Abstract
[Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk melihat pengaruh variasi elemen dan melihat perbedaan pengaruh variasi elemen electronic word-of-mouth positif berupa teks dan gambar-teks terhadap sikap merek pada mengguna bus TransJakarta. Tipe penelitian ini adalah field experiment dengan desain randomized between-subject design (pretest & posttest). Terdapat dua kelompok eksperimen yaitu kelompok variasi elemen teks dan gambar-teks. Partisipan (n = 89) adalah pengguna bus TransJakarta yang memiliki aplikasi LINE. Penelitian dilakukan dengan memberikan 28 electronic word-of-mouth positif selama 7 hari melalui grup LINE. Alat ukur sikap merek sudah diadaptasi dari Wu dan Wang (2011). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa variasi elemen electronic word-of-mouth positif secara signifikan mempengaruhi sikap merek pada pengguna bus TransJakarta dengan nilai (t(88) = 2.930, p < 0.05). selain itu, variasi elemen electronic wordof- mouth tidak berbeda secara signifikan berpengaruh terhadap sikap merek pada pengguna bus TransJakarta dengan nilai (t(87) = 1.679, p > 0.05). ...... The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of positive electronic wordof- mouth element variation that are text and text-with-picture towards TransJakarta bus users? brand attitude. This study was field experiment study with randomized between-subject design (pretest & posttest). The participants (n=89) of this study were a TransJakarta user that used TransJakarta at least four days in a week. Researcher divided the participants into two experiment groups, text-only positive electronic word-of-mouth and text-with-picture positive electronic wordof- mouth. The research was done by giving 28 electronic word-of-mouths for 7 days. The brand attitude was measured by using Wu and Wang (2011) brand attitude scale. The findings showed that electronic word-of-mouth element variation affects TransJakarta users? brand attitude (t(88) = 2.930, p < 0.05). The other findings suggest that there was no significant differences of the effects of electronic word-of-mouth on TransJakarta users? brand attitude (t(87) = 1.679, p > 0.05).;The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of positive electronic wordof- mouth element variation that are text and text-with-picture towards TransJakarta bus users? brand attitude. This study was field experiment study with randomized between-subject design (pretest & posttest). The participants (n=89) of this study were a TransJakarta user that used TransJakarta at least four days in a week. Researcher divided the participants into two experiment groups, text-only positive electronic word-of-mouth and text-with-picture positive electronic wordof- mouth. The research was done by giving 28 electronic word-of-mouths for 7 days. The brand attitude was measured by using Wu and Wang (2011) brand attitude scale. The findings showed that electronic word-of-mouth element variation affects TransJakarta users? brand attitude (t(88) = 2.930, p < 0.05). The other findings suggest that there was no significant differences of the effects of electronic word-of-mouth on TransJakarta users? brand attitude (t(87) = 1.679, p > 0.05).;The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of positive electronic wordof- mouth element variation that are text and text-with-picture towards TransJakarta bus users? brand attitude. This study was field experiment study with randomized between-subject design (pretest & posttest). The participants (n=89) of this study were a TransJakarta user that used TransJakarta at least four days in a week. Researcher divided the participants into two experiment groups, text-only positive electronic word-of-mouth and text-with-picture positive electronic wordof- mouth. The research was done by giving 28 electronic word-of-mouths for 7 days. The brand attitude was measured by using Wu and Wang (2011) brand attitude scale. The findings showed that electronic word-of-mouth element variation affects TransJakarta users? brand attitude (t(88) = 2.930, p < 0.05). The other findings suggest that there was no significant differences of the effects of electronic word-of-mouth on TransJakarta users? brand attitude (t(87) = 1.679, p > 0.05).;The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of positive electronic wordof- mouth element variation that are text and text-with-picture towards TransJakarta bus users? brand attitude. This study was field experiment study with randomized between-subject design (pretest & posttest). The participants (n=89) of this study were a TransJakarta user that used TransJakarta at least four days in a week. Researcher divided the participants into two experiment groups, text-only positive electronic word-of-mouth and text-with-picture positive electronic wordof- mouth. The research was done by giving 28 electronic word-of-mouths for 7 days. The brand attitude was measured by using Wu and Wang (2011) brand attitude scale. The findings showed that electronic word-of-mouth element variation affects TransJakarta users? brand attitude (t(88) = 2.930, p < 0.05). The other findings suggest that there was no significant differences of the effects of electronic word-of-mouth on TransJakarta users? brand attitude (t(87) = 1.679, p > 0.05)., The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of positive electronic wordof-
mouth element variation that are text and text-with-picture towards
TransJakarta bus users? brand attitude. This study was field experiment study with
randomized between-subject design (pretest & posttest). The participants (n=89)
of this study were a TransJakarta user that used TransJakarta at least four days in a
week. Researcher divided the participants into two experiment groups, text-only
positive electronic word-of-mouth and text-with-picture positive electronic wordof-
mouth. The research was done by giving 28 electronic word-of-mouths for 7
days. The brand attitude was measured by using Wu and Wang (2011) brand
attitude scale. The findings showed that electronic word-of-mouth element
variation affects TransJakarta users? brand attitude (t(88) = 2.930, p < 0.05). The
other findings suggest that there was no significant differences of the effects of
electronic word-of-mouth on TransJakarta users? brand attitude (t(87) = 1.679, p >
0.05).]
