Full Description

Cataloguing Source LibUI ind rda
Content Type text (rdacontent)
Media Type unmediated (rdamedia); computer (rdamedia)
Carrier Type volume (rdacarrier); online resource (rdacarrier)
Physical Description 135 pages : illustration ; 29 cm.
Concise Text
Holding Institution Universitas Indonesia
Location Perpustakaan UI, Lantai 3
 
  •  Availability
  •  Digital Files: 1
  •  Review
  •  Cover
  •  Abstract
Call Number Barcode Number Availability
S61869 14-17-877223237 TERSEDIA
No review available for this collection: 20421899
 Abstract
[ ABSTRAK
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji pengaruh kepemilikan keluarga terhadap keputusan perusahaan non finansial dalam melakukan merger dan akuisisi. Penelitian ini juga menguji pengaruh kepemilikan keluarga terhadap cumulative abnormal return, ketika perusahaan memutuskan untuk melakukan merger dan akuisisi. Regresi logistik untuk 249 perusahaan dalam 6 tahun penelitian menemukan bahwa perusahaan dengan kepemilikan keluarga secara signifikan lebih pasif dalam melakukan kegiatan merger dan akuisisi. Secara umum, seiring pertambahan persentase kepemilikan keluarga, efek entrenchment semakin menguat. Walaupun begitu, pengaruh persentase kepemilikan dalam berbagai rentang ditemukan berbeda, dikarenakan ada hubungan non linear antara konsentrasi kepemilikan dengan keputusan merger dan akuisisi. Regresi OLS menemukan bahwa walaupun sentimen pasar akan kegiatan merger dan akuisisi secara umum positif, namun efeknya melemah seiring dengan pertambahan persentase kepemilikan dalam perusahaan bidder keluarga.
ABSTRACT This research aims to examine the impact of family ownership to merger and acquisition decision. This research also aims to examine the difference of family ownership in terms of market sentiment using proxy stock cumulative abnormal return following merger and acquisition. Logistic regression for 249 firms in 6 years discovers that family firms are significantly more passive towards merger and acquisition decision, and this entrenchment effect is reinforced as the family percentage increases. However, it is found that there is non linear relationship between family percentage and its likelihood to merge and acquire. OLS regression finds that even when merger and acquisition decision generally create positive value on abnormal return, this effect is weakened as family ownership percentage increases in bidder firm.;This research aims to examine the impact of family ownership to merger and acquisition decision. This research also aims to examine the difference of family ownership in terms of market sentiment using proxy stock cumulative abnormal return following merger and acquisition. Logistic regression for 249 firms in 6 years discovers that family firms are significantly more passive towards merger and acquisition decision, and this entrenchment effect is reinforced as the family percentage increases. However, it is found that there is non linear relationship between family percentage and its likelihood to merge and acquire. OLS regression finds that even when merger and acquisition decision generally create positive value on abnormal return, this effect is weakened as family ownership percentage increases in bidder firm.;This research aims to examine the impact of family ownership to merger and acquisition decision. This research also aims to examine the difference of family ownership in terms of market sentiment using proxy stock cumulative abnormal return following merger and acquisition. Logistic regression for 249 firms in 6 years discovers that family firms are significantly more passive towards merger and acquisition decision, and this entrenchment effect is reinforced as the family percentage increases. However, it is found that there is non linear relationship between family percentage and its likelihood to merge and acquire. OLS regression finds that even when merger and acquisition decision generally create positive value on abnormal return, this effect is weakened as family ownership percentage increases in bidder firm.;This research aims to examine the impact of family ownership to merger and acquisition decision. This research also aims to examine the difference of family ownership in terms of market sentiment using proxy stock cumulative abnormal return following merger and acquisition. Logistic regression for 249 firms in 6 years discovers that family firms are significantly more passive towards merger and acquisition decision, and this entrenchment effect is reinforced as the family percentage increases. However, it is found that there is non linear relationship between family percentage and its likelihood to merge and acquire. OLS regression finds that even when merger and acquisition decision generally create positive value on abnormal return, this effect is weakened as family ownership percentage increases in bidder firm., This research aims to examine the impact of family ownership to merger and acquisition decision. This research also aims to examine the difference of family ownership in terms of market sentiment using proxy stock cumulative abnormal return following merger and acquisition. Logistic regression for 249 firms in 6 years discovers that family firms are significantly more passive towards merger and acquisition decision, and this entrenchment effect is reinforced as the family percentage increases. However, it is found that there is non linear relationship between family percentage and its likelihood to merge and acquire. OLS regression finds that even when merger and acquisition decision generally create positive value on abnormal return, this effect is weakened as family ownership percentage increases in bidder firm.]