|
[Latar belakang. Infeksi terkait perawatan di rumah sakit, dalam hal ini InfeksiAliran Darah (IAD), merupakan masalah serius yang masih sering di jumpai.Salah satu pengendalian infeksi terkait aliran darah, seperti tehnik antiseptik untukprosedur invasif dan perawatan pada konektor memerlukan antiseptik. Pemilihanjenis antiseptik pada perawatan konektor telah banyak diketahui, penelitian inimembandingkan jenis antiseptik yang dipergunakan pada konektor infus.Tujuan. Mengetahui perbedaan efektifitas CHG 2% IPA (AC swab) dan alkohol70% (BD alcohol swab) pada konektor dalam menurunkan jumlah kolonisasibakteri .Metoda. Penelitian cross sectional pada bayi yang dirawat juni 2015 sampai juli2015 di Rumah Sakit Cipto Mangunkusumo unit Neonatal Jakarta. Subyek dipilihsecara simple random sampling.Hasil. Dari 60 subyek didapatkan 30 CHG 2% IPA dan 30 alkohol 70%,dilakukan scrub konektor pada kedua kelompok didapatkan hasil persentasepenurunan jumlah kolonisasi bakteri yang berbeda bermakna (t test, p = 0,038),uji kolonisasi bakteri sesudah 20 detik scrub antiseptik antara kedua kelompokantiseptik dengan p-value= 0,49 (uji Fisher?s Exact) serta uji kolonisasi bakteri 30detik dan 6 Jam setelah scrub antiseptik CHG 2% IPA (t test, p = 0,28) hasilkedua uji teraebut tidak berbeda bermaknaSimpulan. CHG 2% IPA lebih efektif dalam menurunkan jumlah koloni bakteri pada konektor infus dibandingkan dengan alkohol 70%.;Background. Blood stream infection (BSI), is a serious problem that is oftenencountered. One of the BSI control is such as antiseptic techniques for invasiveprocedures and treatments on the connector requires the type of antiseptic.Selection of types of antiseptics in the treatment of connectors have a lot weknow, this study compared the kind of antiseptic used in connector infusion.Objectives. To compare the effectiveness CHG 2 % IPA (AC swab) and 70%alcohol (BD alcohol swab) as antiseptic for reducing the number of bacterial forthe hub.Methods. A cross sectional study from of infants who had hospitalized from Juni2015 until Juli 2015 in Neonatal Unit Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta.Subjects was selected by simple random sampling.Results. There were 60 subjects obtained 30 CHG2 % IPA and 30 alcohol 70 %,after the scrub connectors in both groups showed a percentage decrease in thenumber of bacterial colonization are significantly different (t test, p = 0.038), p=0,49 (Fisher?s Exact test) after scrub 20 second antiseptic for both groups and 30seconds and 6 hours 2 % CHG IPA after antiseptic scrub t test, p = 0.28 both testresults are not significantly different.Conclusions. 2 % CHG IPA is more effective in reducing the number of colonies bacterial compared with 70% alcohol., Background. Blood stream infection (BSI), is a serious problem that is oftenencountered. One of the BSI control is such as antiseptic techniques for invasiveprocedures and treatments on the connector requires the type of antiseptic.Selection of types of antiseptics in the treatment of connectors have a lot weknow, this study compared the kind of antiseptic used in connector infusion.Objectives. To compare the effectiveness CHG 2 % IPA (AC swab) and 70%alcohol (BD alcohol swab) as antiseptic for reducing the number of bacterial forthe hub.Methods. A cross sectional study from of infants who had hospitalized from Juni2015 until Juli 2015 in Neonatal Unit Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta.Subjects was selected by simple random sampling.Results. There were 60 subjects obtained 30 CHG2 % IPA and 30 alcohol 70 %,after the scrub connectors in both groups showed a percentage decrease in thenumber of bacterial colonization are significantly different (t test, p = 0.038), p=0,49 (Fisher’s Exact test) after scrub 20 second antiseptic for both groups and 30seconds and 6 hours 2 % CHG IPA after antiseptic scrub t test, p = 0.28 both testresults are not significantly different.Conclusions. 2 % CHG IPA is more effective in reducing the number of colonies bacterial compared with 70% alcohol.] |
SP-Rosalina Paulina Manalu.pdf :: Unduh