Sejak 2018, aliran perdamaian positif terus berlanjut di Korea. Namun demikian, Asia Timur Laut masih memiliki faktor konflik Perang Dingin seperti konfrontasi ideologis, perpecahan, perselisihan wilayah dan ras senjata. Secara khusus, persaingan hegemonik antara Cina dan Amerika Serikat merupakan ancaman terbesar bagi tatanan internasional di Asia Timur Laut. Di satu sisi, ada semangat perdamaian berdasarkan rekonsiliasi dan kerja sama, tetapi di sisi lain, konfrontasi dan konflik terus berlanjut. Selain itu, arah dan langkah-langkah khusus untuk stabilitas di Asia Timur Laut masih kurang. Dalam tulisan ini, Perpetual Peace dari Kant ditetapkan sebagai kerangka struktur utama, dianalisis kembali sesuai dengan situasi saat ini, dan literatur terkait ditinjau untuk menganalisis kemungkinan promosi perdamaian di Asia Timur laut. Tulisan ini mengulas dan menganalisis literatur untuk melihat apakah tiga artikel definitif Kant yang efektif dalam Situasi Asia Timur Laut. Selain itu, berdasarkan ini, meninjau dan menganalisis literatur tentang apa yang harus dilakukan Korea untuk mempromosikan perdamaian di Asia Timur Laut dan hubungan apa yang harus dibangun dengan negara-negara tetangga. Since 2018, the flow of positive peace has continued in Korea. T However, Northeast Asia still has Cold War conflict factors such as ideological confrontation, division, territorial disputes and arms races. In particular, hegemonic competition between China and the United States is the biggest threat to the international order in Northeast Asia. On the one hand, there is a spirit of peace based on reconciliation and cooperation, but on the other hand, confrontation and conflict continues. In addition, specific directions and steps for stability in Northeast Asia are lacking. In this paper, Perpetual Peace from Kant is established as the main structural framework, analyzed again according to the current situation, and related literature is reviewed to analyze the possibility of promoting peace in Northeast Asia. This paper reviews and analyzes the literature to see whether Kant's three definitive articles are effective in the Northeast Asian Situation. In addition, based on this, reviewing and analyzing the literature on what Korea must do to promote peace in Northeast Asia and what relations should be established with neighboring countries. |