Efek pengulangan tugas yang disertai balikan terfokus pada akurasi produksi bahasa pelajar : studi kasus pada pelajar EFL Indonesia = The effect of task repetition and focused feedback on students accuracy : a case study of Indonesian EFL learners
Sya`baningrum Prihhartini;
Sisilia Setiawati Halimi, supervisor
([Publisher not identified]
, 2015)
|
[ABSTRAK Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui efek pengulangan tugas dan balikanterfokus terhadap aspek akurasi. Produksi bahasa pelajar yang diteliti meliputi:dua tugas tertulis, satu tugas lisan, dan satu post-test tertulis. Hasil tulisan dantranskripsi tugas lisan dianalisis dan tingkat akurasinya diukur, yang berdasarkanpada rasio penggunaan struktur target yang benar. T-test untuk sampelberpasangan dan ANOVA with Repeated Measure digunakan untuk menentukanapakah terdapat perbedaan rerata yang signifikan. Temuan analisismemperlihatkan pelajar dengan tingkat kemahiran menulis yang rendah sebagaipihak yang berhasil meraih manfaat terbesar, yang terlihat dari perbaikan strukturkalimat serta perolehan jumlah struktur berterima yang dihasilkan. ABSTRACTThis study aimed to investigate the effect of task repetition and focused feedbackon students? accuracy. The students? language output that was investigatedincluded: two writing tasks, one oral task, and one written post-test. Students?writings and transcription of oral task were analyzed and the level of accuracywas measured, which was based on the ratio of the correct use of the targetedstructure. T-test for paired samples and ANOVA with Repeated Measure wereused to see if there were any significant differences between the means. Thefindings found that learners with low writing skills were the ones who gained thebenefits the most, which were shown from the improvement in sentence structureand the number of the target structure produced.;This study aimed to investigate the effect of task repetition and focused feedbackon students? accuracy. The students? language output that was investigatedincluded: two writing tasks, one oral task, and one written post-test. Students?writings and transcription of oral task were analyzed and the level of accuracywas measured, which was based on the ratio of the correct use of the targetedstructure. T-test for paired samples and ANOVA with Repeated Measure wereused to see if there were any significant differences between the means. Thefindings found that learners with low writing skills were the ones who gained thebenefits the most, which were shown from the improvement in sentence structureand the number of the target structure produced.;This study aimed to investigate the effect of task repetition and focused feedbackon students? accuracy. The students? language output that was investigatedincluded: two writing tasks, one oral task, and one written post-test. Students?writings and transcription of oral task were analyzed and the level of accuracywas measured, which was based on the ratio of the correct use of the targetedstructure. T-test for paired samples and ANOVA with Repeated Measure wereused to see if there were any significant differences between the means. Thefindings found that learners with low writing skills were the ones who gained thebenefits the most, which were shown from the improvement in sentence structureand the number of the target structure produced., This study aimed to investigate the effect of task repetition and focused feedbackon students’ accuracy. The students’ language output that was investigatedincluded: two writing tasks, one oral task, and one written post-test. Students’writings and transcription of oral task were analyzed and the level of accuracywas measured, which was based on the ratio of the correct use of the targetedstructure. T-test for paired samples and ANOVA with Repeated Measure wereused to see if there were any significant differences between the means. Thefindings found that learners with low writing skills were the ones who gained thebenefits the most, which were shown from the improvement in sentence structureand the number of the target structure produced.] |
![]()
|
No. Panggil : | T45313 |
Entri utama-Nama orang : | |
Entri tambahan-Nama orang : | |
Entri tambahan-Nama badan : | |
Subjek : | |
Penerbitan : | [Place of publication not identified]: [Publisher not identified], 2015 |
Program Studi : |
Bahasa : | ind |
Sumber Pengatalogan : | LibUI ind rda |
Tipe Konten : | text |
Tipe Media : | unmediated ; computer |
Tipe Carrier : | volume ; online resource |
Deskripsi Fisik : | xvi, 146 pages : illustration ; 30 cm + appendix |
Naskah Ringkas : | |
Lembaga Pemilik : | Universitas Indonesia |
Lokasi : | Perpustakaan UI, Lantai 3 |
No. Panggil | No. Barkod | Ketersediaan |
---|---|---|
T45313 | 15-17-012432905 | TERSEDIA |
Ulasan: |
Tidak ada ulasan pada koleksi ini: 20422711 |