Aspek pengelolaan persampahan terdiri dari Teknis Operasional, Pembiayaan, Partisipasi Masyarakat, Hukurn, dan Kelembagaan. Sistem teknis operasional terdiri sistem pengumpulan, pengangkutan, pengolahan dan pembuangan akhir. Berdasarkan pelakunya, sistem pengumpulan sebagian besar dilakukan oleh masyarakat, sedangkan sistem pengangkutan dilakukan oleh pemerintah daerah. Penelitian ini dilakukan pada partisipasi masyarakat dalam operasionalisasi pengelolaan sampah domestik yaitu kegiatan pengumpulan sampah dari sumber rumah mewah, menengah, dan sederhana di Kecamatan Bantargebang, Rawa Lumbu, dan Bekasi 1imur. Beberapa masalah yang dapat diidentifikasi yaitu 1) cakupan pelayanan sampah yang masih rendah yaitu Kecamatan Bantargebang 35%, Rawa Lumbu 34,7%, dan Bekasi Timur 35,2% sehingga sisa sampah yang belum terangkut untuk Kecamatan Bantargebang 241 m3/hari, Rawa Lumbu 250 m3/hari, dan Bekasi Timur 393 m3/hari, 2) komposisi sampah domestik Kota Bekasi termasuk kecamatan tersebut mencapai 80%, sisanya 20% adalah sampah non domestik seperti industri, perkantoran, pertokoan, rumah sakit, dan pasar, 3) implementasi penegakan hukurn rendah dan lemah, dan 4) tidak adanya paradigma baru yaitu 3R (Reduce, Reuse, Recycle) dalam pengelolaan sampah. Hal tersebut diduga, salah satunya adalah akibat rendahnya partiaipasi masyarakat dalam operasionalisasi pengelolaan sampah. Berdasarkan identifikasi tersebut, rumusan masalah yang diajukan dalam penelitian ini yaitu adakah perbedaan partisipasi masyarakat berdasarkan kategori rumah mewah, menengah, dan sederhana dalam operasionalisasi pengelolaan sampah domestik ?. Hipotesisnya adalah terdapat perbedaan partisipasi masyarakat berdasarkan kategori rumah mewah, menengah, dan sederhana dalam operasionalisasi pengelolaan sampah domestik. Tujuannya adalah mengetahui partisipasi masyarakat kategori rumah mewah, menengah, dan sederhana dalam operasionalisasi pengelolaan sampah domestik, sehingga kebijakan pemerintah daerah yang diterapkan terhadap masyarakat tepat.Penelitian ini dilakukan terhadap responden rumah mewah, menengah, dan sederhana yang berjumlah 116 di Kecamatan Bantargebang, Rawa Lumbu, dan Bekasi Timur, serta wawancara terhadap Lurah Pedurenan di Bantargebang, Lurah Bojong Rawa Lumbu di Rawa Lumbu, dan Lurah Duren Jaya di Bekasi Timur. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian diperoleh Kesimpulan sebagai berikut:a. Terdapat perbedaan signifikan dalam kelompok sampel, yaitui antara mewah/menengah dengan sederhana. Perbedaan tersebut terletak pada I) kesesuaian tempat sampah dengan volume sampah yang dihasilkan, 2) kondisi tempat sampah, 3) keikutsertaan dalam penyuluhan, 4) kesediaan membayar retribusi, 5) keikutsertaan dalam go tong royong, dan 6) retribusi jika ditambah.b. Terdapat perbedaan partisipasi masyarakat dalam operasionalisasi pengelolaan sampah domestik di ketiga kecamatan yaitu 1) ketidaksesuaian kapasitas tempat sampah dengan volume sampah yang dihasilkan rumah mewah di Kecamatan Bekasi Timur dan rumah sederhana di Kecamatan Rawa Lumbu, 2) kebiasaan membuang sampah tidak pada tempatnya di Kecamatan Bantargebang dan Bekasi Timur, 3) penyapuan halaman yang kurang frekuensinya pada rumah mewah di Kecamatan Bantargebang, dan 4) keikutsertaan dalam penyuluhan yang kurang di Kecamatan Bantargebang dan Bekasi Timur.c. Adanya ketidaksesuaian kebijakan dengan kenyataan di masyarakat yaitu struktur retribusi sampah didasarkan pada kondisi bangunan tetapi pada kenyataannya di serahkan pada masyarakat, dan penenuan tarif progresif sampah didasarkan pada volume sampah yang dihasilkan tetapi kesulitan di pengukurannya.d. Prioritas masyarakat terhadap kualitas kebersihan masih kurang dibandingkan dengan permasalahan lain seperti keamanan, air bersih, listrik, dan lain-lain. Pengeluaran masyarakat semua kategori rumah untuk masalah keamanan, air bersih, dan listrik lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan kualitas kebersihan.
The aspect of Solid waste Management System are consist of operational technic, community participation, regulation, and institution. Based on it's role, a large part collecting system was done by community, whereas transportation system was done by district government. The scope of the study is particularly focused to the community participation in the operation of solid waste management from categories of house i.e, luxury, middle, and plain as solid waste generators in sub-district Bantargebang, Rawa Lumbu, and Bekasi Timur. There are more problems that identified namely : 1) the low of the services for solid waste i.e. sub-district Bantargebang 35%, Rawa Lumbu 34,7%, and Bekasi Timur 35,2%, so residu solid waste which hasn't transported for Bantargebang 241 m3/hari, Rawa Lumbu 250 m3/hari, and Bekasi Timur 393 m3/hari, 2) the composition of solid waste for Bekasi District conclude its sub-district are 80% and the residu are 20% namely non-domestic solid waste such as industries, office stores, hospitals, and market, 3) the implementation of the law is les and weak, and 4) there isn't new paradigm in solid waste management. Those are assumed as result of the low of the community participation in solid waste collecting system.Based on identification, the problem that was described in this reseach namely are there are community participation based on categories of house that are luxury, middle, and plain in the operation of solid waste management ?, the hypothesa namely there are some differences in The community participation base on the categories of house; luxury, middle, and plain in the operation of solid waste management, so that policy of district government which are implemented to community exactly true.The research was done to responden of luxury, middle, and simple which were amounts 116 at Sub-district Bantargebang, Rawa Lumbu, and Bekasi Timur, also depth interview to Lurah of Pedurenan at Bantargebang, Lurah of Bojong Rawa Lumbu at Rawa Lumbu, and Lurah Duren Jaya at Bekasi Timur.Based on result of research has got conclusion as follow:a. There are different in sample group, between luxury/middle with plain. The different in: 1) suitable between capacity of solid waste bin with solid waste volume that be produced, 2) condition of solid waste bin, 3) participation in information, 4) participation in pay retribution, 5) participation in mutual assistance, and 6) retribution if be increased.b. There are different community participation in the operation of solid waste management at three sub-district, 1) those are not suitable between capacity of solid waste bin with soiti waste volume that be produced luxury houses at sub district Bekasi Timur and simple houses at sub district Rawa Lumbu, 2) habit of dumping solid waste not in right place rub district Bantargebang and Bekasi Timur, 3) swept yard on luxury houses at sub-district Bantargebang, and 4) participation in information at sub-district Bantargebang and Bekasi Timur.c. There aren't suitable policy with fact in community those are structure of solid waste retribution based on building condition but in fact delivered over at community, and appointment of progresif retribution based on solid waste volume be produced but difficult at measurment.d. Prority of community on cleanness quality less be compared with other problem like security, water, electricity, etc. expenseas of community all house categories for security, water, electricity problem more than cleanness quality.Based on the result of research could he recommended as:a. Based on house categories, need socialization cleanness with different information according to its social condition.b. According to every sub-district, need informatin about 1) suitable between capacity of solid waste bin with solid waste volume that be produced luxury houses at sub-district Bekasi Timur and simple houses at sub-district Rawa Lumbu, 2) habit of dumping solid waste not in right place sub.-district Bantargebang and Bekasi Timur, 3) swept yard on luxury house at sub-district Bantargebang, and 4) participation in information at sub-district Bantargebang and Bekasi Timur.c. To engineer socialization of cleanness/ solid waste on community need involvement of social people like psychologist, communicant, sosiologist, etc.d. About policy, district government need to 1) appoinment right and community obligation, 2) extending servant area which has reached only 35%, 3) considering the old approaching namely collecting, transportation, treatment, and dumping to the new approach like 3R (reduce, Reuse, Recycle) and 4) considering institutional changing that is SubDin Kebersihan. |
T 14896a.pdf :: Unduh