Full Description
| Record of Work | Spesialis |
| Cataloguing Source | LibUI ind rda |
| Content Type | text (rdacontent) |
| Media Type | computer (rdamedia) |
| Carrier Type | online resource (rdamedia) |
| Physical Description | xii, 34 pages : illustration + appendix |
| Concise Text | |
| Holding Institution | Universitas Indonesia |
| Location | Perpustakaan UI, Lantai 3 |
- Availability
- Digital Files: 1
- Review
- Cover
- Abstract
| Call Number | Barcode Number | Availability |
|---|---|---|
| SP-PDF | 16-18-545495259 | TERSEDIA |
| No review available for this collection: 20424660 |
Abstract
ABSTRAK
Latar Belakang: Preparasi saluran akar oval memiliki tantangan tersendiri karena bentuknya yang ireguler sehingga file tidak dapat berkontak dengan seluruh dinding. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membandingkan luas dinding saluran akar oval yang tidak terpreparasi dengan gerakan sirkumferensial filing. Metode: Tiga puluh dua gigi premolar mandibula diisi tinta cina kemudian dipreparasi menjadi dua kelompok: Mtwo® dan ProTaper Next®. Luas sisa tinta cina dianalisis dengan Adobe Photoshop CS6 dan ImageJ. Hasil: Tidak terdapat perbedaan bermakna antara kedua kelompok, namun ProTaper Next® meninggalkan area lebih sedikit dibandingkan Mtwo®. Kesimpulan: Mtwo® dan ProTaper Next® tetap meninggalkan area yang tidak terpreparasi pada saluran akar oval.ABSTRACT
Background: Mechanical preparation of oval root canal has its own challenge due to the irregular shape leaving some area uninstrumented. This study compared uninstrumented area of oval root canal with circumferential filing using two different files. Methods: Thirty-two mandibular premolars were dyed with china ink and divided into two groups, Mtwo® and ProTaper Next®. The uninstrumented areas were analized using Adobe Photoshop CS6 and ImageJ. Results: There were no significant difference between two files, thou ProTaper Next® left less uninstrumented areas than Mtwo®. Conclusion: Mtwo® and ProTaper Next® left uninstrumented areas in oval root canal.;Background: Mechanical preparation of oval root canal has its own challenge due to the irregular shape leaving some area uninstrumented. This study compared uninstrumented area of oval root canal with circumferential filing using two different files. Methods: Thirty-two mandibular premolars were dyed with china ink and divided into two groups, Mtwo® and ProTaper Next®. The uninstrumented areas were analized using Adobe Photoshop CS6 and ImageJ. Results: There were no significant difference between two files, thou ProTaper Next® left less uninstrumented areas than Mtwo®. Conclusion: Mtwo® and ProTaper Next® left uninstrumented areas in oval root canal.;Background: Mechanical preparation of oval root canal has its own challenge due to the irregular shape leaving some area uninstrumented. This study compared uninstrumented area of oval root canal with circumferential filing using two different files. Methods: Thirty-two mandibular premolars were dyed with china ink and divided into two groups, Mtwo® and ProTaper Next®. The uninstrumented areas were analized using Adobe Photoshop CS6 and ImageJ. Results: There were no significant difference between two files, thou ProTaper Next® left less uninstrumented areas than Mtwo®. Conclusion: Mtwo® and ProTaper Next® left uninstrumented areas in oval root canal.;Background: Mechanical preparation of oval root canal has its own challenge due to the irregular shape leaving some area uninstrumented. This study compared uninstrumented area of oval root canal with circumferential filing using two different files. Methods: Thirty-two mandibular premolars were dyed with china ink and divided into two groups, Mtwo® and ProTaper Next®. The uninstrumented areas were analized using Adobe Photoshop CS6 and ImageJ. Results: There were no significant difference between two files, thou ProTaper Next® left less uninstrumented areas than Mtwo®. Conclusion: Mtwo® and ProTaper Next® left uninstrumented areas in oval root canal.
Latar Belakang: Preparasi saluran akar oval memiliki tantangan tersendiri karena bentuknya yang ireguler sehingga file tidak dapat berkontak dengan seluruh dinding. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membandingkan luas dinding saluran akar oval yang tidak terpreparasi dengan gerakan sirkumferensial filing. Metode: Tiga puluh dua gigi premolar mandibula diisi tinta cina kemudian dipreparasi menjadi dua kelompok: Mtwo® dan ProTaper Next®. Luas sisa tinta cina dianalisis dengan Adobe Photoshop CS6 dan ImageJ. Hasil: Tidak terdapat perbedaan bermakna antara kedua kelompok, namun ProTaper Next® meninggalkan area lebih sedikit dibandingkan Mtwo®. Kesimpulan: Mtwo® dan ProTaper Next® tetap meninggalkan area yang tidak terpreparasi pada saluran akar oval.ABSTRACT
Background: Mechanical preparation of oval root canal has its own challenge due to the irregular shape leaving some area uninstrumented. This study compared uninstrumented area of oval root canal with circumferential filing using two different files. Methods: Thirty-two mandibular premolars were dyed with china ink and divided into two groups, Mtwo® and ProTaper Next®. The uninstrumented areas were analized using Adobe Photoshop CS6 and ImageJ. Results: There were no significant difference between two files, thou ProTaper Next® left less uninstrumented areas than Mtwo®. Conclusion: Mtwo® and ProTaper Next® left uninstrumented areas in oval root canal.;Background: Mechanical preparation of oval root canal has its own challenge due to the irregular shape leaving some area uninstrumented. This study compared uninstrumented area of oval root canal with circumferential filing using two different files. Methods: Thirty-two mandibular premolars were dyed with china ink and divided into two groups, Mtwo® and ProTaper Next®. The uninstrumented areas were analized using Adobe Photoshop CS6 and ImageJ. Results: There were no significant difference between two files, thou ProTaper Next® left less uninstrumented areas than Mtwo®. Conclusion: Mtwo® and ProTaper Next® left uninstrumented areas in oval root canal.;Background: Mechanical preparation of oval root canal has its own challenge due to the irregular shape leaving some area uninstrumented. This study compared uninstrumented area of oval root canal with circumferential filing using two different files. Methods: Thirty-two mandibular premolars were dyed with china ink and divided into two groups, Mtwo® and ProTaper Next®. The uninstrumented areas were analized using Adobe Photoshop CS6 and ImageJ. Results: There were no significant difference between two files, thou ProTaper Next® left less uninstrumented areas than Mtwo®. Conclusion: Mtwo® and ProTaper Next® left uninstrumented areas in oval root canal.;Background: Mechanical preparation of oval root canal has its own challenge due to the irregular shape leaving some area uninstrumented. This study compared uninstrumented area of oval root canal with circumferential filing using two different files. Methods: Thirty-two mandibular premolars were dyed with china ink and divided into two groups, Mtwo® and ProTaper Next®. The uninstrumented areas were analized using Adobe Photoshop CS6 and ImageJ. Results: There were no significant difference between two files, thou ProTaper Next® left less uninstrumented areas than Mtwo®. Conclusion: Mtwo® and ProTaper Next® left uninstrumented areas in oval root canal.