in West Borneo are originated from South Chinaregion where the prevalence of H. pylori infection is high. It is estimated thatthere are differences in the prevalence of H. pylori infection among Chinesecompared to the native people of West Borneo, the Dayaknese.Objective: To determine the differences in the prevalence, epidemiologicalcharacteristics and endoscopic finding between Chinese and Dayaknese withdyspeptic syndrome.Methods: This study was a cross-sectional study to determine the differences inthe prevalence of H. pylori infection. The study was conducted at St. AntoniusGeneral Hospital Pontianak from December 2014 to June 2015 with consecutivesampling method. H.pylori infection prevalence is presented in percentagenumbers, while the epidemiological characteristics and endoscopic findingdifferences among Chinese and Dayaknese were analyzed by bivariate analysisusing the chi-square with significance value (p) = 0.05.Results : From a total of 203 subjects in this study, consisted of 102 Chinesesubjects and 101 Dayaknese subjects, the prevalence of H.pylori infection was40.8%. The prevalence among Chinese is higher than Dayaknese, which is 48.0%and 33.7%, respectively. There is no difference in the epidemiologicalcharacteristics and endoscopic findings in both ethnic groups.Conclusions : The prevalence of H. pylori infection among the Chinese (48.0%)is higher than among Dayaknese (33.7%). There is no difference in theepidemiological characteristics and endoscopic finding among both ethnic groups., Background : Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection risk is associated withmany factors related to host-agent-environment matter. Ethnicity is one of the hostfactors which was the most studied factor overseas. The prevalence of H. pyloriinfection was found higher in certain ethnic such among Chinese. Based onmigration and transmission theory, it was suspected that H. pylori infection weretransmitted by people migrating from areas with a high prevalence of infection tothe destination area. Chinese in West Borneo are originated from South Chinaregion where the prevalence of H. pylori infection is high. It is estimated thatthere are differences in the prevalence of H. pylori infection among Chinesecompared to the native people of West Borneo, the Dayaknese.Objective: To determine the differences in the prevalence, epidemiologicalcharacteristics and endoscopic finding between Chinese and Dayaknese withdyspeptic syndrome.Methods: This study was a cross-sectional study to determine the differences inthe prevalence of H. pylori infection. The study was conducted at St. AntoniusGeneral Hospital Pontianak from December 2014 to June 2015 with consecutivesampling method. H.pylori infection prevalence is presented in percentagenumbers, while the epidemiological characteristics and endoscopic findingdifferences among Chinese and Dayaknese were analyzed by bivariate analysisusing the chi-square with significance value (p) = 0.05.Results : From a total of 203 subjects in this study, consisted of 102 Chinesesubjects and 101 Dayaknese subjects, the prevalence of H.pylori infection was40.8%. The prevalence among Chinese is higher than Dayaknese, which is 48.0%and 33.7%, respectively. There is no difference in the epidemiologicalcharacteristics and endoscopic findings in both ethnic groups.Conclusions : The prevalence of H. pylori infection among the Chinese (48.0%)is higher than among Dayaknese (33.7%). There is no difference in theepidemiological characteristics and endoscopic finding among both ethnic groups.] |
T-Willy Brodus Uwan.pdf :: Unduh