Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"EPC project meaning that a construction company will handle whole work, from designing activity, procurement and implementation construction. Base imposition withholding tax article 23 and Value Added Tax (VAT) on EPC project are from their service value. However, in fact EPC project have same treatment equal with construction services in general. This difference is happen because there are no specific regulation about the EPC project. The regulation that exist for now, just only controls about the taxation charge for the construction company in general.

The research is using quantitative approach in intention to have better understanding and interpretation about a social phenomenon through observation. This research is among descriptive research to describe research object based on the fact notice or as it is. Primary data gathering is acquired by doing in-depth interview to discover information from informant who is directly involve in EPC project especially with taxation division, the government who is making the policy, tax consultant, academician and association of constructions. Secondary data is acquired by literature study to optimize theoretical framework in deciding the purpose and goal of the research also the concepts and other theoretical material in conjunction with research problem. Data analyses are using qualitative data analysis based on field discovery, both primary and secondary data.

From the analysis that are conducted, it is found that the basic differences about the charge between withholding tax article 23 and basic charge of VAT on EPC project. The reason is there are differences of understanding the regulation that exist, this thing is practically cause some problems, whether it is between the EPC industrialist with the owner of the project, or between the EPC industrialist with the taxation checkers side. So, it is necessary for making the constitution regarding the tax object of EPC project . Next, specific taxation regulation about the EPC project needs to be created, to think of there are non similar understandings of the regulation that exist. With the existence of the specific special regulation about the EPC project, It is doubtfully will not cause the difference of understandings between the EPC industrialist and the owner of the project."

"Skripsi ini membahas penetapan Nilai Lain sebagai Dasar Pengenaan Pengenaan Pajak atas produk rekaman ditinjau dari asas-asas pemungutan pajak produktivitas penerimaan, kepastian hukum, dan kesederhanaan. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif dengan desain deskriptif analisis.Hasil penelitian ini dilihat dari latar belakang penetapan dasar Pengenaan Pajak adalah karena ada potensi pemasukan pajak yang besar namun sulit dipungut jika menggunakan mekanisme umum. Hasil penelitian jika ditinjau dari asas produktivitas penerimaan ketetapan ini bertujuan mengamankan penerimaan negara. Berdasarkan asas kepastian hukum ketetapan ini kurang memberikan kepastian hukum karena kesalahan penggunaan pasal 1 angka 17 Undang-undang Pajak Pertambahan Nilai. Akhirnya, berdasarkan asas kesederhanaan ketetapan ini sudah memberikan kesederhanaan baik bagi wajib pajak atau Direktorat Jenderal Perpajakan karena pajak hanya dibebankan pada satu level pemungutan.

---

The focus of this study is the quotition other value as tax base for recording product reviewed from revenue productivity, certainty and simplicity tax principle. This research is qualitative with descriptive analysist design.The result for this research based on the background is because there is big potential tax income but it is difficult to collect with common mechanism. The result reviewed from revenue productivity principle is to secure the income of the country. Based on certainty principle this quotation gives less certainty because the misinterpretation of article 1 number 17 Indonesian Value Added Tax law. Finally, based on simplicity principle this quotition has given simplicity whether for tax payer or Tax General Directorate because the imposition is levied only to one level."

"Starting on April 2007, The Directorate General of Taxes has imposed Income Tax Article 23 of advertisement installing services at printed media by withholding tax system. Since the 2006 tax revenue did not reach its target, this policy is established as one of way to fulfill tax revenue in 2007 and years after it. The industry itself is in the financial unstable condition. This research begins with the fact that income from advertisement installing service is categorized as business income, which net income is difficult to determine before end of tax year because there are no exact amount of both revenues and expenses yet. It causes the difficulty in determining the accurate tax rate of Article 23 that is collected by withholding tax system. The inaccurate tax rate of Article 23 itself may affect the company?s cash flow.

The research has two purposes: (1) to find out the policy?s backgrounds in imposing Income Tax Article 23 on advertisement installing services at printed media by withholding tax system; and (2) to explain the problems occur during the accomplishment of the impositions of Income Tax Article 23 on advertisement installing services at printed media. In order to accomplish the purposes mentioned above, this research done by qualitative approach using depth interview as qualitative data collection technique. This research can be also classified into descriptive, pure, and cross-sectional research.

The results show that the reasons in imposing Income Tax Article 23 on advertisement installing services at printed media are: (1) to input advertisement installing services at printed media to taxation system in order to save its tax potential; (2) to explore a potential tax revenue from advertisement installing services transactions at printed media; (3) to help increasing the government?s revenue during the year. This research also proves that this Article 23 imposition causes several problems: (1) lack of proper socialization from tax officer causing less awareness of tax withholder in withholding printed media?s taxes; (2) dispute between user and advertisement agents in determining the party that obliged to withhold the Article 23 taxes of printed media as a result of bias procedure; (3) decreased daily budget of printed media; (4) increased administrative burden for both user, printed media, and tax officer."

"Self Assessment System yang dianut perpajakan Indonesia memberikan kepercayaan kepada Wajib Pajak untuk melaksanakan pemenuhan kewajiban perpajakannya secara mandiri. Sedangkan fiskus hanya berfungsi sebagai pembina dan pengawas jalannya pemenuhan kewajiban tersebut dan harus riemastikan bahwa setiap Wajib Pajak telah melaksanakan kewajiban perpajakannya dan mendapatkan haknya sesuai dengan Undang-Undang dan ketentuan lainnya yang berlaku.Oleh karena itu perlu diberikan kepastian hukum bagi Wajib Pajak agar tidak ada keragu-raguan bagi Wajib Pajak untuk memenuhi kewajibannya ataupun menuntut haknya. Pajak harus diatur dalam Undang-Undang, oleh karenanya Undang-Undang Perpajakan harus mampu memberikan kepastian hukum yang dimaksudkan di atas.Salah satu hak Wajib Pajak yang diatur dalam Undang-Undang Perpajakan adalah memperoleh pengurangan atau penghapusan Sanksi Administrasi yang telah ditetapkan oleh Direktorat Jenderal Pajak. Hal inilah yang akan dikaji mengapa masih diperlukan upaya kepastian hukum dan keadilan dalam pelaksanaan pengurangan dan penghapusan sanksi administrasi dan bagaimana ketentuan pengurangan dan penghapusan sanksi administrasi ditinjau dari sistem self assessment.Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dapat disampaikan bahwa Upaya kepastian hukum dan keadilan masih diperlukan dalam pelaksanaan pengurangan dan penghapusan sanksi administrasi pajak, karena dapat saja terjadi pengenaan saksi administrasi kepada Wajib Pajak yang kemungkinan disebabkan ketidaktelitian petugas pajak dan Pemberian Pengurangan dan penghapusan sanksi administrasi pajak kurang tepat dalam sistem self assesment, karena kepastian hukum dan law enforcement menjadi tidak ada dan sifatnya sangat subyektif, dimana ketetapan yang telah dibuat dapat dihilangkan hanya karena alasan ketidaktelitian semata dan memberikan kewenangan Direktur Jenderal Pajak yang sangat luas."

"Mengacu pada ketentuan Pasal 11 UU Pajak Pertambahan Nilai (UU PPN), saat terutangnya pajak atas penyerahan Barang Kena Pajak (BKP) adalah saat penyerahan atau saat pembayaran, mana yang lebih dahulu terjadi. Saat penyerahan BKP kemudian ditentukan dalam beberapa kategori, termasuk pada saat pengakuan pendapatan, saat pengakuan piutang atau saat pembuatan faktur penjualan. Namun penentuan saat penyerahan yang berlaku umum ini tidak berlaku untuk penyerahan BKP konsinyasi yang saat penyerahannya diatur secara khusus pada saat diserahkannya barang untuk dititipkan. Penelitian ini dilakukan berdasarkan pendekatan kualitatif dan bertujuan untuk menganalisa ketentuan PPN atas penyerahan BKP dalam transaksi konsinyasi dan kesesuaiannya dengan konsep penyerahan serta menggambarkan kendala yang dihadapi oleh PKP dalam melaksanakan ketentuan PPN atas transaksi konsinyasi.

---

Pursuant to provision of Article 11 of prevailing Value Added Tax (VAT) Law, supply on taxable goods is due when the goods are delivered or when the payment are made, whichever occurs first. The taxable supply then determined in several catagories away other things to be in line with the revenue recognition as for accounting purpose, on receivable recognition, or when the invoice is issued. However, this general provision of time supply determination does not apply for supply of goods on consignment transaction that is normally due on delivery of consignment goods. Therefore, the purpose of research that conducted by the qualitative approach is to analyze the VAT provision of supply of goods on consignment transaction and it's conformity with taxable supply concept and describes the obstacles encountered by taxable person in implementing the provision of the VAT consignment transaction."

"Penelitian ini membahas mengenai dasar pengenaan Pajak Pertambahan Nilai atas jasa outsourcing di Indonesia. Kebijakan tersebut secara khusus tertuang dalam Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 83 Tahun 2012 Tentang Kriteria Dan/Atau Rincian Jasa Tenaga Kerja Yang Tidak Dikenai Pajak Pertambahan Nilai khususnya pada pasal 4. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menjelaskan alasan dari pemerintah menetapkan adanya dua dasar pengenaan pajak, bagaimana kebijakan ini ditinjau dari asas kepastian hukum (certainty), serta apa yang menjadi hambatan dalam pelaksanaan kebijakan ini di lapangan.Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Hasil penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa kebijakan dasar pengenaan Pajak Pertambahan Nilai atas jasa Outsourcing yaitu atas penggantian dan nilai lain, memiliki alasan dan dasar pemikiran tersendiri yang didukung oleh teori dan konsep yang sesuai. Kebijakan yang diatur pada PMK Nomor 83/03/2012 ini dikeluarkan untuk memberikan kepastian akan kekuatan hukum pelaksanaan pemungutan PPN atas Jasa Outsourcing meskipun adanya dua dasar pengenaan pajak ini dinilai tidak sesuai dengan konsep aturan,dimana dalam satu aturan tidak diperbolehkan ada yang bersifat fakultatif. Dalam pelaksanaanya kebijakan ini memiliki hambatan terutama terkait sosialisasi kebijakan tersebut.

---

This research is about Tax Base of Value Added Tax on Outsourcing services in Indonesia The policy is specifically stated in the Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 83 Tahun 2012 Tentang Kriteria Dan/Atau Rincian Jasa Tenaga Kerja Yang Tidak Dikenai Pajak Pertambahan Nilai in particular on Article 4. This research is to explain about the reason the government established the two tax bases, how this policy in terms of the principle of legal certainty and what are the obstacles in the implementation of this policy.

This is a descriptive research with qualitative approach. Results of this study concluded that the basic policy of imposition of Value Added Tax on Outsourcing services is the subtitution and other value has its own reasons and rationale that is supported by appropriate theories and concepts. Policies that set the PMK 83/03/2012 Number is issued to provide legal certainty to force the implementation of the collection of VAT on Services Outsourcing although the two tax bases is not assessed in accordance with the concept of the rule, which is not allowed under the existing rules are voluntary. In the implementation of this policy has barriers mainly related to the policy of socialization."

"Tesis ini bertujuan untuk menganalisa pengenaan pajak penghasilan atas transaksi pengalihan participating interest oleh kontraktor minyak dan gas bumi sebagaimana diatur dalam Peraturan Pemerintah No. 79 Tahun 2010 dalam kerangka peraturan perundang-undangan perpajakan yang berlaku termasuk di dalamnya Perjanjian Penghindaran Pajak Berganda. Penelitian ini juga dimaksudkan untuk menjadi bahan masukan bagi pemegang otoritas di pemerintahan dalam usaha pemungutan pajak atas transaksi pengalihan tersebut sehingga dapat memberikan kepastian hukum bagi kedua belah pihak agar iklim usaha di bidang minyak dan gas bumi tetap kondusif untuk investasi.

---

This thesis is aimed to analyse the of the income tax imposition on participating interest transfer by an oil and gas contractor under Government Regulation No. 79 in 2010 within the applicable tax law and regulation framework including the application of tax treaty, as well as the relevant domestic tax regulation. This thesis was also intended to be an input for the Relevant Government Authority for tax collection on the transfer of participating interest in order to provide legal certainty for both parties, therefore the business of oil and gas industry remains conducive to investment."

"Giving the authority of law income tax to thegovernment for decided kind of service as income tax object article23, evoke extend income tax object article23, that is not only as a passive income but also as a business income.There is two analytical questions in this research, the first is how to implications of extend income tax object article 23 for the government, with holder and income tax receiver. The second, what the suitable of taxobject that can change to be a saw with holding income tax article 23 base on with holding income tax conception and international best practice.This research used qualitative approach with a descriptive researc htype to describe an objective with facts that revealed. The collecting data technique itself is done by a literature study from various sources like an article, book, internet and in¬depth interview with some informants whoa rerelated with this research.The result of this research shown that development income tax object article 23 has an implication to the government such as increase tax acceptance, decrease cost collection, and have opportunity cost. For with holder have burden. Moreover, for implication to income tax receiver is the cash flow tax receiver can be decrease, time of money lose, and increase compliance cost. Base donw it hholding income tax conception and international best practice, the suitable object as income tax object article 23 is inpassive income.This research recommended, the administration tax system in thegovernment need tobe fix, giving reward to with holder, apply proper income tariff that cannot disturbed the cashflow, clarify the object of income taxarticle 23 with giving definition and sample from theobject, streamline income tax article 25."

"PT Nabisco Foods out for light food producer do increasing of sale of the product. For PT Nabisco Foods do promotion cooperation with a few retail company. This cooperation can be done by giving discount, giving of goods for free, year-end bonus if was abysmal of goals. Product placement in counter retail also one of form of promotion done by PT Nabisco Foods."