Abstract
Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif. Data dikumpulkan melalui wawancara mendalam terhadap key informant.Penelitian ini menghasilkan tiga hasil penelitian. Pertama, terdapat beberapa kelemahan pada CFC rules Indonesia antara lain terbatasnya definisi kontrol, tidak adanya definisi low tax juridiction, tidak terdapat ketentuan penghitungan besar dividen. Kedua, terdapat beberapa perbedaan ketentuan CFC Indonesia dengan Tiongkok antara lain tentang definisi kontrol, definisi low tax juridiction, pengecualian penerapan CFC rules. Ketiga, terdapat beberapa rekomendasi OECD yang dapat dilakukan pertimbangan adopsi antara lain perluasan definisi kontrol, pembuatan ketentuan tentang low tax juridiction dan penghitungan atribusi CFC berdasarkan persentase dan periode kepemilikan.
......
This research uses qualitative approach. Data were collected through in depth interviews of key informants. This study yields three research results. First, there are some weaknesses in CFC rules of Indonesia such as limited definition of control, there is no definition of low tax juridiction, there is no provision of large dividend calculation. Secondly, there are some differences between CFC rules in Indonesia and Tiongkok such as definition of control, definition of low tax juridiction, exemption of CFC rules implementation. Third, there are some OECD recommendations that can be taken into consideration of adoption such as the expansion of the definition of control, the preparation of low tax juridiction and the calculation of CFC attribution based on the percentage and period of ownership.
