ABSTRAK
Latar Belakang: Kematian pada Penyakit Jantung Koroner (PJK) terutama akibat tindakan revaskularisasi yang tertunda atau lesi koroner kompleks yang biasanyalebih buruk pada populasi pasien PGK. Skor Modified ACEF merupakan sebuahperangkat yang memiliki peran penting dalam prognosis mortalitas PJK. SkormACEF belum pernah digunakan untuk mengevaluasi kompleksitas lesi koroner.Informasi tersebut berguna dalam menentukan prioritas tindakan angiografikoroner. Tujuan: Mendapatkan nilai diagnostik dan titik potong skor mACEF sebagaiprediktor kompleksitas lesi koroner pada pasien PGK stadium 3 dan 4 yangmengalami sindrom koroner akut (SKA). Metode: Penelitian ini merupakan uji diagnostik secara retrospektif terhadap 179subjek PGK stadium 3 dan 4 yang mengalami SKA yang dirawat di ICCU RSCMtahun 2012 hingga 2014. Analisis titik potong skor mACEF dilakukan denganmenggunakan Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves dengan intervalkepercayaan (IK) sebesar 95%. Akurasi diagnostik skor mACEF dinilai dengancara menghitung sensitivitas, spesifisitas, RKP, dan RKN. Hasil: Titik potong skor mACEF yang optimal adalah 2,288 dengan sensitivitas90,9%, spesifisitas 63,7%, RKP 2,5, RKN 0,14 dan prevalens 55,3%. Kesimpulan: Titik potong yang optimal skor mACEF pada populasi pasien PGKstadium 3 dan 4 yang mengalami SKA adalah 2,288. Akurasi diagnostik skor mACEF dinilai baik.ABSTRACT
Background: Cardiovascular disease is one of the main causes of death mainlydue to delayed revascularization or complex coronary lesions which are usuallyworse in CKD patients. Modified ACEF (mACEF) score is well established indetermining cardiovascular mortality of patients undergoing revascularizationtherapy and has never been used to evaluate the complexity of coronary lesionsbefore. mACEF score?s potential as a diagnostic tool needs to be evaluated to helpstratify patients eligible for coronary angiography. Aim: To evaluate mACEF score?s diagnostic value and cut-off point as apredictor of coronary lesion complexity in patients with CKD stages 3 and 4 withACS. Methods: This study is a diagnostic test conducted retrospectively involving 179subjects with CKD stages 3 and 4 with ACS admitted to ICCU RSCM from 2012to 2014. Cut-off analysis was performed using ROC curve with confidenceintervals (CI) of 95% and diagnostic accuracy of mACEF was analyzed togenerate sensitivity, specificity, LR+, and LR-. Result: The optimal cut-off point for mACEF score was 2,288 with sensitivity of90,9%, specificity 63,7%, LR+ 2,5, LR- 0,14, and prevalence of 55,3%. Conclusion: mACEF score has a good diagnostic accuracy in subjects with CKD stage 3 and 4 with ACS with optimal cut-off point of 2,288, respectively.;Background: Cardiovascular disease is one of the main causes of death mainlydue to delayed revascularization or complex coronary lesions which are usuallyworse in CKD patients. Modified ACEF (mACEF) score is well established indetermining cardiovascular mortality of patients undergoing revascularizationtherapy and has never been used to evaluate the complexity of coronary lesionsbefore. mACEF score?s potential as a diagnostic tool needs to be evaluated to helpstratify patients eligible for coronary angiography. Aim: To evaluate mACEF score?s diagnostic value and cut-off point as apredictor of coronary lesion complexity in patients with CKD stages 3 and 4 withACS. Methods: This study is a diagnostic test conducted retrospectively involving 179subjects with CKD stages 3 and 4 with ACS admitted to ICCU RSCM from 2012to 2014. Cut-off analysis was performed using ROC curve with confidenceintervals (CI) of 95% and diagnostic accuracy of mACEF was analyzed togenerate sensitivity, specificity, LR+, and LR-. Result: The optimal cut-off point for mACEF score was 2,288 with sensitivity of90,9%, specificity 63,7%, LR+ 2,5, LR- 0,14, and prevalence of 55,3%. Conclusion: mACEF score has a good diagnostic accuracy in subjects with CKD stage 3 and 4 with ACS with optimal cut-off point of 2,288, respectively.;Background: Cardiovascular disease is one of the main causes of death mainlydue to delayed revascularization or complex coronary lesions which are usuallyworse in CKD patients. Modified ACEF (mACEF) score is well established indetermining cardiovascular mortality of patients undergoing revascularizationtherapy and has never been used to evaluate the complexity of coronary lesionsbefore. mACEF score?s potential as a diagnostic tool needs to be evaluated to helpstratify patients eligible for coronary angiography. Aim: To evaluate mACEF score?s diagnostic value and cut-off point as apredictor of coronary lesion complexity in patients with CKD stages 3 and 4 withACS. Methods: This study is a diagnostic test conducted retrospectively involving 179subjects with CKD stages 3 and 4 with ACS admitted to ICCU RSCM from 2012to 2014. Cut-off analysis was performed using ROC curve with confidenceintervals (CI) of 95% and diagnostic accuracy of mACEF was analyzed togenerate sensitivity, specificity, LR+, and LR-. Result: The optimal cut-off point for mACEF score was 2,288 with sensitivity of90,9%, specificity 63,7%, LR+ 2,5, LR- 0,14, and prevalence of 55,3%. Conclusion: mACEF score has a good diagnostic accuracy in subjects with CKD stage 3 and 4 with ACS with optimal cut-off point of 2,288, respectively.;Background: Cardiovascular disease is one of the main causes of death mainlydue to delayed revascularization or complex coronary lesions which are usuallyworse in CKD patients. Modified ACEF (mACEF) score is well established indetermining cardiovascular mortality of patients undergoing revascularizationtherapy and has never been used to evaluate the complexity of coronary lesionsbefore. mACEF score?s potential as a diagnostic tool needs to be evaluated to helpstratify patients eligible for coronary angiography. Aim: To evaluate mACEF score?s diagnostic value and cut-off point as apredictor of coronary lesion complexity in patients with CKD stages 3 and 4 withACS. Methods: This study is a diagnostic test conducted retrospectively involving 179subjects with CKD stages 3 and 4 with ACS admitted to ICCU RSCM from 2012to 2014. Cut-off analysis was performed using ROC curve with confidenceintervals (CI) of 95% and diagnostic accuracy of mACEF was analyzed togenerate sensitivity, specificity, LR+, and LR-. Result: The optimal cut-off point for mACEF score was 2,288 with sensitivity of90,9%, specificity 63,7%, LR+ 2,5, LR- 0,14, and prevalence of 55,3%. Conclusion: mACEF score has a good diagnostic accuracy in subjects with CKD stage 3 and 4 with ACS with optimal cut-off point of 2,288, respectively. |
SP-Bhanu.pdf :: Unduh