UI - Disertasi (Open) :: Kembali

UI - Disertasi (Open) :: Kembali

Judul Fungsi sosial hak atas tanah dalam pengadaan tanah untuk kepentingan umum = Social functions on land rights in respect to land procurement for public interest purposes.
Nomor Panggil D1133
Pengarang
Pengarang/kontributor lain
Subjek
Penerbitan 2010
Program Studi
Kata Kunci fungsi sosial · pengadaan tanah · kepentingan umum ·
 Info Lainnya
Pembimbing
Fakultas none
Program Studi none
Desk. Fisik xvii, 478 peges ; 29 cm.
Lembaga Pemilik Universitas Indonesia
Lokasi Perpustakaan UI, Lantai 3
Format Koleksi none
Naskah Ringkas
  • Ketersediaan
  • File Digital: 1 (Open)
  • Ulasan
  • Sampul
  • Abstrak
  • Tampilan MARC
Nomor Panggil No. Barkod Ketersediaan
D1133 07-17-231724624 TERSEDIA
Ulasan:
Tidak ada ulasan pada koleksi ini: 20449529
ABSTRAK
Disertasi ini membahas mengenai fungsi sosial dalam pengadaan tanah untuk kepentingan umum. Asas fungsi sosial yang terdapat pada Pasal 6 Undang- Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 (UUPA), yakni semua hak atas tanah mempunyai fungsi sosial, yang berarti bahwa hak atas tanah apapun yang ada pada seseorang tidaklah dapat dibenarkan, bahwa tanah tersebut dipergunakan semata-mata untuk kepentingan pribadi. Tetapi tidak berarti bahwa kepentingan perseorangan akan
terdesak sama sekali oleh kepentingan umum/kepentingan masyarakat.
Kepentingan masyarakat dan kepentingan perseorangan harus saling
mengimbangi. Asas fungsi sosial ini tidak akan berubah, akan tetap saja. Namun penafsiran menjadi berubah-ubah tergantung pada kebijaksaan pemerintah. Dalam perlindungan hukumnya, pengadaan tanah untuk kepentingan umum secara wajib telah ada yaitu dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 tahun 1961, namun secara sukarela hanya dalam bentuk Peraturan Presiden saja, yaitu terakhir dengan
Peraturan Presiden Nomor 36 Tahun 20005 juncto Peraturan Presiden Nomor 65 Tahun 2006, yang tidak mempunyai kekuatan hukum. Namun Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 1961 digunakan hanya sekali saja, sedang selain ini tetap digunakan pengadaan tanah secara sukarela, walaupun pelaksanannya secara wajib, yakni dengan musyawarah semu, dengan cara intimidasi.
Dengan teori Utilitarianisme Jeremy Bentham untuk kepastian hukum dengan memandang nilai kemanfaatan serta teori Utilitarianisme Jhering, penulis mencoba mencari jawaban fungsi sosial dalam pengadaan tanah untuk kepentingan umum, yakni keseimbangan antara kepentingan individu, kepentingan masyarakat dan kepentingan umum yang diselaraskan dalam fungsi sosial hak atas tanah.


ABSTRACT

The following dissertation is outlining about the social functions in respect to land procurement for public interest purposes. The fundamental of social function in the Article 6 of Law no 5 of 1960 (UUPA), defines that all land rights have its social function, meaning that the rights of any lands which attached to individual shall be used for public interest, and shall not be used for individual interest. Such
definition does not mean that the individual interest will be urged by the public interest. Each public and individual interest shall be well-balanced. Nevertheless, such fundamental will never be changed, and must be fixed no matter what, but the definition can be varied depending on the Government Policy. In legal protection context, the principle of procurement land for public interest purposes has already been formed and governed in the Law No. 20 of 1961, and lastly
governed in the Presidential Regulation no.36 of 2005 juncto Presidential Regulation No.65 of 2006, which had no juridiction. However, The law no.20 of 1961 was only implemented once, apart from that, the common procedure of procurement land still accomplished voluntarily by holding apparent conferences
and discussions, and by conducting intimidation.
By considering the benefit value and applying Jeremy Bentham Utilitarianism theory to seek legal certainty, as well as applying Jhering Utilitarianism theory, the writer trying to find the answer of social functions in respect to land procurement for public interest purposes, that is to harmonize between individual and public interest in accordance to social functions itself.;The following dissertation is outlining about the social functions in respect to land procurement for public interest purposes. The fundamental of social function in the Article 6 of Law no 5 of 1960 (UUPA), defines that all land rights have its social function, meaning that the rights of any lands which attached to individual shall be used for public interest, and shall not be used for individual interest. Such
definition does not mean that the individual interest will be urged by the public interest. Each public and individual interest shall be well-balanced. Nevertheless, such fundamental will never be changed, and must be fixed no matter what, but the definition can be varied depending on the Government Policy. In legal protection context, the principle of procurement land for public interest purposes has already been formed and governed in the Law No. 20 of 1961, and lastly
governed in the Presidential Regulation no.36 of 2005 juncto Presidential Regulation No.65 of 2006, which had no juridiction. However, The law no.20 of 1961 was only implemented once, apart from that, the common procedure of procurement land still accomplished voluntarily by holding apparent conferences
and discussions, and by conducting intimidation.
By considering the benefit value and applying Jeremy Bentham Utilitarianism theory to seek legal certainty, as well as applying Jhering Utilitarianism theory, the writer trying to find the answer of social functions in respect to land procurement for public interest purposes, that is to harmonize between individual and public interest in accordance to social functions itself.
004
020
022
040LibUI ind rda
041ind
049[07-17-231724624]
053[07-17-231724624]
082
090D1133
100Lieke Lianadevi Tukgali, author
110
111
240
245|a Fungsi sosial hak atas tanah dalam pengadaan tanah untuk kepentingan umum = Social functions on land rights in respect to land procurement for public interest purposes. |c
246
250
260
260|a |b |c 2010
270
300xvii, 478 peges ; 29 cm.
310
321
336text (rdacontent)
337unmediated (rdamedia); computer (rdamedia)
338volume (rdacarrier); online resource (rdacarrier)
340
362
490
500
502Disertasi
504
515
520ABSTRAK
Disertasi ini membahas mengenai fungsi sosial dalam pengadaan tanah untuk kepentingan umum. Asas fungsi sosial yang terdapat pada Pasal 6 Undang- Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 (UUPA), yakni semua hak atas tanah mempunyai fungsi sosial, yang berarti bahwa hak atas tanah apapun yang ada pada seseorang tidaklah dapat dibenarkan, bahwa tanah tersebut dipergunakan semata-mata untuk kepentingan pribadi. Tetapi tidak berarti bahwa kepentingan perseorangan akan terdesak sama sekali oleh kepentingan umum/kepentingan masyarakat. Kepentingan masyarakat dan kepentingan perseorangan harus saling mengimbangi. Asas fungsi sosial ini tidak akan berubah, akan tetap saja. Namun penafsiran menjadi berubah-ubah tergantung pada kebijaksaan pemerintah. Dalam perlindungan hukumnya, pengadaan tanah untuk kepentingan umum secara wajib telah ada yaitu dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 tahun 1961, namun secara sukarela hanya dalam bentuk Peraturan Presiden saja, yaitu terakhir dengan Peraturan Presiden Nomor 36 Tahun 20005 juncto Peraturan Presiden Nomor 65 Tahun 2006, yang tidak mempunyai kekuatan hukum. Namun Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 1961 digunakan hanya sekali saja, sedang selain ini tetap digunakan pengadaan tanah secara sukarela, walaupun pelaksanannya secara wajib, yakni dengan musyawarah semu, dengan cara intimidasi. Dengan teori Utilitarianisme Jeremy Bentham untuk kepastian hukum dengan memandang nilai kemanfaatan serta teori Utilitarianisme Jhering, penulis mencoba mencari jawaban fungsi sosial dalam pengadaan tanah untuk kepentingan umum, yakni keseimbangan antara kepentingan individu, kepentingan masyarakat dan kepentingan umum yang diselaraskan dalam fungsi sosial hak atas tanah.
ABSTRACT
The following dissertation is outlining about the social functions in respect to land procurement for public interest purposes. The fundamental of social function in the Article 6 of Law no 5 of 1960 (UUPA), defines that all land rights have its social function, meaning that the rights of any lands which attached to individual shall be used for public interest, and shall not be used for individual interest. Such definition does not mean that the individual interest will be urged by the public interest. Each public and individual interest shall be well-balanced. Nevertheless, such fundamental will never be changed, and must be fixed no matter what, but the definition can be varied depending on the Government Policy. In legal protection context, the principle of procurement land for public interest purposes has already been formed and governed in the Law No. 20 of 1961, and lastly governed in the Presidential Regulation no.36 of 2005 juncto Presidential Regulation No.65 of 2006, which had no juridiction. However, The law no.20 of 1961 was only implemented once, apart from that, the common procedure of procurement land still accomplished voluntarily by holding apparent conferences and discussions, and by conducting intimidation. By considering the benefit value and applying Jeremy Bentham Utilitarianism theory to seek legal certainty, as well as applying Jhering Utilitarianism theory, the writer trying to find the answer of social functions in respect to land procurement for public interest purposes, that is to harmonize between individual and public interest in accordance to social functions itself.;The following dissertation is outlining about the social functions in respect to land procurement for public interest purposes. The fundamental of social function in the Article 6 of Law no 5 of 1960 (UUPA), defines that all land rights have its social function, meaning that the rights of any lands which attached to individual shall be used for public interest, and shall not be used for individual interest. Such definition does not mean that the individual interest will be urged by the public interest. Each public and individual interest shall be well-balanced. Nevertheless, such fundamental will never be changed, and must be fixed no matter what, but the definition can be varied depending on the Government Policy. In legal protection context, the principle of procurement land for public interest purposes has already been formed and governed in the Law No. 20 of 1961, and lastly governed in the Presidential Regulation no.36 of 2005 juncto Presidential Regulation No.65 of 2006, which had no juridiction. However, The law no.20 of 1961 was only implemented once, apart from that, the common procedure of procurement land still accomplished voluntarily by holding apparent conferences and discussions, and by conducting intimidation. By considering the benefit value and applying Jeremy Bentham Utilitarianism theory to seek legal certainty, as well as applying Jhering Utilitarianism theory, the writer trying to find the answer of social functions in respect to land procurement for public interest purposes, that is to harmonize between individual and public interest in accordance to social functions itself.
533
534
536
546Bahasa Indonesia
590[Deposit]
650Social function, Land procurement, Public interest
653fungsi sosial; pengadaan tanah; kepentingan umum
700Hutagalung, Arie S., promotor; Kriekhoff, Valerine Jaqueline Leanore, co-promotor; Rosa Agustina, examiner; Harkristuti Harkrisnowo, examiner; Jufrina Rizal, examiner; Abdurrahman, examiner (edit); Sitorus, Oloan, examiner
710Universitas Indonesia. Fakultas Hukum
711
850Universitas Indonesia
852Perpustakaan UI, Lantai 3
856
866
900
902
903[]