Perbandingan kinerja struktur sistem transfer prategang dan struktur konvensional dengan menggunakan analisa pushover = Performance comparison between prestress transfer system structure and regular structure using pushover analysis / Wisnu Pratama Putra
Wisnu Pratama Putra;
Yuskar Lase, supervisor; Sjahril A. Rahim, supervisor; Heru Purnomo, examiner; Henki Wibowo Ashadi, examiner; Mulia Orientilize, examiner
([Publisher not identified]
, 2013)
|
|
[ABSTRAK Semakin bertambahnya kebutuhan ruang vertikal di kota besar seperti Jakartamembuat para ahli membangun banyak bangunan bertingkat. Meski demikian,rencana ini tidak selalu efektif oleh karena keberadaan bangunan purbakala(heritage) yang harus dilestarikan. Oleh karena itu, bangunan baru harus dibangunmenggunakan sistem transfer yang dalam penelitian ini berupa kombinasi antarabalok transfer prategang parsial dan kolom-kolom pendukung. Analisa pushoverakan dilakukan untuk bangunan ini sehingga kinerja bangunan pada fase inelatisdapat diketahui. Hasil bangunan sistem transfer akan dibandingkan dengan hasilanalisa pushover pada bangunan regular untuk mengetahui pengaruh keberadaansistem transfer terhadap kinerja inelastik struktur. Sebelum dilakukan analisapushover, bangunan didesain secara dinamik linear dengan mengacu padaperaturan SNI 03-1726-2012 dan SNI 03-2847-2002. Hasil perbandinganmenunjukkan pertambahan degree of prestressing akan memperkecil daktilitasdan kemampuan disipasi energi bangunan. Rasio pengurangan kemampuandisipasi energi bervariasi antara 15% - 23%. Kinerja terendah seluruh bangunanpada saat target perpindahan ialah Life Safety, yang mana merupakan level kinerjaBasic Safety Objectives berdasarkan FEMA 356. Dari sini dapat ditarikkesimpulan bahwa peraturan yang digunakan dalam desain mampu menghasilkanbangunan dengan performa cukup baik. ABSTRACT The increasing need of vertical room in Jakarta made experts build a lot of multistoriesbuildings. Nonetheless, this plan is not always effective because of thepresence of heritage building which must be preserved. Consequently, newbuilding must be built using a transfer system which in this research is acombination between partially prestressed transfer beam and supporting columnsbelow the beam. To determine the inelastic performance of the building, pushoveranalysis will be applied. The pushover analysis result for transfer system buildinglater will be compared with the result for regular building to understand the effectof transfer system to structure?s inelastic performance. Prior to applying pushoveranalysis, both buildings are designed based on SNI 03-1726-2012 and SNI 03-2847-2002 codes. The comparison shows the degree of prestressing accretion willreduce the ductility and energy dissipation capacity of the building. The reductionof energy dissipation capacity ratio varies between 15% - 23%. The lowestperformance of both buildings at target displacement is Life Safety, which is theBasic Safety Objectives performance based on FEMA 356. From this, it can beconcluded that the codes used in designing the building is able to producebuilding with quite good performance., The increasing need of vertical room in Jakarta made experts build a lot of multistoriesbuildings. Nonetheless, this plan is not always effective because of thepresence of heritage building which must be preserved. Consequently, newbuilding must be built using a transfer system which in this research is acombination between partially prestressed transfer beam and supporting columnsbelow the beam. To determine the inelastic performance of the building, pushoveranalysis will be applied. The pushover analysis result for transfer system buildinglater will be compared with the result for regular building to understand the effectof transfer system to structure’s inelastic performance. Prior to applying pushoveranalysis, both buildings are designed based on SNI 03-1726-2012 and SNI 03-2847-2002 codes. The comparison shows the degree of prestressing accretion willreduce the ductility and energy dissipation capacity of the building. The reductionof energy dissipation capacity ratio varies between 15% - 23%. The lowestperformance of both buildings at target displacement is Life Safety, which is theBasic Safety Objectives performance based on FEMA 356. From this, it can beconcluded that the codes used in designing the building is able to producebuilding with quite good performance.] |
 T43537-Wisnu Pratama Putra.pdf :: Unduh
|
| No. Panggil : | T43537 |
| Entri utama-Nama orang : | |
| Entri tambahan-Nama orang : | |
| Entri tambahan-Nama badan : | |
| Subjek : | |
| Penerbitan : | [Place of publication not identified]: [Publisher not identified], 2013 |
| Program Studi : |
| Bahasa : | ind |
| Sumber Pengatalogan : | LibUI ind rda |
| Tipe Konten : | text |
| Tipe Media : | unmediated ; computer |
| Tipe Carrier : | volume ; online resource |
| Deskripsi Fisik : | xxi, 270 pages : illustration ; 28 cm + appendix |
| Naskah Ringkas : | |
| Lembaga Pemilik : | Universitas Indonesia |
| Lokasi : | Perpustakaan UI, Lantai 3 |
| No. Panggil | No. Barkod | Ketersediaan |
|---|---|---|
| T43537 | 15-17-089949543 | TERSEDIA |
| Ulasan: |
| Tidak ada ulasan pada koleksi ini: 20417638 |
