Efek moderasi kontrol diri inhibisi dan kualitas personal calon terhadap dua tahap keputusan pemilih dalam jual-beli suara = The Moderating effect of voter s inhibitory self control and the personal quality of the candidate on voter s two stage decision in vote buying
Rizka Halida;
Harry Susianto, promotor; Saiful Mujani, co-promotor; Hamdi Muluk, examiner; Mochamad Enoch Markum, examiner; Bagus Takwin, examiner; Kuskridho Ambardi, co promotor; Alin Halimatussadiah, examiner
(Universitas Indonesia, 2017)
|
|
Disertasi ini menguji dua tahap keputusan pemilih dalam situasi jual-beli suara, dengan kontrol diri inhibisi sebagai moderator antara jumlah uang dengan keputusan atas tawaran uang pada Tahap 1,dan kualitas personal calon sebagai moderator antara keputusan atas tawaran uang dengan keputusan memilih calon pada Tahap 2. Dengan metode population-based survey experimentsebagai studi utama,sebanyak 1.220 partisipan yang representatif terhadap pemilih di Indonesia dikelompokkan secara random ke dalam 4 jumlah tawaran uang: Rp50 ribu vs Rp100 ribu vs Rp150 ribu vs kontrol X 3 kualitas calon: lawan lebih baik dalam integritas vs lawan lebih mampu memimpin vs setara between-group design, dan diukur keputusannya pada Tahap 1 menolak atau menerima uang dan Tahap 2 keputusan memilih calon dengan pertanyaan hipotetikal jual-beli suara, serta skala kontrol diri inhibisi KDI . Hasil analisis binary logistic regression dengan mengontrol variabel demografi menunjukkan bahwa uang tidak secara langsung memengaruhi keputusan memilih calon. Pada Tahap 1, pengaruh jumlah tawaran uang terhadap keputusan untuk menerima menolak uang dimoderatori oleh KDI; individu dengan level KDI yang semakin tinggi cenderung tidak menerima uang, bahkan ketika jumlah uang yang ditawarkan lebih banyak. Pada Tahap 2, keputusan menolak uang pada Tahap 1 secara signifikan menurunkan peluang individu untuk memilih calon yang menawarkan uang. Efek penolakan uang pada Tahap 1 semakin kuat ketika kandidat lawan lebih berkualitas dalam kepemimpinan dan integritas. Partisipan yang menerima uang kemudian mendapat pertanyaan aktivasi norma resiprositas kebebasan untuk menguji efeknya terhadap pilihan, namun pengaruhnya tidak sesuai dengan prediksi. Norma resiprositas kebebasan tidak signifikan menaikkan menurunkan peluang individu untuk memilih calon yang melakukan jual-beli suara. Hasil ini menunjukkan bahwa uang yang telah diterima tidak memengaruhi pemilih untuk memilih calon yang telah memberi mereka uang. This disertation examined how voters rsquo decision making in a two stage vote buying context. Inhibitory self control was included as a moderator between the amount of money offered and the decision over the money offered in Stage 1, and candidate rsquo s personal quality was included as a moderator between the decision over the money offered and vote decision in Stage 2. Data collection was conducted through a population based survey experiment of 1.220 participants which randomly selected from the population of Indonesian voters. Participants were randomly assigned into 4 amount of money offered Rp50k vs Rp100k vs Rp150k vs control X 3 candidate rsquo s personal quality competitor is better on leadership vs integrity vs equal between group design. Participants were then hypothetically asked about her his decision at Stage 1 reject or accept the money and Stage 2 which candidate to vote the vote buyer or the competitor . Participants rsquo inhibitory self control was measured using 5 point Likert type scale. A series of binary logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the amount of money was found significantly affect the decision to accept the money offered in Stage 1. Inhibitory self control was significantly moderated the effect of the amount of money on whether individuals would accept the money. Individuals with higher inhibitory self control were less likely to accept the money, even among those who were offered larger amount of money. The decision to reject moneyin Stage 1 lowered the probability to vote for vote buying candidate in Stage 2, and the effect was stronger in the condition when the competitor has a better quality on leadership or integrity. It was also found that the decision to accept money did not significantly affect voting decision. Additionally, neither activating reciprocity freedom nor reciprocity freedom norm significantly affected participants to vote for the vote buying competitor candidate. |
 D2275-Rizka Halida.pdf :: Unduh
|
| No. Panggil : | D2275 |
| Entri utama-Nama orang : | |
| Entri tambahan-Nama orang : | |
| Entri tambahan-Nama badan : | |
| Subjek : | |
| Penerbitan : | Depok: Universitas Indonesia, 2017 |
| Program Studi : |
| Bahasa : | ind |
| Sumber Pengatalogan : | LibUI ind rda |
| Tipe Konten : | text |
| Tipe Media : | unmediated ; computer |
| Tipe Carrier : | volume ; online resource |
| Deskripsi Fisik : | xvii, 143 pages : illustration ; 28 cm + appendix |
| Naskah Ringkas : | |
| Lembaga Pemilik : | Universitas Indonesia |
| Lokasi : | Perpustakaan UI, Lantai 3 |
| No. Panggil | No. Barkod | Ketersediaan |
|---|---|---|
| D2275 | 07-19-978441269 | TERSEDIA |
| Ulasan: |
| Tidak ada ulasan pada koleksi ini: 20454009 |
