[ABSTRAK
Jakarta adalah kota terbesar di Indonesia. Sebagai kota terbesar di Indonesia, Jakartajuga memiliki populasi yang sangat besar, yang diimbangi oleh majunya ekonomiJakarta. Sebagai imbas populasi dan pertumbuhan ekonomi, permasalahanpengelolaan limbah padat adalah salah satu permasalahan dasar kota Jakarta.Penelitian ini memiliki tujuan untuk menganalisis keberlanjutan pengelolaan limbahpadat di Jakarta dengan mengukur ekoefisiensinya, serta menganalisis keberlanjutanmetode hydrocracking sebagai cara pengolahan limbah padat perkotaan, khususnya diJakarta. Pada sistem pengelolaan terkini, ditemukan bahwa pengelolaan limbah padatdi Jakarta tidak berlanjut (Ekoefisiensi pada tahun 2013, sebesar 0,52 lebih kecil dari1). Oleh sebab itu diperlukan intervensi berupa proses hydrocracking (Ekoefisiensiproses sebesar 1,775) agar pengelolaan limbah padat di Jakarta berlanjut. Skenariointervensi hydrocracking baru akan berlanjut apabila limbah padat di Jakarta telahdipilah sebesar 50% dan limbah padat organik diproses melalui hydrocrackingsebesar 30%.
ABSTRACTJakarta is the biggest city in Indonesia. As such, it is densely populated, and has amajor economic activity. These two factors contribute towards the current solid wastemanagement issues in Jakarta. This paper aims to analyze the sustainability ofexisting municipal solid waste by measuring its ecoefficiency, and to analyze thesustainability of hydrocracking method as a means of municipal solid wastetreatment. In the existing condition, We find that Jakarta?s municipal solid wastemanagement system is not sustainable (In 2013, the ecoefficiency was measured at0,52 which is less than 1). Therefore, based on this finding we find it to be necessaryto do an intervention. In this paper, the intervention was introduced in the form ofhydrocracking process. As a process we find hydrocracking to be a sustainableprocess (ecoefficiency of the process is measured at 1,775). However, theintervention scenario will only be sustainable, once 50% of the solid waste of sorted,and if hydrocracking method treats 30% of this fraction;Jakarta is the biggest city in Indonesia. As such, it is densely populated, and has amajor economic activity. These two factors contribute towards the current solid wastemanagement issues in Jakarta. This paper aims to analyze the sustainability ofexisting municipal solid waste by measuring its ecoefficiency, and to analyze thesustainability of hydrocracking method as a means of municipal solid wastetreatment. In the existing condition, We find that Jakarta?s municipal solid wastemanagement system is not sustainable (In 2013, the ecoefficiency was measured at0,52 which is less than 1). Therefore, based on this finding we find it to be necessaryto do an intervention. In this paper, the intervention was introduced in the form ofhydrocracking process. As a process we find hydrocracking to be a sustainableprocess (ecoefficiency of the process is measured at 1,775). However, theintervention scenario will only be sustainable, once 50% of the solid waste of sorted,and if hydrocracking method treats 30% of this fraction, Jakarta is the biggest city in Indonesia. As such, it is densely populated, and has amajor economic activity. These two factors contribute towards the current solid wastemanagement issues in Jakarta. This paper aims to analyze the sustainability ofexisting municipal solid waste by measuring its ecoefficiency, and to analyze thesustainability of hydrocracking method as a means of municipal solid wastetreatment. In the existing condition, We find that Jakarta’s municipal solid wastemanagement system is not sustainable (In 2013, the ecoefficiency was measured at0,52 which is less than 1). Therefore, based on this finding we find it to be necessaryto do an intervention. In this paper, the intervention was introduced in the form ofhydrocracking process. As a process we find hydrocracking to be a sustainableprocess (ecoefficiency of the process is measured at 1,775). However, theintervention scenario will only be sustainable, once 50% of the solid waste of sorted,and if hydrocracking method treats 30% of this fraction] |
T-Dimas Hokka Pratama Soebekti.pdf :: Unduh