Full Description
Cataloguing Source | Lib ind rda |
Content Type | text (rdacontent) |
Media Type | computer (rdamedia) |
Carrier Type | online resource (rdacarries) |
Physical Description | xi, 96 pages ; appendix |
Concise Text | |
Holding Institution | Universitas Indonesia |
Location | Perpustakaan UI |
- Availability
- Digital Files: 1
- Review
- Cover
- Abstract
Call Number | Barcode Number | Availability |
---|---|---|
S-pdf | 14-22-72802424 | TERSEDIA |
No review available for this collection: 20501651 |
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penerapan police powers doctrine dalam putusan-putusan ICSID. Konsep police powers doctrine berhubungan erat dengan konsep ekspropriasi tidak langsung. Berdasarkan police powers doctrine, tindakan negara yang tergolong dalam lingkup police powers doctrine dan yang menyebabkan kerugian kepada investor, adalah tidak termasuk sebagai ekspropriasi tidak langsung, dan karenanya tidak menimbulkan kewajiban bagi negara untuk membayar kompensasi. Ketiga putusan ICSID yang dianalisis dalam penelitian ini telah mengakui police powers doctrine dalam pertimbangan putusannya. Namun, belum ada pemahaman yang jelas dan konsisten berkaitan dengan penerapan dari doktrin ini.
This research is aimed to analyze the practice of police powers doctrine in ICSID awards. The concept of police powers doctrine is closely related to the concept of indirect expropriation. According to the police powers doctrine, a state measure that falls within the state’s police powers resulting in loss of property to the investors does not constitute an indirect expropriation, and, accordingly, does not give rise to an obligation for the state to compensate. The three ICSID awards analyzed in this research have all recognized police powers doctrine in its consideration. However, there is no clear and consistent understanding regarding the implementation of this doctrine.
This research is aimed to analyze the practice of police powers doctrine in ICSID awards. The concept of police powers doctrine is closely related to the concept of indirect expropriation. According to the police powers doctrine, a state measure that falls within the state’s police powers resulting in loss of property to the investors does not constitute an indirect expropriation, and, accordingly, does not give rise to an obligation for the state to compensate. The three ICSID awards analyzed in this research have all recognized police powers doctrine in its consideration. However, there is no clear and consistent understanding regarding the implementation of this doctrine.