Korupsi di Indonesia sudah sangat serius dengan rendahnya Indeks PersepsiKorupsi di Indonesia. Studi ini menguji pengaruh tekanan kerja terhadap potensikorupsi pada panitia pengada barang/jasa di Propinsi X. Disain studi ini adalahcross sectional yang meliputi semua panitia pengadaan barang/jasa periodepengadaan tahun 2009-2014. Sampel yang diamati berjumlah 513 individupengada barang/jasa. Pengumpulan data sekunder untuk mendapatkan 2kelompok berpotensi korupsi dan tidak berpotensi korupsi. Untuk mendapatkanmodel yang parsimonious dan robbus digunakan analisis multilevel regresilogistic untuk melihat pengaruh variabel tingkat individu dan tingkat instansiterhadap potensi korupsi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa panitia yangmengalami tekanan kerja di tingkat individu mempunyai probabilitas 2,495 (POR2,495; 95%, 0,901- 6,906). Pada model-0 nilai MORinstansi =33,79 dan padamodel-2 nilai MORinstansi =51,13, meningkat sebesar 51,6%. Interval Odds Ratio(IOR) variabel nilai PBJ memiliki rentang yang sangat lebar 0,006 – 34184melewati angka 1, artinya efek variasi tempat bekerja panitia PBJ sangat besarmempengaruhi potensi korupsi. Prevalensi tekanan kerja terhadap potensikorupsi sangat tinggi yaitu 93,4%. Setelah dikontrol oleh beberapa variabelkonfonder, pada tingkat instansi yaitu nilai PBJ ≥ 5 Milyar signifikanmempengaruhi potensi korupsi. Dari hasil analisis epidemiologi, dapat dilakukanupaya pencegahan potensi korupsi dalam PBJ melalui jaring penyebab denganmetode ANNA (Alur Pengendalian Antikorupsi Pengadaan Barang/Jasa).Generalisasi dapat dilakukan pada populasi yang mempunyai karakteristik yangsama, prevalensi stress kerja yang sama dan jumlah angkatan kerja besar sepertipropinsi X.
Corruption in Indonesia has become a very serious problem as shown by the lowCorruption Perception Index in Indonesia. This study examines the effect ofworking pressure to the potency of corruption among procurement staff inProvince X. This cross sectional study involved all procurement committee inthe year of 2009-2014. About 513 procurement staff were recruited as studysamples. The secondary data was obtained in order to determine whether theproject, which samples were involved, was categorized as potentially havingcorruption or not. In order to acquire both parsimonious and robbust, multilevelreggression logistic analysis was used to analys the effect of each variables at thelevel of individual and agency toward corruption potency. The result shows thatworking pressure in the level of individual has a probability 2,495 times higherhaving potency of corruption (POR 2,495; 95%, 0,901- 6,906). In model-0 valueof MORagency =33,79 and in model-2 value MORagency =51,13, it improvedfor 51,6%. Interval Odds Ratio (IOR) of procurement value variable had verywide span of 0,006 - 34184 passed number 1, this means the effect of variation ofprocurement committee's working place highly affected the potency ofcorruption. The prevalens of working pressure is 93.4%. After controlled bysome of potential confounders, in contextual level (working agency), value ofprocurement more than Rp. 5 billion was significantly associated with potency ofcorruption. From the epidemiological view, potency of corruption can beprevented through ANNA method (Alur Pengendalian Antikorupsi dalamPengadaan Barang & Jasa/ Anti-Corruption Controlling Flow in procurement).The finding is generalized to other population with the similar characteristic,prevalens of working presure and number of employed population as province X |
D2154-Anna Sunita.pdf :: Unduh