[ABSTRAK
Gadai saham sebagai salah satu bentuk jaminan pada dasarnya berfungsiuntuk menjamin terwujudnya pemenuhan kewajiban debitur kepada kreditur,sehingga gadai saham akan timbul dan berakhir seiring dengan timbul danberakhirnya perjanjian utang piutang yang merupakan perjanjian pokoknya. Halini sesuai dengan sifat dari jaminan gadai yaitu bersifat accesoir. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata tidak mengatur secara khusus mengenai akibat hukumdari sifat accesoir jaminan gadai. Hal inilah yang kemudian menyebabkanterjadinya permasalahan dengan timbulnya perbedaan interpretasi berkaitandengan sifat accesoir dari jaminan gadai dimana, sebagian pihak berpendapatsebagai perjanjian tambahan, klausula perjanjian gadai saham tidak diperbolehkanmengatur jangka waktu pengakhiran gadai saham sebelum utang lunas.Sedangkan sebagian pihak lainnya beranggapan sepanjang disepakati kedua belahpihak, perjanjian gadai saham bebas memuat klausula pengakhiran gadai sahammengingat adanya asas kebebasan berkontrak. Berdasarkan putusan MA Nomor:240 PK/PDT/2006 memberikan kemungkinan untuk mengatur klausulapengakhiran gadai saham sebelum utang lunas dan pengaturan mengenaikeabsahan eksekusi gadai saham yang dilaksanakan setelah berakhirnya perjanjiangadai saham. Metode penulisan yang digunakan adalah ekplanatoris denganpendekatan yuridis normatif. Data yang digunakan adalah sumber data sekunderberupa studi dokumen. Tesis ini akan berusaha untuk membahas dan menganalisasecara terperinci mengenai sifat accesoir dari perjanjian gadai saham besertaakibatnya dan keabsahan eksekusi gadai saham yang dilaksanakan setelahperjanjian gadai saham berakhir menurut ketentuan peraturan perundanganundanganyang berlaku.
ABSTRACT
Pledge of shares as a form of security principally used to ensure thefulfillment of debtor?s obligation to creditor, therefore pledge of shares shall beeffective and terminate at the same time with the loan agreement as the principalagreement. This is in accordance with the characteristic of pledge which isaccesoir. The Indonesian Civil Code does not explicitly stipulate the legalconsequences of the accesoir characteristic of pledge. This fact has causeddifferent interpretations of the legal requirements of the accesoir characteristic ofpledge, some parties are in the opinion that as an additional agreements, the articleof pledge of shares agreement are not allowed to set the time of termination ofpledge of shares before the debt is paid off. Meanwhile the other parties thoughtthat, as long as the contract was agreed by both parties, the pledge of sharesagreement is allow containing an article of termination before the debt is paid offaccording the principle freedom of contract. According to the decision of theSupreme Court Number: 240 PK/PDT/2006 give the possibility to adjust thearticle of pledge of shares agreement about the termination before the debt is paidoff and the legality procedure of the execution after the pledge of sharesagreement has expired. Research methodology used is explanatory with normativejuridical approach. Used data is secondary data with the form of documents study.Used data is secondary data with the form of documents study. This thesis willattempt to discuss and analyze the detail about the accesoir characteristic ofpledge of shares with its consequences and the legality of the execution after thepledge of shares agreement expired under the provisions of the prevailing law andregulations., Pledge of shares as a form of security principally used to ensure thefulfillment of debtor’s obligation to creditor, therefore pledge of shares shall beeffective and terminate at the same time with the loan agreement as the principalagreement. This is in accordance with the characteristic of pledge which isaccesoir. The Indonesian Civil Code does not explicitly stipulate the legalconsequences of the accesoir characteristic of pledge. This fact has causeddifferent interpretations of the legal requirements of the accesoir characteristic ofpledge, some parties are in the opinion that as an additional agreements, the articleof pledge of shares agreement are not allowed to set the time of termination ofpledge of shares before the debt is paid off. Meanwhile the other parties thoughtthat, as long as the contract was agreed by both parties, the pledge of sharesagreement is allow containing an article of termination before the debt is paid offaccording the principle freedom of contract. According to the decision of theSupreme Court Number: 240 PK/PDT/2006 give the possibility to adjust thearticle of pledge of shares agreement about the termination before the debt is paidoff and the legality procedure of the execution after the pledge of sharesagreement has expired. Research methodology used is explanatory with normativejuridical approach. Used data is secondary data with the form of documents study.Used data is secondary data with the form of documents study. This thesis willattempt to discuss and analyze the detail about the accesoir characteristic ofpledge of shares with its consequences and the legality of the execution after thepledge of shares agreement expired under the provisions of the prevailing law andregulations.] |
T44107-Suaini.pdf :: Unduh