Full Description
Cataloguing Source | LibUI ind rda |
Content Type | text (rdacontent) |
Media Type | unmediated (rdacontent); computer (rdadontent) |
Carrier Type | volume (rdacarrier); online resource (rdacarrier) |
Physical Description | xvii, 196 pages : illustration ; 28 cm + appendix |
Concise Text | |
Holding Institution | Universitas Indonesia |
Location | Perpustakaan UI, Lantai 3 |
- Availability
- Digital Files: 1
- Review
- Cover
- Abstract
Call Number | Barcode Number | Availability |
---|---|---|
S64856 | 14-18-476611353 | TERSEDIA |
No review available for this collection: 20431039 |
Abstract
ABSTRAK
Minimnya penerapan konsep fair trial menyebabkan rasa keadilan dan kepastian hukum menjadi berkurang selama proses pra-ajudikasi hingga ajudikasi, terbukti melalui Putusan No. 08/Pid.B/2013/PN-GST dengan memvonis anak dengan hukuman mati. Minimnya penerapan asas fair trial menyebabkan pembuktian usia Terdakwa menjadi tidak diperhatikan sehingga asas admisibilitas dan asas hukum acara lainnya dihilangkan, termasuk asas in dubio pro reo. Hakim menjadi kunci dalam vonis mati terdakwa karena integrasi penyidikan hingga pembuktian yang menjadi akar putusan Majelis Hakim. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif. Berkenaan dengan permasalahan putusan ini, ditemukan suatu proses atas penyidikan dan penuntutan terkait usia terdakwa tanpa identitas resmi.
ABSTRACT
The lack of implementation of the concept of fair trial led to a sense of justice and legal certainty to be reduced during the pre-adjudication until the ajudication, as evidenced by Decision No. 08 / Pid.B / 2013 / PN-GST with children sentenced to the death penalty. The lack of a fair trial application of the principle causes of proof of age defendant be noted that the principle of admissibility and legal principles other events omitted, including in dubio pro reo principle. Judges became a key defendant in a death sentence for the integration of the investigation until evidence at the root of the decision of the judges. This research was conducted by the method of juridical normative. With regard to the issue of this decision, discovered a process on the investigation and prosecution of age-related defendants without official identity.;
Minimnya penerapan konsep fair trial menyebabkan rasa keadilan dan kepastian hukum menjadi berkurang selama proses pra-ajudikasi hingga ajudikasi, terbukti melalui Putusan No. 08/Pid.B/2013/PN-GST dengan memvonis anak dengan hukuman mati. Minimnya penerapan asas fair trial menyebabkan pembuktian usia Terdakwa menjadi tidak diperhatikan sehingga asas admisibilitas dan asas hukum acara lainnya dihilangkan, termasuk asas in dubio pro reo. Hakim menjadi kunci dalam vonis mati terdakwa karena integrasi penyidikan hingga pembuktian yang menjadi akar putusan Majelis Hakim. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif. Berkenaan dengan permasalahan putusan ini, ditemukan suatu proses atas penyidikan dan penuntutan terkait usia terdakwa tanpa identitas resmi.
ABSTRACT
The lack of implementation of the concept of fair trial led to a sense of justice and legal certainty to be reduced during the pre-adjudication until the ajudication, as evidenced by Decision No. 08 / Pid.B / 2013 / PN-GST with children sentenced to the death penalty. The lack of a fair trial application of the principle causes of proof of age defendant be noted that the principle of admissibility and legal principles other events omitted, including in dubio pro reo principle. Judges became a key defendant in a death sentence for the integration of the investigation until evidence at the root of the decision of the judges. This research was conducted by the method of juridical normative. With regard to the issue of this decision, discovered a process on the investigation and prosecution of age-related defendants without official identity.;