Full Description
| Cataloguing Source : | LibUI eng rda |
| ISSN : | 20850433 |
| Magazine/Journal : | Challenges to Democracy at The Local: Journal of Power, Conflict and Democracy in South & Southeast Asia |
| Volume : | Vol. 5, No. 2, 2017: Hal. 211-239 |
| Content Type : | text (rdacontent) |
| Media Type : | unmediated (rdamedia) |
| Carrier Type : | volume (rdacarrier) |
| Electronic Access : | |
| Holding Company : | Universitas Indonesia |
| Location : | Perpustakaan UI, Lantai 4, R. Koleksi Jurnal |
- Availability
- Digital Files: 0
- Review
- Cover
- Abstract
| Call Number | Barcode Number | Availability |
|---|---|---|
| PCD 5: 2 (2017) | 03-18-752609458 | TERSEDIA |
| No review available for this collection: 20479754 |
Abstract
ABSTRACT
As norms and mechanisms, democracy has been set in place and the democratic political system is in operation, while the practical standardfor expressing democracy is tightened, to make monolithic global governance. Those whofail to comply with the standards are subject to a kind of punishment. At this end, democracy becomes undemocratic, as opportunity to propose alternative ways of expressing commitment to democracy is hindered by the specificity of the prevailing regime. In response to this inclination, contextualized expression of democracy is inevitable. Context does matter, as important as the democratic values. The fact that unanticipated iSsues of democratzSation keep emerging, signals the importance of reconciling theprevailing global regime with the particularities in matching local and national contexts. Yet, the contextualised expression is vulnerable to local and national subversions by the predominating power Democratisation, then becomes a detailed craftsmanship nurtured by a testable commitment to democracy, in so far the country is endowed with commitment to the ethics of democracy. By using the case of Indonesia still ongoing democratisation this article maps out the challenges in meeting the standard with the particularity. The analysis in this article provides insights in fostering the contextualized democracy movement in the Asia Pacific Region.
As norms and mechanisms, democracy has been set in place and the democratic political system is in operation, while the practical standardfor expressing democracy is tightened, to make monolithic global governance. Those whofail to comply with the standards are subject to a kind of punishment. At this end, democracy becomes undemocratic, as opportunity to propose alternative ways of expressing commitment to democracy is hindered by the specificity of the prevailing regime. In response to this inclination, contextualized expression of democracy is inevitable. Context does matter, as important as the democratic values. The fact that unanticipated iSsues of democratzSation keep emerging, signals the importance of reconciling theprevailing global regime with the particularities in matching local and national contexts. Yet, the contextualised expression is vulnerable to local and national subversions by the predominating power Democratisation, then becomes a detailed craftsmanship nurtured by a testable commitment to democracy, in so far the country is endowed with commitment to the ethics of democracy. By using the case of Indonesia still ongoing democratisation this article maps out the challenges in meeting the standard with the particularity. The analysis in this article provides insights in fostering the contextualized democracy movement in the Asia Pacific Region.