Deskripsi Lengkap
| Bahasa : | ind |
| Sumber Pengatalogan : | LibUI ind rda |
| Tipe Konten : | text (rdacontent) |
| Tipe Media : | Unmediated (rdacontent); computer (rdacontent) |
| Tipe Carrier : | volume (rdacarrier); online resource (rdacarrier) |
| Deskripsi Fisik : | xiv, 101 pages : illustration ; 30 cm + appendix |
| Naskah Ringkas : | |
| Lembaga Pemilik : | Universitas Indonesia |
| Lokasi : | Perpustakaan UI, Lantai 3 |
- Ketersediaan
- File Digital: 1
- Ulasan
- Sampul
- Abstrak
| No. Panggil | No. Barkod | Ketersediaan |
|---|---|---|
| S66311 | 14-17-849532984 | TERSEDIA |
| Tidak ada ulasan pada koleksi ini: 20444837 |
Abstrak
Tujuan dari studi empiris ini adalah untuk menguji dan menganalisis struktur tata kelola perusahaan (proporsi komisaris independen, rapat dewan komisaris, struktur kepemilikan, dewan direksi dan rapat komite audit) dalam hubungannya dengan pengungkapan modal intelektual. Sampel dari penelitian empiris ini perusahaan non keuangan dan non pemerintah yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) di 2012-2015. Hasil dari studi empiris yaitu (1) proporsi komisaris independen memiliki dampak yang signifikan dan positif terhadap pengungkapan modal intelektual, (2) rapat dewan komisaris memiliki dampak yang signifikan dan negatif terhadap pengungkapan modal intelektual, (3) struktur kepemilikan tidak berpengaruh terhadap pengungkapan modal intelektual, (4) jumlah dewan direksi memiliki pengaruh signifikan dan negatif terhadap pengungkapan modal intelektual, (5) pertemuan komite audit berpengaruh signifikan dan positif terhadap pengungkapan modal intelektual.
The objective of this empirical study is to examine and to analyze the effect of corporate governance structure (independent commissioner, board of commissioner meetings, ownership structure, board of director, and audit committee meetings) on the relation of intellectual capital disclosure. The sample of this empirical study is the manufacturing company that listed in Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) in 2012-2015. The result of this empirical study are (1) independent commissioner had positive significant influence to intellectual capital disclosure, (2) board of commissioner meetings had negative significant influence to intellectual capital disclosure, (3) ownership structure had not significant influence to intellectual capital disclosure, (4) board of director had negative significant influence to intellectual capital disclosure, (5) audit committee meetings had positive significant influence to intellectual capital disclosure.
The objective of this empirical study is to examine and to analyze the effect of corporate governance structure (independent commissioner, board of commissioner meetings, ownership structure, board of director, and audit committee meetings) on the relation of intellectual capital disclosure. The sample of this empirical study is the manufacturing company that listed in Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) in 2012-2015. The result of this empirical study are (1) independent commissioner had positive significant influence to intellectual capital disclosure, (2) board of commissioner meetings had negative significant influence to intellectual capital disclosure, (3) ownership structure had not significant influence to intellectual capital disclosure, (4) board of director had negative significant influence to intellectual capital disclosure, (5) audit committee meetings had positive significant influence to intellectual capital disclosure.