Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"ABSTRACTLingkungan strategis bangsa Indonesia telah mendorong merosotnya solidaritas kebangsaan. Lingkungan strategis di tingkat global meliputi terjangan arus globalisasi yang telah memengaruhi pola berpikir bangsa Indonesia, khususnya generasi muda. Lingkungan di strategis tingkat regional berupa persaingan politik global negara-negara besar yang mendorong kepada konflik di Laut Cina Selatan dan Semenanjung Korea. Lingkungan strategis di tingkat nasional yakni munculnya politik identitas dan politisasi suku, agama, ras, dan aliran (SARA) untuk kepentingan politik praktis. Berbagai tantangan terhadap solidaritas tersebut mendorong gagasan untuk menjadikan Pancasila kembali sebagai pandangan hidup masyarakat dan bangsa Indonesia. Hal itu didasarkan pada pertimbangan bahwa Pancasila sebagai ideologi memiliki tiga dimensi yaitu dimensi realita, dimensi ideal, dan dimensi fleksibel. Selama ini Pancasila sebagai pandangan hidup mulai ditinggalkan. Oleh karena itu, Pancasila perlu re-interpretasi dengan semangat reformasi agar bisa diterima sebagai pandangan hidup bangsa Indonesia. Penulisan karya tulis ilmiah ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan teknis kajian pustaka. Studi ini menyimpulkan bahwa menurunnya solidaritas kebangsaan dapat diselesaikan dengan mengembalikan Pancasila sebagai pandangan hidup bangsa Indonesia."

""The order of international relations in Asia is predominantly state-centric. It is one based primarily on absolute national sovereignty, exclusive national identity and patriotic national citizenship. This sovereignty-based or state-centered order, however, has been challenged and progressively undermined by a people-centric order that is governed by ideals of global citizenship and principles of global justice. In this people-centric order, the emergence of a new form of politics in which citizens are empowered by various non-governmental organizations that serve to define and influence world politics is envisaged. Clearly, such an order clashes with the prevailing Asian national sovereignty-based model. This book provides a systematic descriptive, explanatory and normative analysis of the clash of normative orders in Asia, and develops an analysis of Asian responses to the challenge posed by a more diffuse people-centric order and the implications this may have for global justice. The book aims to study two paradigms of political order -- a national statist sovereignty-based order and a people-centric order, analyze the conflict between two diverse political paradigms within an Asian setting, and assess the various challenges a people-centric order poses for a sovereignty-based order. It also aims to address the paucity of Asian normative thinking through a synthesis of intellectual sources and normative theories. It applies, tests, revises and develops Western normative theories of the people-centric order. It is a must read for students and researchers who are interested in the theoretical debates -- especially Asian voices -- on normative issues in Asia"--"

"This book aims to present innovative theoretical and empirical approaches that can increase our understanding of this transition. Scholars from the fields of international relations, international political economy, economics and security studies not only explore current theoretical debates on ?power? and ?power shifts? among entities, but also provide fresh insights into relevant aspects of international power in the 21st century. With a particular focus on aspects of international security, trade and production, new methods of identifying power and its sources are presented, and their potential implications and challenges are discussed."