ABSTRAK
Skripsi ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan dan menganalisis tentang syaratpatentabilitas suatu invensi berdasarkan sengketa antara Apple melawan Samsungdan implikasinya terhadap perkembangan paten di Indonesia. Penulismempergunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan studi kepustakaanyang menggabungkan doctrine of anticipation, doctrine of equivalents, dandoctrine of best mode dalam melakukan analisis terhadap Putusan PengadilanDeen Haag 396957/KG ZA11-730. Hasil penulisan skripsi ini dalam PutusanPutusan Pengadilan Deen Haag 396957/KG ZA11-730 menunjukkan hakim tidaksecara teliti dalam memberikan perlindungan paten terhadap suatu invensi. Selainitu, dapat dilihat bagaimana implikasi terhadap Indonesia atas adanya sengketa iniadalah Indonesia berpotensi untuk mengalami sengketa serupa karena Indonesiamerupakan pasar dari kedua produsen tersebut dan negara hukum.

---

ABSTRACT
The purpose of this thesis is to explain and analyse the patentable subject matter

evidence from Apple versus Samsung and its implications toward the

development of software patent law in Indonesia. The writer uses the juridicalnormative

research method alongside bibliographic study which mixes doctrine of

anticipation, doctrine of equivalents, and doctrine of best mode to analyse the case

based on Verdict of The Hague Number 396957/KG ZA 11-730. From Verdict of

The Hague Number 396957/KG ZA 11-730, it can be concluded that the Judge

failed to analyse the claimed invention properly regarding giving patent protection

to the claimed invention. Besides, this thesis will bring into focus the implications

from the case about the probability of such case happen in Indonesia because of

Indonesia is considered as their market shares.