Full Description
| Cataloguing Source : | |
| ISSN : | 08548498 |
| Magazine/Journal : | Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum |
| Volume : | Vo. 13, No. 2, 2006: Hal. 204-221 |
| Content Type : | text (rdacontent) |
| Media Type : | unmediated (rdamedia) |
| Carrier Type : | volume (rdacarrier) |
| Electronic Access : | |
| Holding Company : | Perpustakaan Universitas Indonesia |
| Location : | Perpustakaan UI, Lantai 4 (R. Koleksi Jurnal) |
- Availability
- Digital Files: 0
- Review
- Cover
- Abstract
| Call Number | Barcode Number | Availability |
|---|---|---|
| 345 JHUII 13:2 (2006) | TERSEDIA |
| No review available for this collection: 20428450 |
Abstract
ATCA restricts its jurisdiction by imposing some doctrines such as minimum contact, forum non-convenience political question, international commity and act of state doctrine. Besides that, it also ignores the international criminal law principles such as presunption of innocence, expeditious trial, equity of arms and the atendance of the suspect in the court. The existence of par im parem in habet imperium principles recognized in international law causes the decision of American Court is meaningless.